Nothing’s for Everything

Share

In one scene of this season’s finale of the television series House, the only light appears to be coming from a flashlight in a character’s hand. The picture, nevertheless, is sharp and clear with a wide range of brightness and color, allowing detail to be seen even in the face of the flashlight holder, behind its beam.


The quality of the images was probably due, at least in part, to the way they were captured, with Canon EOS 5D Mark II DSLRs (digital single-lens reflex cameras), capable of acquiring HDTV images. Those cameras use one of the largest electronic image sensors, the size of a full-frame 35mm still image—twice the area of even 35mm motion picture film frames.

Bigger sensors mean greater sensitivity (ability to shoot in lower light levels without adding noise) and dynamic range (shades of gray that can be captured), wider angles, less loss of contrast and resolution due to diffraction, lower demands on lens quality, and more control over depth of field (how much appears to be in focus in the image). And it’s available for less than $2,500. So why do people continue to shoot HDTV with cameras that have smaller sensors and cost more?

One possibility is picture quality. Although the sensor in the 5D offers superb quality for still pictures, motion is something else. An electronic “rolling shutter” used to capture images, for example, can cause fixed upright lines like door frames and street-sign posts to seem to wave back and forth when the camera is panned rapidly. Vertical motion, too, can cause solid objects like tree trunks and mountains to vary their shapes. 

There are also possible undesirable picture artifacts associated with the color-filter pattern placed on the 5D’s single image sensor. Video cameras using three CCD-type (charge-coupled device) chips tend to avoid both rolling-shutter and color-filter artifacts.

Then there are operational considerations. DSLRs are designed for shooting still images. Their microphones (if any) seem like afterthoughts, likely to pick up undesired sounds such as lens adjustments. Video outputs, audio inputs, standardized time code, shoulder mounts, focus-checking viewfinder controls and the like might all be built into video cameras. Some of those can be added to DSLRs with accessories. 

Even top-of-the-line video cameras, however, are not appropriate for every application. For exceptional detail, NHK (the Japan Broadcasting Corporation) has developed cameras that can shoot images with 16 times more pixels than high-end HDTV; for motion analysis, they’ve also developed a camera that can shoot up to a million frames per second (HDTV in the U.S. has roughly 60 images per second). 

Ultra high-sensitivity cameras can shoot a black cat in a coal mine as though it were a celebrity being hit with a spotlight on stage. Immersive Media’s camera systems can shoot 360 degrees around as well as up and down, all at once, and Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute has come up with one that can shoot panoramic arcs in stereoscopic 3D (below).

Germany’s Fraunhofer Institute has come up with a camera that can shoot panoramic arcs in stereoscopic 3D

There are pill-sized camera systems—including lighting and transmission—that can be swallowed to reveal live pictures from inside a person’s alimentary canal. Mobile phone-based cameras, whatever their quality limitations, are always on hand. Exceptionally inexpensive cameras can be handed out to children.

No single camera is ideal for all purposes. But, as this season’s finale of House showed, sometimes extraordinary pictures can be made in unusual ways.

Add new comment

To deal with rolling shutter many videographers are moving the subject and not the camera. If you notice the high end DSLR videos on the net all have the subjects move and the camera moves slowly if at all.

I just bought a Canon 5D mark II and the photo image quality is Amazing...Now with that said let me also say knoledge of photography is just as important. I learned from the NYIP.com short course and it was invaluable to taking great photo's. I started out with a Canon Rebel T1i and I still use my Rebel today on every photoshoot . why because I can take some great photo's with that camera as well.  

I can not say it enough if at all possible use a tripod  or camera timer  OR off the camera shutter release or camera remote control to get amazing clear photo's....well as long as your camera setting are correct, background, lighting , photo composition....on and on and on....

I've been using the Canon EOS5D MkII since it first came on the market. As a video man, the ergonomics drove me crazy until I accepted the limitations and learned to work with them. Line dropping vertical resolution exaggerates aliaising on horizontal lines and to avoid this, use a tripod at all times if possible, or work with an IS lens. As mentioned above, use subject movement rather than camera movement. and most importantly, use depth of field control to soften your background - which has all the fine detail that will alias. My suggestion is to watch a few really well shot movies, like "Passage to India" and observe the excellent camera techniques evident there. Control of depth of field is vital in maintaining the focus of attention on the action that you wish the viewer to be involved in. This is a part of the film makers art that has been lost with video and the infinite depth of field lenses.

The gorgeous thing about the Canon EOS 5D Mkii is the stunning low light performance. Working with my Nikon 50mm F1.2 on adaptor - I recently shot dancers in a low light club using ambient only. Post processing made it look stunning - and virtually no grain. Incredible realtime depth of field control gives a new depth and perspective to the focus of attention. The color rendition is simply stunning under low light .. and SHARP!

Shame it doesn't do 50P or 60P at 1920 !

...one day ....