The Canon EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Lens is a peerless super fast standard lens featuring an ultra-large aperture for a narrow depth of field and soft background blur so loved by photographers everywhere. The lens is suitable for any shooting situation; its lens coating and construction are optimized to minimize the ghosting and flare that frequently occurs when lenses are used with digital cameras.
This high-performance, weather-resistant lens delivers all the superb image resolution and contrast one can expect in a Canon L Series lens.
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Focal Length | 50 mm |
| Aperture |
Maximum: f/1.2 Minimum: f/16 |
| Camera Mount Type | Canon EF |
| Format Compatibility |
35mm Film / Full-Frame Digital Sensor Canon (APS-C) |
| Angle of View | 46° |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 1.5' (45 cm) |
| Magnification | 0.15x |
| Maximum Reproduction Ratio | 1:6.6 |
| Groups/Elements | 6/8 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 8 |
| Features | |
|---|---|
| Image Stabilization | No |
| Autofocus | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No |
| Physical | |
|---|---|
| Filter Thread | 72 mm |
| Dimensions (DxL) | Approx. 3.4 x 2.6" (8.64 x 6.60 cm) |
| Weight | 1.30 lb (590 g) |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Idiosyncratic, frustrating, brilliant!
This really is an interesting lens. I've gone from hating it to loving it over a few short days. It's hugely idiosyncratic, and in that sense, much of the criticism that it has ...Read complete review
This really is an interesting lens. I've gone from hating it to loving it over a few short days. It's hugely idiosyncratic, and in that sense, much of the criticism that it has received on web forums, blogs and reviews is largely correct. However, when you get to know the lens, it really is very capable and offers a unique perspective on the world.
It's heavy and does not have IS, and therefore, you will get some blur if you don't use flash below around 1/30 sec. Also, there is definitely a flaw in the focus algorithms, but only when shooting faces and focusing on eyes. Under controlled conditions, shooting a mm scaled ruler, it hits focus accurately 100% of the time. Shooting portraits, I hit around 65 to 70% success. This is quite acceptable given the incredibly narrow depth of field at f1.2. It definitely does back focus on some occasions, but not often enough to be a problem, and given the narrow slither of focus available wide open, it probably wouldn't show up any missfocus at anything much above f2.8 where the zone of focus is a bit wider.
How sharp is it - razor sharp from f1.2 up. Sharpness improves up to f1.6, and then reaches a peak at around f2.2. However, I shoot at f1.2 whenever I can as results are simply brilliant. So, this is a bit of a love me hate me lens. It is definitely not worth the money, and unless you are wealthy or a true bona fide professional earning your money through social photography (not so many of them left now), I'd think twice before parting with your money. However, if you are in this category, or a keen amateur portrait photographer, you won't regret buying this lens - just be prepared to accept it does have some foibles. It is limited to 50 or 80mm equivalence on FF or APS-C cameras, and you might miss your zoom, but when you nail a shot with this lens, nothing can compare to it. The 80mm f1.2 is too large and heavy and the electric focusing all conspire to put the 50mm ahead (cheaper too). I like this lens on a crop frame camera best as the 80mm perspective is particularly flattering. I remember when in film days of the 1980s we were all told to throw our 'useless' 50mm lenses away and buy zooms - how things change!
I was tainted by all the bad press about this lens, but I'm glad I got it. The reviews I read made me paranoid, and I was pixel peeping every image for sharpness - I guess you all will too after spending this much money. I read one review that said the lens caused strange yellow banding patterning on most frames some of the time. Imagine my thoughts when this happened to me on the second day I had it - I was ready to throw the lens in the bin (well return it). But ha - I learnt that at fast shutter speeds (due to large aperture), older style fluorescent lighting causes this patterning. Motto - don't believe half the rubbish you read on blogs! My advice is to buy this lens, it'll give you great pleasure and inject a new perspective to your photography. My view is that this is a sharp, brilliant lens, but a truly idiosyncratic one - a bit like many creative geniuses. But don't buy on a whim or a must have premise, buy if you are in need of the narrow depth of field and unique images that this trait confers Enjoy, and I hope this review dispels some of the misinformation and confusion that exists out there, and particularly with prospective buyers.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
A Necessary evil
I shoot a wide variety of subject matter for my work and, because I exclusively use full frame Canon bodies and always try to use prime lenses, a 50mm is almost mandatory.
