This item is backordered by the manufacturer.
A lens and a memory card are required but not included with this camera. Please be sure to purchase a lens and a memory card for this camera.
The Canon EOS 1D Mark IV offers advanced photographic and video imaging possibilities for demanding professionals. Boasting a 16.1 Megapixel APS-H sized sensor, Dual DIGIC 4 Image Processors, and a completely redesigned 45-point AF system, the 1D Mark IV builds upon the success of the legendary 1D series with expanded ISO performance (up to ISO 102,400), HD video recording, and 10 frames-per-second continuous shooting.
The 1D Mark IV's all new autofocus system employs 45 AF points, 39 of which are cross-type. All focus points can be selected automatically or manually, and programmed for priority based on the portrait or landscape orientation of the camera. New AI Servo II AF uses advanced algorithms to track moving subjects with precision and accuracy, even under the most difficult shooting conditions. An improved 63-zone metering system analyzes the frame for optimal exposure.
True 1080p HD video can be recorded at 24 (23.976), 25, or 30 (29.97) frames per second for better compatibility with non-linear editing systems. 720p HD and 640 x 480 SD video are captured at 50 or 60 (59.94) frames per second, offering the smoothest method of recording action subjects. An integrated mono microphone records spontaneous audio with video, while a 3.5mm stereo input offers higher quality options for professional applications.
Additional features include environmentally sealed magnesium-alloy construction, integrated sensor cleaning, and a 300,000 exposure shutter rating. With all this and more, the Canon EOS 1D Mark IV represents a complete photo and video solution for professional photographers and filmmakers.
When shooting HD video in AE modes, the EOS-1D Mark IV employs Center Weighted average metering to help ensure stable motion-picture exposure with the camera automatically selecting the ISO speed, shutter and aperture. Full manual exposure control is also available while shooting video when the camera is set to Manual mode.
Video can be captured at 1920 x 1080 resolution at frame rates of 24 (23.976), 25 or 30 (29.97) frames per second, for up to 4GB per clip. Movies are saved as MOV files and can be viewed in Full HD with HDMI output. Other recording sizes include HD at 1280 x 720 (50/60 (59.94) fps) or SD/VGA at 640 x 480 (50/60 (59.94) fps). The EOS-1D Mark IV has a built-in microphone for simple mono recording and stereo sound can be recorded through a self-powered external microphone.
| Imaging | |
|---|---|
| Camera Type | Digital SLR with Interchangeable lenses |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF |
| Camera Format | APS-H / (1.3x Crop Factor) |
| Resolution |
Effective Pixels: 17.0 Megapixels Max Resolution: 16 MP: 4896 x 3264 |
| Sensor Type / Size | CMOS, 27.9 x 18.6 mm |
| File Formats |
Still Images: JPEG, RAW Movies: MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV Audio: Linear PCM, WAV |
| Bit Depth | 14-bit |
| Memory Card Type |
CompactFlash SD SDHC |
| AV Recording | |
|---|---|
| Video Recording | Yes |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2 |
| Audio Recording | With Video + Voice Memo, Stereo, Via Optional External Mic |
| Focus Control | |
|---|---|
| Focus Type | Auto & Manual |
| Focus Mode | Single-servo AF (S), Continuous-servo AF (C), Manual Focus (M) |
| Autofocus Points | 45 |
| Viewfinder/Display | |
|---|---|
| Viewfinder Type | Pentaprism |
