We are not accepting orders at this time. Online ordering will resume Monday, May 28th at 9:45PM EDT. Our SuperStore and offices are currently closed and will reopen on Tuesday, May 29th at 9:00AM EDT.
We apologize for any inconvenience and appreciate your patronage.
AF not supported by D40, D60, D3000, D3100 & D5000 cameras
The Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens is a fast telephoto zoom lens, ideal for indoor sports photography and photojournalism in dim light. It incorporates Autofocus (AF) and Internal Focusing (IF) technology and ED glass for sharp pictures.
Note! AF not supported by D40, D60, D3000, D3100 & D5000 cameras
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Focal Length | 80 - 200 mm |
| Aperture |
Maximum: f/2.8 Minimum: f/22 |
| Camera Mount Type | Nikon F |
| Format Compatibility |
Nikon FX/35mm Film Nikon DX |
| Angle of View |
30° - 12° DX Picture Angle: 20° - 8° |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 4.92' (1.5 m) |
| Magnification | 0.24x |
| Maximum Reproduction Ratio | 1:4.16 |
| Groups/Elements | 11/16 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
| Features | |
|---|---|
| Image Stabilization | No |
| Autofocus | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | Yes |
| Physical | |
|---|---|
| Filter Thread | 77 mm |
| Dimensions (DxL) | Approx. 3.4 x 7.4" (8.64 x 18.80 cm) |
| Weight | 2.86 lb (1.30 kg) |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Pro pictures at a fair price
I have owned the 70-200 2.8 VR1 and I currently own this lens. I shoot pictures as a hobby. I do not get paid for my work. I sold the 70-200 when...Read complete review
I have owned the 70-200 2.8 VR1 and I currently own this lens. I shoot pictures as a hobby. I do not get paid for my work. I sold the 70-200 when the price went up and bought this lens because this is substantially lower in price for pretty much the same results.
If you're situation is similar to mine. The 80-200 2.8 is more lens than you will ever need.
The 70-200 2.8 has AF-S and VR but if you have a halfway decent camera, AF-S should not really matter as your camera's motor should do you well. VR is only useful when you are taking pictures of static subjects. VR will do you no good if you think it will aid you during action photography. You pay almost 80-90% more for these two features. If you are not getting paid for your work, these features are a waste of money and two more things that are liable to break or malfunction.
From my perspective, both lenses pretty much produce similar pictures. Bokeh is excellent on both. You can make the argument that the 70-200VR will suffer less from chromatic aberrations due to the extra ED elements but then again, the average person will never notice something like this or you can just avoid tricky light. Bottom line is both will produce sharp, color-rich, and amazing pictures with very pleasing bokeh. You can take the same picture with both lenses and I do not believe you will be able to tell the difference; -I can't.
I like the fact that the 80-200 is smaller in size and weight so you can take it out in public without attracting too much attention.
Both lenses are built rock-solid. Build quality was never an issue for me with either lens. Of course, the 80-200 has plastic threads on the front but you just have to be careful not to cross-thread a filter. The 80-200 also does not have that rubber gasket by the mount. Again, I don't think it's an issue unless you are really abusing your equipment.
Also I like the cool-looking flower petal hood of the 70-200. You have to admit, the flower petal hood will make you look cool. You have to go and buy a hood for the 80-200 for almost thirty bucks and it doesn't even look nice. But I recommend you buy it because it offers protection. I personally don't waste money on UV filters, so a hood is needed for protecting the front element from bumps.
Even at the current price, this lens is an excellent value. Four or five years ago, you could get the same lens on rebate from Nikon for around eight hundred.
Be sure your camera has an AF motor as this lens does not have an internal motor. I still don't understand why some people buy the most expensive camera but skimp on the lens. Invest in the lens and buy only as much camera as you need.
You will be very happy with this lens. Most people will not need AF-S and the VR. I highly recommend this lens.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
Problems with focus in 135-200 range
This lens has great problem with focus on 2.8 opening in 135mm to 200mm range. It is absolutly unusable for me at 200mm with 2.8 opening on my D300. Front-focus is so tremendous that ...Read complete review
This lens has great problem with focus on 2.8 opening in 135mm to 200mm range. It is absolutly unusable for me at 200mm with 2.8 opening on my D300. Front-focus is so tremendous that I'm unable to compensate it with AF fine-tune in camera body. Worst thing about this lens is that it is impossible to take it to the service for fine-tuning cause it is AF, not AF-S lens.
This pronlem is common for this lens not just for my copy.
You can search the web for this very well known problem: "Nikon 80-200 mm 2.8 focus issue"
Reviewed by 285 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
This gem of a lens is some of the best bang for the buck. It is a sharp lens. Wide open gets soft, but it will on any glass. This has no VR, but so what. If you know how to shoot, you won't need VR. Great lens with solid construction and fast, accurate focus!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I would highly recommend this product to anyone who is interesting in getting a nice high quality zoom. I use this 80-200 2.8 zoom on my Nikon D7000, it performs with high quality photos every time. It has yet to let me down and the price is amazing! Compared to the 70-200 this performs just as well for half the price!