Read complete review
I shoot a wide variety of subject matter for my work and, because I exclusively use full frame Canon bodies and always try to use prime lenses, a 50mm is almost mandatory.
I have owned the EF 50mm f1.4 for years and it is a really good lens. Unfortunately, it is not a truely great one as it flares, focuses erratically and suffers from chromatic aberration, amongst other things.
I assumed the 50mm f1.2L would have to be much better because it is much heavier, many times the price and only a third of a stop faster. I was wrong. For examle, compared to my Mk. I 85mm f1.2, (which it is in the same "family" as) it is very poor. The later 50mm f1.2 should have built on this 20 year old design but it went backwards.
In some ways it is better than the EF 50mm f1.4. It has less flare and it is sharper to about f4 but it still has chromatic aberration, it is only acceptably sharp in the centre and it really suffers with back focussing and erratic focussing problems. I have paid Canon several times to try and get this lens to focus reliably, ( and had it done under warranty too). I have now given up and and accepted the best compromise after many hours of micro-adjustment with my camera bodies. I just shoot a lot of frames wherever possible. If I can get away with it I manually focus with live view or, even better, use my old Zeiss f1.4 plannar. In all I have 9 L series lenses and this has been the only truly troublesome one. My colleges are having similar problems with them. I would be o.k. about it if this didn't cost almost as much as the last car I could afford.
Australian photographers are rarely rich but, like other professionals, we get in trouble if we don't produce sharp photos. If you need the best compromise to do your job and they pay you well enough, this might be it but, otherwise, get the 50mm f1.4. It is a fraction of the price and, in in many ways it is the better lens. Now, why did I sell mine? . . . Better get another one.
REVIEWS
Reviewed by 700 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have nothing bad to say about this lens. It is amazing. Has a beautiful soft background blur,very fast and well built. This lens is a keeper.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I use this lens for portraits and weddings. It's a great lens, but tends to be slightly fuzzy even when I adjusted my micro focus adjustment.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Nice Bokeh ,fast auto-focus!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Shoots great indoors, low light. I use the Al Servo setting and it's taking me some time getting used to its focusing style, but super creamy bokeh is a given 100% of the time. It took me a while to justify buying this lens, having never shot with a standard lens before, but it took me no time to adjust to it. Great purchase!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
A must-have lens!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
This lens is as bipolar as the reviews make it out to be. I'll start this off by saying that I returned my copy of the 50L after one week of use. When this lens focused correctly, it spat out some phenomenal photos that were distinctive and beautifully rendered. It sucks in light like a super massive black hole and isolates subjects from just about anything. The lens is light (compared to the 85L and 70-200 - weighs pretty much the same as a 135L or 35L) and compact. It feels well built too. I bought it primarily for use while traveling in inclement weather but never got to use it in any of that so I cannot comment on the weather sealing. Definitely focuses faster than the 85L but slower than the 35L.
That said, there are quite a few negatives regarding the 50L. If you have a 5D mark II, turn around now and buy another lens (or buy a 5D mark III or 1Dx or even a 1D3/4). This lens just does not get along with the AF system on the 5D mark II. I calibrated it no less than 3 times and STILL had erratic focusing. Sometimes, it would nail critical focus and the image would turn out wonderfully. Other times, I would have the center AF point directly pointed at a very contrast-y subject and the lens would back-focus about a foot - sometimes more. It is soft wide open - not just glowing and ethereal - there is a distinct lack of sharpness wide open. If you own an 85L, it is softer than that by a fairly wide margin when both are wide open. There is a lack of contrast and lack of color saturation when compared to the 85L as well - again, when both are wide open. Stopped down to f/2.0 - the 50L is tack sharp, but if you have to stop down to f/2.0 then why would you buy this lens in the first place? That, and between f/1.8 and f/4 there is a significant focus shift within 2 meters of the camera. Past f/4 and the focal plane is wide enough to compensate, at f/1.2 and f/1.4 the plane is right where it should be. Also, because this lens doesn't have a floating element, the focal plane is strongly curved so the focus/recompose technique completely falls flat on its face when using this lens.
In the end, I would have kept this lens if it focused correctly even 80% of the time but at a 20-30% hit rate on my 5D2 and a 60-70% hit rate on my 1D3, I just couldn't see myself ever trusting this lens for fast shooting so I will be sticking with my trusted 35/85 combination.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have no regrets spending the money on this lens. Pricey but sturdy and reliable, and produces beautiful images.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am shooting with the Canon 5d markiii, full frame.