| Viewfinder Coverage | 100% |
| Viewfinder Magnification | Approx. 0.76x |
| Diopter Adjustment | - 3.0 to +1.0 m |
| Display Screen | 3" Rear Screen LCD (920000) |
| Screen Coverage | 100% |
| Live View | Yes |
| Exposure Control | |
|---|---|
| ISO Sensitivity | 50-25600 |
| Shutter |
Type: Electronic & Mechanical Speed: 30 - 1/8000 sec |
| Remote Control | Canon N3 type terminal (Optional) |
| Metering Method | Spot metering, Center-weighted average metering, Multi-zone metering |
| Exposure Modes |
Modes: AE Lock, Aperture Priority, Manual, Program, Shutter Priority Compensation: -3 EV to +3 EV (in 0.33 EV steps) |
| White Balance Modes | Auto, Manual |
| Flash | |
|---|---|
| Continuous Shooting | Up to 10 fps |
| External Flash Connection | Hot Shoe, PC Terminal |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Start-up Time | 0.1 Seconds |
| Self Timer | 2 sec, 10 sec |
| Connectivity | AV Output, HDMI C (Mini), USB 2.0 |
| Power | |
|---|---|
| Battery | 1x LP-E4 Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Battery Pack |
| AC Power Adapter | ACK-E4 (Optional) |
| Operating/Storage Temperature |
Operating 32 to 113 °F (0 to 45 °C) Humidity: 0 - 85% |
| Physical | |
|---|---|
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | 6.1 x 6.2 x 3.1" / 15.49 x 15.75 x 7.87 cm Body Only |
| Weight | 41.6 oz / 1.18 kg |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Best DSLR I've ever owned
I've had this since they were released. I've owned the 1D, 1Ds, 1Dsii, 1Dii and now the 5Dii and the 1Div. This is my favorite digital DSLR ever. It performs nearly instantly ...Read complete review
I've had this since they were released. I've owned the 1D, 1Ds, 1Dsii, 1Dii and now the 5Dii and the 1Div. This is my favorite digital DSLR ever. It performs nearly instantly and hits focus spot on [that said, I had to send EVERY other single D body to Canon for focus repair]. This was great right out of the box. Lighter. Faster. And resolution just below 1DsII (due to pixel density).
I shoot lifestyle (not sports) so my subjects ARE moving, but not super fast. I'm shooting wide open apertures nearly all the time and focus is critical. You HAVE to put the AF sensor on the subject's eyes to get sharp focus at wide apertures since DOF is so shallow and you CANNOT focus and recompose [that's a function of all DSLR's at wide apertures, close distance, etc]. Color and sharpness are good (though again, I'd give the slight edge to the 1DsII).
Body and build are great. Lighter and better batteries. The LCD is a huge step up from the MKii models, as is the built-in JPEG within the RAW for checking focus on the fly. The dust removal thing is no gimmick. With previous cameras used to clean the sensor every 15 days or so - have only blown dust out of this once and never had to wipe the sensor ever. Nice.
Like any mass-produced product (even at $Xxxx) there will be QC issues. If you get a lemon; exchange it or get it fixed. CPS has always been great for me. Your mileage may vary.
TTL flash is better, but much as I like Canon, it's just not Nikon good. Much better than before for sure, but still a bit unpredictable. I've been shooting professionally for 12 years with maybe 1,000,000 exposures, so take this FWIW.
As to low-light performance. I just did a shoot via moonlight -- with a live model on set outdoors. Yes. Live model lit only by moonlight. A sheriff on site kept asking me, "but where is the LIGHT coming from?!!!" He just could not believe it was moonlight doing the work. But I've got images to show for it.