The AF isn't instant but I shot 5 baseball games and a soccer game and have yet to have a problem with the focusing being an issue. If you are worried about it not having an internal focusing motor, don't! It is such a superb lens I can't speak about how much I enjoy using this and it isn't as heavy as one would think.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
What can I say? This lens is solidly built and oozes quality throughout. Yes, it's rather heavy. And it's crazy that I use it on a Sony Nex-7 body via a Novoflex adapter. I would not recommend a cheap adapter with this beast. Besides the cool factor, I do get great results with the help of a monopod... and some compliments along the way. A passerby glanced at my set up and commented "Now THAT'S a camera!" I guess, like it or not, SIZE DOES MATTER :)
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
Wildlife/Scenic
Portraits
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I recently bought the Nikkor 80-200/f2.8 ED for shooting kid's sports. It does not have the silent wave or VR. I decided not to spend the extra money but more importantly did not want more technology that could break. I have now shot about a dozen soccer and lacrosse games with the new lens. Compared to my Nikkor 70-300/f4-5.6 ED, the new lens has significantly improved my percentage of sharp images. It seems to focus faster than my older one but I can't tell if that is because of the increased light due to the larger aperture or just a sharper lens. The increased light certainly helps me get more depth of field at shutter speeds that capture the action. In any case, it is now my lens of choice for sports. I have been using the lens on a D300 and D700. This is not a walk around lens. I always use a monopod to shoot the games.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
This lens is awesome. The bokeh is fantastic. I've used it mainly for people shots in medium to low light, and the 2.8 really helps. It's heavy and has no VR, but it's built like a tank. My handheld shots came out quite good, but after a while my shoulders wanted a tripod/monopod.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I am a professional photographer. I shoot mainly travel, beauty and fine art images. This is a workhorse for me. I didn't want to spend the extra money on the 70-200 2.8 VR because I don't have any use for the VR...and this lens is ultra sharp and I would say just as sharp as the Nano glass on the VR.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I had the same lens for 12 years and lately I was using it with my second body (D300), while shooting wide angles with my primary body (D700). It's great to have the 80-200 ready to grasp and shoot. Unfortunatly while doing a large group shot with my 16-35mm, I fell from a chair! and my 80-200 that I had hanging from my shoulder landed lens first on the pavement. I'm a freelancer but also being a father of two I have to balance my budget so when I was looking for a replacement lens a new 80-200 was not only one I worked with for many years but also a huge saving from the new state of the art 70-200. I find my new 80-200 to be sharp and fast. Some times I change it to my D700 and have more MM choices to compose with. I'm glad they're still making this great lens.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I bought this lens to use at a baseball game. I didn't think I would use it for pictures of our grandson or our dogs but that is what I am using it for. Crystal clear pictures with great details.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I already own the 70-200 VR II for photo and it is my favorite Nikon lens. I purchased the 80-200 for video adapted to Sony F3 but it was not parfocal, and had much breathing. It is not nearly as nice as the 70-200 in addition to no VR but less than half the price. Very well made but seems dated in design. It was not good for my purposes so I returned it.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
Everything is as advertised. Substantial well made lens. I'll enjoy using this lens. I am now lusting for another Nikon Prime Lens. Nikkor AF-S 17-35mm F/2.8D ED IF. Hopefully I'll win the drawing to give me a good start on acquiring this wide angle zoom
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I am now using this lens on the D7000,and have seen a further jump in resolution/clarity.
Prior to that it was paired with a D200,a very good combo,but the D7000/nIKOR 80-200MM F/2.8 is exceptional.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I use this lens for indoor basketball photography. The pictures were so clear! However, it is a little too big of a zoom for me because I had to sit so far away from the action in order to get the shot.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
Quick and sharp, I'm using it every chance I get
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I've been deciding for some time now between the 70-200 and the 80-200 and finally decided to get the 80-200. the lens is not as heavy as some people say it is. it works well for me, i usually go to the zoo or the everglades and shoot wildlife. hasn't given me any problems yet and I'm super happy with the results.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
This is definitely worth the investment. I don't think I will miss the Vr function for the price. This is probably the best first pro glass you can buy. It is just so versatile that it fits several applications. It is heavy but not heavy considering the quality and amount of glass that is in it. I use it with a dx sensor. The d7000 is a great fit and focuses extremely fast. I would recommend this to anyone.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
Fits my needs for sports and portraits. Love the 2.8!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I've owned my Nikon D90 for 3 years, and purchased it mostly to take pictures of my kids athletic events. I purchased a Nikkor 70-300mm lens some time ago in Singapore, which was a good lens for outdoor sports with a lot of natural light. However, it was an average lens when I moved indoor to shoot volleyball. I recently purchased the Nikkor 80-20mm f/2.8D lens to handle the indoor duties, and the only disappointment is that I didn't purchase it sooner. The 2.8 aperture is excellent for indoor sports, and freezes the ball in flight. The pictures are sharp, and the color is brilliant. I heard a lot of negatives regarding the weight of the lens, but that really isn't an issue, especially when I'm shooting at higher shutter speeds to capture the action. It's an easy lens to use. I would highly recommend it to anyone that is shooting indoor sports or activities and requires a zoom lens.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
The best zoom lens throughout the Nikon line. The most used lens in my Nikon collection since I take a lot of indoor basketball games.Great for low lighting situation, color, focus and bokeh is excellent, no complaint on this lens especially considering it is "only" [$]. Focus is sometimes hesitated especially when half of the frame has moving object at the direction of "depth of field". Lateral movement is fine. Not sure if I have not found right way of using my D3s' autofocus mode yet...
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Nikon AF Zoom-Nikkor 80-200mm f/2.8D ED Lens:
I bought this lens specifically to shoot indoor sports and I could not be happier. In the 2 short weeks I have been using it, my indoor sports shots have been outstanding. Even shooting hockey THROUGH the glass the picture are crisp and clear. It is heavy but a monopod solves that problem. I am using it with the D90 body and AF works great. Five stars!!
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »