Celestron's erect image diagonals are Amici prism designs, allowing you to look into the telescope at a 45° angle at images which are upright and laterally correct. This is extremely comfortable for terrestrial viewing or when sharing the viewing experience between those of varying heights, and comes at the expense of a loss in brightness versus a 90° diagonal-which would show images upright but laterally reversed.
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
REVIEWS
Reviewed by 3 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-3
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Celestron 45-Degree Erect Diagonal (1.25"):
Would be great for terrestrial viewing and the low price attracted me, but...
The main item of note is that the undersized prism has a clear aperture 18mm in diameter compared with 28mm for the standard 1.25" 90 degree model supplied with Celestron SCT's. Also,contrary to the illustration it has only one screw to affix the eyepiece and no grubb screw in the side to adjust the prism. The point of focus is quite different than when using the standard 90 degree prism.
This 18mm diameter prism means that when using low magnification eyepieces you suffer vignetting around the edges. For example the field lens of the 40mm Plossl that came with my C11 uses the full inside diameter of the barrel of 28.5mm and vignetting is bad, and the edge of the field is not visible. A standard 25mm plossl has a 23mm wide lens and vignetting is very apparent. It is not until you get to the 8-24mm Celestron zoom with a small field lens of 16mm (narrow low power field) or higher powers like a 12.5mm plossl (11mm wide lens) that vignetting is not apparent.
So this effectively rules out low power wider angle views. Examining the image critically I formed the view that the vignetting encroached a tad more at the lower edge of the field. The images also appear to vary very slightly in focus and quality over the field, but not on one axis as you might expect if it was an alignment issue.
I felt that the image was not quite as bright nor quite as sharp as with the 90 degree model, but it was a very close call. I was trying to be as critical as I could, switching from one diagonal to the other using the same eyepieces. I believe, that the differences were subtle, but apparent. I used Jupiter and the galilean satellites on my C11 for my comparison and they are always a good test.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Celestron 45-Degree Erect Diagonal (1.25"):
I use this product constantly for entertaiment.
A good caracteris is the clarity and good angle for view.
Nothing, is very great.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Celestron 45-Degree Erect Diagonal (1.25"):
I like this product because it does what it says. Lets you see the images in a correct horizontal and lateral views. One thing that is very important is that you have to make sure you have a Barlow lens to do your viewing. Very easy to set up and use.
Displaying reviews 1-3