As with any technology, the next one will be better… but till then, I'll be making and selling images with the camera of today in hand. And this one I like very much. If it were full frame, it just might be the last DSLR I ever bought (but what mfg. wants to make that camera?) It's for lack of FF that I take a star off. I'd trade 2 fps for a bigger sensor.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
Lipstick on a Pig
As of now, there are three groups of reviewers for the Canon 1D Mark IV camera.The first group are the ones who have upgraded from consumer/prosumer bodies, i.e. 40D, 50D, 5DMII. ...Read complete review
As of now, there are three groups of reviewers for the Canon 1D Mark IV camera.The first group are the ones who have upgraded from consumer/prosumer bodies, i.e. 40D, 50D, 5DMII. Most of these reviewers gave the Mark IV high marks. Well, that's understandable since moving up to the 1D series is, indeed, a worthwhile upgrade. And the Mark IV does outperform all of consumer/prosumer bodies in many categories, even the auto focus, up to a certain point.The second group are the one who are in denial. They are the ones who upgraded from the Mark II, Mark IIN , or the Mark III. They see the Mark IV's shortcoming, and poor performance, but cannot bring themselves to the realization that after spending $5000.00, their new camera is not much better than the Mark III, and certainly, and without a doubt, not as good as the Mark IIN. For whatever reason it may be, they are trying desperately to convince themselves that their purchase is a good one. They are the ones who, after realizing what a poor performer the Mark IV is in areas that really count the most, go on boasting about the camera's other features (high megapixel count, high frame rate, 1080P video), in hopes of making themselves feel better about their purchase. With all due respect to those reviewers, let me just say this: no matter what feature a camera has, or how many gigapixels a camera has, or any other feature it might have that separates it from the rest of its competition, that said camera is worthless if it cannot produce focused images. What good is a large image if it's out of focus? No amount of pixels is going to help it. What are you going to tell your client, "hey, I have a great sequence of the winning goal/shot/peak moment, and you can have prints the size of the Empire State Building, too, just overlook the simple fact that the image/images are out of focus".?The third group are the ones who are realistic, and objective in their review. What I mean by that is they have come to the conclusion that the Mark IV is a great disappointment when it comes to the focus/autofocus department. And not to mention falling short when competing against Nikon's D3S, in just about most categories, except the megapixel count and the 1080P video.I belong in the third group. I have shot about 2000 frames with the Mark IV, in varying conditions, and the camera's AF performed pretty much exactly as Rob Galbraith stated in his review of this body. POORLY. I do not have the Mark III (I opted to skip that party) to compare the Mark IV with, but I do have a Mark IIN, and I'm here to say that if Canon would simply take the Mark IIN's AF system, as is, and put it in the Mark IV body, along with the 39 cross type AF selection points, that they may have a winner on their hands, or at least they won't have as big a disappointment as the Mark III, and the Mark IV.During a soccer game, on a cloudless, sunny sky, the camera's AF had a difficult time. Whether using the single shot mode, or AI Servo mode, the AF system was consistently inconsistent. In single shot mode, on static subjects, the camera would confirm focus acquisition when in fact the subject is out of focus, which would be confirmed later after zooming in to verify focus. This problem happened on a regular basis, with different lenses. And different a bodyIn AI servo mode, the camera sometimes refuses to focus, and can be clearly seen in the viewfinder that the subject is out of focus, yet the focus points light up indicating focus and the camera is firing away as though the camera has acquired focus. I do not recall ever experiencing such behavior with the Mark IIN.Another problem with the AF system is the low light focusing ability (inability?). There were many occasions where the light was dim, and the Mark IV would just hunt and hunt trying to acquire focus. Same situation, same lens, the Mark IIN would instantly acquire focus. The Mark IV was finally able to acquire focus, in the same dimly lit conditions, with the help of a speedlite's IR beam. But then again, the Mark IIN did not need that kind of help. Now, will someone please give me a logical explanation as to why a new and improved AF system does not perform as well as an older version?There is a well known photographer, whose name I will not mention, but he is the one who brought attention to the Mark III's problems, and had warned Canon of those problems, which Canon chose to ignore and release the Mark III anyway. That same gentleman has tested the Mark IV, and he concluded that it, too, has lots of problems with the AF system. I didn't want to believe it, at first, but went ahead and purchased the Mark IV. Needless to say, I have experienced the same problems that he outlined in his review. I'm sure most photographers know to whom I am referring. If not, do a search on the Mark III reviews, and you will find what I'm talking about.