> The 35L vs 50L.
The 35L is great. Why?
It's good for people and stuff. Good in low light, obviously.
The 50L is very close FL wise to the 35L, so it will work for virtually all of the same things as a 35L.
But it will be a little more special (color, bokeh, 1.2, build).
The 50L is great for people.
It's the very good walkabout FL on a FF.
If I want to go on a vacation and bring just one lens, 50L it can really do it all.
- the candids, the portraits, the landscape, evening.
There is something about the 50L, the rendering... yea you knew that.
But 50mm is really a great place to be. When you have it, you just feel good. You are versatile!
The 35L does everything well, but there's isn't anything special about it.
Had it, sold it.
I now have three primes 24Lii 50L 85L.
Think about that, wide, standard, and portrait. Simple right?
> 35L vs 50L.
> Owning 50L and 85L, what is unholy about this?
The 85mm is a MAJOR commitment, financially and also it's practicality.
You KNOW when you have the 85L on your body, or in your bag.
The 50L feels like it was made to be mounted to my 5D.
It balances it out like magic, it JUST FEELS right.
What is the best focal length for you? Who knows.
The 85mm is obviously the most popular/perfect for portrait.
But the 50mm is there for portrait and everything else, too.
It allows me to be closer to kids. I love having both.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Just used this lens for the first time at a wedding. SO much quieter and more effective than the 50mm 1.8 I had been using!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have owned this lens for 3 years now, I unfortunately was a victim of a robbery and lost all my gear. This was the first lens I immediately replaced, of the 5 I owned. I use it all the time, and for so many different applications. No complaints!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am a commercial and portrait photographer and have used the 50mm f/1.4 lens for years. I have the 85 f/1.2 and have been loving it. I was realizing that I might actually want to buy the 50 f/1.2 and possibly get rid of the 85mm and the 50mm that I already have.
So, I pulled the trigger. And I love the feel, the size and the weight. It is a beautiful lens, but I wanted to see some improvement over the f/1.4 lens and at least as good wide open as the 85 1.2. Heck, if the 50 1.2 was at least as good as the 50 1.4, I would have been happy.
I did a very simple test. Mounted my camera on a tripod, focused on the door next to my desk and shot both the 1.2 and 1.4 with the same settings (set to 1.6). The 1.2 just seemed a little blurry, not as sharp as the 1.4. So I did it again, shot several different subjects and downloaded the images to have a huge view on my computer and not just on my tiny lcd of my camera.
Every image was the same... not sharp. I began to do some searching online an found several articles on the back focus issue of the 50mm 1.2 lens. This was enough for me to decide to return the lens and hold off until Canon fixes this issue.
Two stars for the build, look and feel... but that's not a reason to pay this much for a lens.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Absolutely no vignetting wide open on my 5D3. Also, very sharp at f/1.2, and excellent sharpness throughout all f/ stops from f/4 on up.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Great for portraits or just walking around. Excellent bokeh, sharp, and fast focusing.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I use the 50mm L for portrait photogrpahy. It's sharp and not too heavy or bulky. I'm very pleased with it so far.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
A must have for anyone who wants to be a serious photographer. Sharp images, exceptional build quality. It's a no brainer! Get this lens. Don't let those nitpickers make you second guess yourself. It's heaver than I thought it was going to be, but I like that in my equipment.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I've been shooting weddings primarily with the 35L, 85L and 135L, but I added the 50L to my gear upon seeing some pretty flawless SOOCs from second shooters who use the 50L. It's much faster to focus than the 85L (v.1), and it plays well with sun flare, if I choose to go there. Great focal length for family portrait sessions, too. (I was using the Sigma 50 1.4 prior to springing for the 50L.)
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am so happy that I purchased this lens! I have gravely needed to upgrade my photography equipment (I photograph weddings and landscapes). I read so endless reviews, spoke with some of my photography idols, trying to decide what my next big purchase would be.
Everything pointed to the 50mm F/1.2 and I couldn't be happier! Very fast, near-silent AF, beautiful bokeh, and solid construction. I live in the rainy Pacific Northwest and the water resistance is definitely a major plus.
The lens is very heavy, but that is to be expected with its glass.
I have a feeling this guys is going to be go-to lens for years to come!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Was a little scared about the focusing issues but mine works fine on my 5d3.
Would not recommend it to my fotog friends because I do not need the competition.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
It's amazing lens I recommend every one to get it
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
If you're looking for a versatile lens, this is the one. The clear pictures you'll get from it will amaze you and your portraits will turn out great. With its f1.2 capability you'll seldom use flash. If however, you're looking for either zoom or wide angle, this won't work too well. I found myself going further back really far to try to capture as much of the scenery as possible so this won't be too usefull for those up-close architecture shots.
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Idiosyncratic, frustrating, brilliant!
This really is an interesting lens. I've gone from hating it to loving it over a few short days. It's hugely idiosyncratic, and in that sense, much of the criticism that it has ...Read complete review
This really is an interesting lens. I've gone from hating it to loving it over a few short days. It's hugely idiosyncratic, and in that sense, much of the criticism that it has received on web forums, blogs and reviews is largely correct. However, when you get to know the lens, it really is very capable and offers a unique perspective on the world.
It's heavy and does not have IS, and therefore, you will get some blur if you don't use flash below around 1/30 sec. Also, there is definitely a flaw in the focus algorithms, but only when shooting faces and focusing on eyes. Under controlled conditions, shooting a mm scaled ruler, it hits focus accurately 100% of the time. Shooting portraits, I hit around 65 to 70% success. This is quite acceptable given the incredibly narrow depth of field at f1.2. It definitely does back focus on some occasions, but not often enough to be a problem, and given the narrow slither of focus available wide open, it probably wouldn't show up any missfocus at anything much above f2.8 where the zone of focus is a bit wider.
How sharp is it - razor sharp from f1.2 up. Sharpness improves up to f1.6, and then reaches a peak at around f2.2. However, I shoot at f1.2 whenever I can as results are simply brilliant. So, this is a bit of a love me hate me lens. It is definitely not worth the money, and unless you are wealthy or a true bona fide professional earning your money through social photography (not so many of them left now), I'd think twice before parting with your money. However, if you are in this category, or a keen amateur portrait photographer, you won't regret buying this lens - just be prepared to accept it does have some foibles. It is limited to 50 or 80mm equivalence on FF or APS-C cameras, and you might miss your zoom, but when you nail a shot with this lens, nothing can compare to it. The 80mm f1.2 is too large and heavy and the electric focusing all conspire to put the 50mm ahead (cheaper too). I like this lens on a crop frame camera best as the 80mm perspective is particularly flattering. I remember when in film days of the 1980s we were all told to throw our 'useless' 50mm lenses away and buy zooms - how things change!
I was tainted by all the bad press about this lens, but I'm glad I got it. The reviews I read made me paranoid, and I was pixel peeping every image for sharpness - I guess you all will too after spending this much money. I read one review that said the lens caused strange yellow banding patterning on most frames some of the time. Imagine my thoughts when this happened to me on the second day I had it - I was ready to throw the lens in the bin (well return it). But ha - I learnt that at fast shutter speeds (due to large aperture), older style fluorescent lighting causes this patterning. Motto - don't believe half the rubbish you read on blogs! My advice is to buy this lens, it'll give you great pleasure and inject a new perspective to your photography. My view is that this is a sharp, brilliant lens, but a truly idiosyncratic one - a bit like many creative geniuses. But don't buy on a whim or a must have premise, buy if you are in need of the narrow depth of field and unique images that this trait confers Enjoy, and I hope this review dispels some of the misinformation and confusion that exists out there, and particularly with prospective buyers.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
A Necessary evil
I shoot a wide variety of subject matter for my work and, because I exclusively use full frame Canon bodies and always try to use prime lenses, a 50mm is almost mandatory.
Read complete review
I shoot a wide variety of subject matter for my work and, because I exclusively use full frame Canon bodies and always try to use prime lenses, a 50mm is almost mandatory.
I have owned the EF 50mm f1.4 for years and it is a really good lens. Unfortunately, it is not a truely great one as it flares, focuses erratically and suffers from chromatic aberration, amongst other things.
I assumed the 50mm f1.2L would have to be much better because it is much heavier, many times the price and only a third of a stop faster. I was wrong. For examle, compared to my Mk. I 85mm f1.2, (which it is in the same "family" as) it is very poor. The later 50mm f1.2 should have built on this 20 year old design but it went backwards.