[...] The serial numbers of the two bodies were clearly from a different batch. When I contacted Canon C.P.S. to ask about these problems, they said, and I quote, "having used both the 1D Mark III and the 1D Mark IV, I can tell you thatthe focus capability of the 1D Mark IV is a nice improvement over the 1DMark III, assuming of course that the camera is working as it should andused correctly".A nice improvement? When I read that, my first impression was that of mild shock, but also an "aha" moment. When the Mark IV was introduced, it was supposed to have all the Mark III's problems fixed. But now Canon says that the AF is a "nice improvement" over the Mark III. Well that confirmed to me that Canon never really overhauled the flawed system. Obviously Canon has no confidence in their new AF system; otherwise they wouldn't just be saying that it is a "nice improvement". If the AF system was a good one, they would be more confident, and they would use better language to describe it. Apparently, the system is still flawed. Not much has been fixed.I guess you can say that Canon just put lipstick on a pig, and called it the Mark IV.Another thing that C.P.S. told me is that the problems that I'm experiencing could be due an alignment problem with the camera. So let me get this straight: that's two different cameras, from two entirely different batches, and they both have the same problems. According to Canon, this is an isolated problem. HA!So as to those positive reviews out there, I am going to have to disagree with them. I don't care what Canon says, or what other reviewers are saying, I know what I have experienced with this new model, and it ain't pretty.
Reviewed by 175 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Got it very quick from B&H. Open Box and check the shutter count was Zero as expected. Take a few shots in door, low light at ISO 1600 and 3200, love it. Take it out for Bird in Flight, nail the Osprey in bad weather. Focus Tracking is amazing. Image Quality at ISO 1600 and 3200 is as I expected. Love it.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I upgraded to the Mark IV from the 7D as I really needed better performance at ISO 6400 than can be squeezed out of the 7D. I opted for this over waiting for the 1DX due its price, availability, and the extra reach the 1.3 crop sensor provides over the full frame 1DX.
ISO performance seems to be a littel more than 1 stop better (6400 looks much better than 7D 3200, but has noise to take out with lightroom).
The "keeper" rate is much improved over the 7D and that, along with the high speed frame rate, makes for 2-3x the number in-focus photos to process after a sports event. I took 5800 in my first outing.
I miss a few features of the 7D such as the C1/C2/C3 custom options on the dial that made it easy to swap from high speed sport shooting to single-shot/low iso/longer exposure candid shots.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I have been using this camera for about a year now. It replaced one of my 5DMkIIs. I sold one 5D MkII and a 1D Mk II in anticipation of purchasing this upgrade. What a difference in performance.
I was concerned after hearing all the horror stories about the 1D MkIII's focus issues. Canon has totally fixed the auto focus system in this camera. I say this when I compare it's performance vs my 1D MkIIN and 5DMkII's auto focus. I shoot a lot of sports and the 5D MkII cannot keep up with fast, erratically moving subjects. The 1D MkIIN was much better and the 1D MkIV was erratic at first based on some of the settings. I later did some research online and found that because of the customization options you can improve the responsiveness and accuracy of the system.
Many of the suggestions worked great. I have had great results shooting football, basketball, soccer, field hockey, and many nature shots of birds. Look for me on facebook or flickr to see some of the images. Dave Trotman-Wilkns.
Have not had any other issues with the camera, metering, exposure and video were top notch. One caveat is the video on button when you use the center "Set" button. when carrying the camera next to your body it is too easy to activate video recording when it rubs against your body.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Great for high speed action photography under all conditions. The higher ISO range allows for excellent images in low light situations. Previous to this purchase I was using the Mark IIn which is a great camera in its own right but the Mark IV is a step up in all respects. The sharpness/clarity and color saturation are excellent even in the low light situations where I shoot at ISO 2500 without any noticeable noise. The price is high but worth it if you shoot sports particularly of the indoor variety.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Unlike most pros I could only afford on body and it has to do everything for me. Events, portraits, grin & grab etc. I primarily bought this camera as a replacement for my Nikon D3s as I wanted to see how the other half lived and am very satisfied with my decision. The image quality and color is good, speed etc.
It's a nice camera, but the control dials/button layout is entirely different than what I'm used to, not very intuitive.
On another note, if your planning on using a Eye-Fi card with this unit as I was, my data transfer rate is painfully slow. Maybe the magnesium body interferes with WiFi radio. I have an 802.11n network and was shooting JPEG med. I purchased Canon's Wireless File Transmitter WFT-E2 II A unit and that worked great.
The GOOD: Image quality, color, speed etc.
The BAD: Price, weight and everything is backwards from Nikon. Oh well, LOL!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
This is my 2nd Canon Mark IV body, and I would highly recommend it! I am a full-time professional photographer, and I use this for anything from studio work, including h.s. seniors, family portraits, newborns, commercial/product photography, etc., to on-location work. I've owned 7 different Canon digital cameras, and this is by far the best camera I've owned. In fact, to date, I have two Mark IV bodies, both as my main camera and a back-up. I wouldn't change a thing!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I'm a professional photographer who for the last few years have enjoyed and loved the 5D Mark II. Sure, I got through the autofocus woes by using the center point so not a big deal. I was scared to buy this camera because of the lukewarm reviews about it and it being wedding ready. Well I chose to sell my 5D Mark II and make the jump and I have to say I've never been happier. I've spent the last few weeks getting used to it and getting it customized to my tastes and have to say if you are on the fence, there's no need to doubt whether or not this camera can handle your needs. I love the speed and the colors (as much as I love the 5DM2). I was blown away by what I saw at ISO 8000 and 12800. I thought I would miss the Full Frame but I don't - it's not that big of a change. I do miss some of the MP loss as I typically do large prints but I can deal with that. I figured weight would be an issue but honestly, I wondered if my 5D Mark II with grip and two batteries was heavier. I'm typically shoot with the 24-70 and 70-200 IS II and have been nothing but impressed. I think I'm going to finally get a 2x TC now. Oh and by the way, I chose this over the 1D X because 7K is a lot of money and I expect there will be a bit of a wait if they do make the target date of March. Also, now using the Mark IV, I doubt that with the shortages they have of this baby that the price will go down. If anything, maybe up once the price reality settles in on the 1D X.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I use this camera for day to day shooting and some professional portraiture. I would have like to waited for the 1D X for the full frame but was just a bit pricey. As it is a professional camera body the settings take a bit to get used to. However once you do it takes dynamite pictures. Taking it to Florida this week and will be shooting it a lot more. Can't wait.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
This is just great.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I shoot circle track racing and the speed that this camera has is awesome!!!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I had a 7D and sold it for this. and I'm waiting for the 1Dx as well.
I love the way it handles and it's much faster (focus) than the 5D2 which I will replace when the 1Dx comes out.
I shoot weddings mostly, fashion, portraits...
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I only have 900 clicks on this body. What I can say is the tracking is great.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Shooting Sporting Events and capturing wildlife in the outdoors.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I started out digitally with the 10D. I switched to Nikon for the D100. I then switched back to Canon because of their lens lineup and bought the 20D. I then graduated to the 1DsMKIII. I sold that, got the 1DIII, which had the worst AF ever, sold it, and switched back to Nikon and the D3, and excellent all around camera. Ya still with me?
I then switched back to Canon, again because of their glass. I got the 5DII along with the 200 f2 IS L. It was a great combination, along with my other glass, except for the banding on the 5DII, especially when pushing the exposure in PS.
I finally settled on the 1DIV and haven't looked back. I read the most popular "bad" review herein. I do not fall into the categories he enumerates. As you have read thus far, if I buy a camera and it's a pig, I don't put lipstick on it. I'll tell it like it is. The 1DIII was a pig.
The 1DIV is a whole other ball game. The IQ (image quality) is in another league. The sensor must be made of silk. Absolutely beautiful rendering, great high ISO capability, if a stop below the D3s, but great resolution, excellent speed, wonderful handling, and the focus while not perfect, but what is, hits most of the time.