In some ways it is better than the EF 50mm f1.4. It has less flare and it is sharper to about f4 but it still has chromatic aberration, it is only acceptably sharp in the centre and it really suffers with back focussing and erratic focussing problems. I have paid Canon several times to try and get this lens to focus reliably, ( and had it done under warranty too). I have now given up and and accepted the best compromise after many hours of micro-adjustment with my camera bodies. I just shoot a lot of frames wherever possible. If I can get away with it I manually focus with live view or, even better, use my old Zeiss f1.4 plannar. In all I have 9 L series lenses and this has been the only truly troublesome one. My colleges are having similar problems with them. I would be o.k. about it if this didn't cost almost as much as the last car I could afford.
Australian photographers are rarely rich but, like other professionals, we get in trouble if we don't produce sharp photos. If you need the best compromise to do your job and they pay you well enough, this might be it but, otherwise, get the 50mm f1.4. It is a fraction of the price and, in in many ways it is the better lens. Now, why did I sell mine? . . . Better get another one.
REVIEWS
Reviewed by 700 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have nothing bad to say about this lens. It is amazing. Has a beautiful soft background blur,very fast and well built. This lens is a keeper.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I use this lens for portraits and weddings. It's a great lens, but tends to be slightly fuzzy even when I adjusted my micro focus adjustment.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Nice Bokeh ,fast auto-focus!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Shoots great indoors, low light. I use the Al Servo setting and it's taking me some time getting used to its focusing style, but super creamy bokeh is a given 100% of the time. It took me a while to justify buying this lens, having never shot with a standard lens before, but it took me no time to adjust to it. Great purchase!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
A must-have lens!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
This lens is as bipolar as the reviews make it out to be. I'll start this off by saying that I returned my copy of the 50L after one week of use. When this lens focused correctly, it spat out some phenomenal photos that were distinctive and beautifully rendered. It sucks in light like a super massive black hole and isolates subjects from just about anything. The lens is light (compared to the 85L and 70-200 - weighs pretty much the same as a 135L or 35L) and compact. It feels well built too. I bought it primarily for use while traveling in inclement weather but never got to use it in any of that so I cannot comment on the weather sealing. Definitely focuses faster than the 85L but slower than the 35L.
That said, there are quite a few negatives regarding the 50L. If you have a 5D mark II, turn around now and buy another lens (or buy a 5D mark III or 1Dx or even a 1D3/4). This lens just does not get along with the AF system on the 5D mark II. I calibrated it no less than 3 times and STILL had erratic focusing. Sometimes, it would nail critical focus and the image would turn out wonderfully. Other times, I would have the center AF point directly pointed at a very contrast-y subject and the lens would back-focus about a foot - sometimes more. It is soft wide open - not just glowing and ethereal - there is a distinct lack of sharpness wide open. If you own an 85L, it is softer than that by a fairly wide margin when both are wide open. There is a lack of contrast and lack of color saturation when compared to the 85L as well - again, when both are wide open. Stopped down to f/2.0 - the 50L is tack sharp, but if you have to stop down to f/2.0 then why would you buy this lens in the first place? That, and between f/1.8 and f/4 there is a significant focus shift within 2 meters of the camera. Past f/4 and the focal plane is wide enough to compensate, at f/1.2 and f/1.4 the plane is right where it should be. Also, because this lens doesn't have a floating element, the focal plane is strongly curved so the focus/recompose technique completely falls flat on its face when using this lens.
In the end, I would have kept this lens if it focused correctly even 80% of the time but at a 20-30% hit rate on my 5D2 and a 60-70% hit rate on my 1D3, I just couldn't see myself ever trusting this lens for fast shooting so I will be sticking with my trusted 35/85 combination.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have no regrets spending the money on this lens. Pricey but sturdy and reliable, and produces beautiful images.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am shooting with the Canon 5d markiii, full frame.
> The 35L vs 50L.
The 35L is great. Why?
It's good for people and stuff. Good in low light, obviously.
The 50L is very close FL wise to the 35L, so it will work for virtually all of the same things as a 35L.
But it will be a little more special (color, bokeh, 1.2, build).
The 50L is great for people.
It's the very good walkabout FL on a FF.
If I want to go on a vacation and bring just one lens, 50L it can really do it all.
- the candids, the portraits, the landscape, evening.
There is something about the 50L, the rendering... yea you knew that.
But 50mm is really a great place to be. When you have it, you just feel good. You are versatile!
The 35L does everything well, but there's isn't anything special about it.
Had it, sold it.
I now have three primes 24Lii 50L 85L.
Think about that, wide, standard, and portrait. Simple right?
> 35L vs 50L.
> Owning 50L and 85L, what is unholy about this?
The 85mm is a MAJOR commitment, financially and also it's practicality.
You KNOW when you have the 85L on your body, or in your bag.
The 50L feels like it was made to be mounted to my 5D.
It balances it out like magic, it JUST FEELS right.
What is the best focal length for you? Who knows.
The 85mm is obviously the most popular/perfect for portrait.
But the 50mm is there for portrait and everything else, too.
It allows me to be closer to kids. I love having both.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Just used this lens for the first time at a wedding. SO much quieter and more effective than the 50mm 1.8 I had been using!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I have owned this lens for 3 years now, I unfortunately was a victim of a robbery and lost all my gear. This was the first lens I immediately replaced, of the 5 I owned. I use it all the time, and for so many different applications. No complaints!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am a commercial and portrait photographer and have used the 50mm f/1.4 lens for years. I have the 85 f/1.2 and have been loving it. I was realizing that I might actually want to buy the 50 f/1.2 and possibly get rid of the 85mm and the 50mm that I already have.
So, I pulled the trigger. And I love the feel, the size and the weight. It is a beautiful lens, but I wanted to see some improvement over the f/1.4 lens and at least as good wide open as the 85 1.2. Heck, if the 50 1.2 was at least as good as the 50 1.4, I would have been happy.
I did a very simple test. Mounted my camera on a tripod, focused on the door next to my desk and shot both the 1.2 and 1.4 with the same settings (set to 1.6). The 1.2 just seemed a little blurry, not as sharp as the 1.4. So I did it again, shot several different subjects and downloaded the images to have a huge view on my computer and not just on my tiny lcd of my camera.
Every image was the same... not sharp. I began to do some searching online an found several articles on the back focus issue of the 50mm 1.2 lens. This was enough for me to decide to return the lens and hold off until Canon fixes this issue.
Two stars for the build, look and feel... but that's not a reason to pay this much for a lens.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Absolutely no vignetting wide open on my 5D3. Also, very sharp at f/1.2, and excellent sharpness throughout all f/ stops from f/4 on up.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Great for portraits or just walking around. Excellent bokeh, sharp, and fast focusing.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I use the 50mm L for portrait photogrpahy. It's sharp and not too heavy or bulky. I'm very pleased with it so far.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
A must have for anyone who wants to be a serious photographer. Sharp images, exceptional build quality. It's a no brainer! Get this lens. Don't let those nitpickers make you second guess yourself. It's heaver than I thought it was going to be, but I like that in my equipment.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I've been shooting weddings primarily with the 35L, 85L and 135L, but I added the 50L to my gear upon seeing some pretty flawless SOOCs from second shooters who use the 50L. It's much faster to focus than the 85L (v.1), and it plays well with sun flare, if I choose to go there. Great focal length for family portrait sessions, too. (I was using the Sigma 50 1.4 prior to springing for the 50L.)
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
I am so happy that I purchased this lens! I have gravely needed to upgrade my photography equipment (I photograph weddings and landscapes). I read so endless reviews, spoke with some of my photography idols, trying to decide what my next big purchase would be.
Everything pointed to the 50mm F/1.2 and I couldn't be happier! Very fast, near-silent AF, beautiful bokeh, and solid construction. I live in the rainy Pacific Northwest and the water resistance is definitely a major plus.
The lens is very heavy, but that is to be expected with its glass.
I have a feeling this guys is going to be go-to lens for years to come!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
Was a little scared about the focusing issues but mine works fine on my 5d3.
Would not recommend it to my fotog friends because I do not need the competition.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
It's amazing lens I recommend every one to get it
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon Normal EF 50mm f/1.2L USM Autofocus Lens:
If you're looking for a versatile lens, this is the one. The clear pictures you'll get from it will amaze you and your portraits will turn out great. With its f1.2 capability you'll seldom use flash. If however, you're looking for either zoom or wide angle, this won't work too well. I found myself going further back really far to try to capture as much of the scenery as possible so this won't be too usefull for those up-close architecture shots.