I shoot a great variety of subjects, from macro to high school wrestling and baseball, to models in studio, to family photos and portraits, and the 1DIV is the best camera I've had the pleasure to shoot with.
Now that Canon has announced the 1DX, I tried it at the PhotoPlus Expo. I like it. I'm probably going to upgrade.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Possibly the last APS-H sensor size 1D series body from Canon, the MkIV is an awesome refinement of this line. I cannot think of anything this camera does not do extremely well.
Yes, it's big, heavy, and expensive, but it's Canon's flagship pro series body and it wears tht title well.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I bought the Mark IV to upgrade from a Mark IIn. The higher megapixel and higher ISO capabilities were the bigest factors in making the decision to move up. So far this camera has lived up to my expectatios.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I wanted to get a 2nd body in addition to my 5D MK II, and everything I had read and heard about this camera was just what I was looking for. Although not a full frame, but flip side to that is that it gives a little more distance with my 70-200 at just the right time. It's excellent in low-light situations and has a fast focus at those times, as well. I still go back to my 5D MK II for most portrait sessions, but this definitely has its place in my arsenal for weddings and sports photography!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
Professional portrait photographer. I had issues with the autofocus on my 5dmii and I would absolutely recommend upgrading to this camera body if you fall into that category.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I use this camera to cover college and professional level sporting events. It is simply amazing. I thought the camera I had before was good, but this one just is at a whole new level. The only con that I have is the battery life, but to be honest for what the camera is and the performance that you get it's a great battery.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon EOS 1D Mark IV SLR Digital Camera (Body Only):
I just rented the 1D MIV for the week, shot an LA Celebrity red carpet fashion shoot next to the Kodak theater, three weddings in San Francisco, and some underwater Senior session swimmer photographs in a week, and let me tell you, using the 5d, and 5dm2 (mostly for weddings) for a long time and then using the 1d MIV was an incredible gap difference. Yeah, it's not a full frame, but holy moses, mostly all my photographs straight out of 1d MIV were in focus, unlike my 5dm2 (which bites at focusing in dim light and actually having images that are in-focus). The AF on camera movement (during the fast fashion shoot in low light with my ISO cranked to 3200 and my three weddings) was freaking amazing!! Slight noise, but the 5dm2 has some noise at 3200 as well. With my 1d MIV weddings, I had a harder time culling because so many images were in-FOCUS.
Another AMAZING gesture I find with this camera is I put on slideshows at weddings the day of with JPEGs, and let me tell you, the skin tones, Image Quality, and bokeh (mostly from my 70-200L, 35L, and 85 1.8) were ABSOLUTELY so much better shot on the 1d MarkIV than my 5dm2. The skin tones were not only amazing right out of camera (due to better AWB), BUT!!!...the skin was nice and soft while the whole images was VERY sharp, which is a dichotomy. I don't get, how the image quality is vastly different from the 5dm2. I put in an order for the 1d MIV, and it's like I don't want to shoot anything else without my 1D MarkIV.
I"m going to keep my 5dm2 for the video and low light full frame necessary photographs. I shot the 1D mark IV under water last week in a 9ft. public pool for a swimmer, and I was a little bummed that my 16-35L couldn't go wide enough under water looking above me, so that's one of the issues with a non full-frame camera that I have with this camera. I'll just have to buy a wider lens. Easy fix.
Another issue I have is I did have some hunting on some of the non-contrasty subjects in low light, but still MUCH better than my 5dm2 in the dark. It's worth to me to have images in focus with beautiful IQ, and skin tones, and all. There is something definitely different from this camera than from the out of focus 5dm2. After shooting the 1d MarkIV (which actually sounds like a real camera when you press the shutter button) makes my 5dm2 feel like a cheap camera. I just wish it wasn't so pricey!
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »