Photography / Buying Guide

Mirrorless Cameras: A Buying Guide

Mirrorless cameras have been on the market for a decade, but they have really begun to make waves in the past few years. Most serious photographers would have certainly been shooting with a DSLR camera just a few years ago, but now many have traded in their DSLRs for the smaller and lighter form factors that mirrorless cameras provide. Not only are mirrorless cameras usually lighter and smaller than their DSLR counterparts, but they’re quieter, as well. With no mirror to slap up and down, street photographers, as well as wedding and theater photographers can now shoot virtually unnoticed.

Choosing a mirrorless camera can be a daunting task with lots of options, from sensor size, to video capabilities, to lens systems, and more. We will cover them all, and give you the information you need. Buying your new camera should be an exciting experience, so let this guide help you make an informed decision.

Lens Systems      

What differentiates mirrorless cameras from other compact cameras is the fact that they have interchangeable lenses. This makes a world of difference, and if you’ve never had an interchangeable-lens camera, you will be quite surprised by how it will change your photography.

Compact point-and-shoot cameras have a built-in lens that typically gives you an optical zoom with a variable aperture and small sensor. What this means is that while you might have the ability to shoot both wide and telephoto zoom lengths, you don’t have as much control over selective focus or shallow-depth-of-field techniques. Selective focus, often accentuated by pronounced bokeh, is one of the first things that people notice about photos taken with larger sensor, interchangeable-lens cameras, because now you have the option to shoot with a long zoom lens with an f/2.8 aperture, or a prime portrait lens with an f/1.4 aperture.


Sample shots were taken with a GH4 and SLR Magic HyperPrime CINE 25mm T0.95 lens.

A good thing about mirrorless cameras is that because there is no mirror inside the camera in front of the sensor, their design allows for a very short focal flange distance, or the distance between the lens mount and the plane of the sensor. Because of this short distance, lenses that have a large focal flange length can be used on mirrorless cameras when you have a compatible adapter.  This means that, in addition to a wide selection of mirrorless-dedicated lenses, most SLR lenses can also fit onto your mirrorless camera as well.  This is important to know if you have a bunch of old lenses lying around or are making the switch from a DSLR to mirrorless; chances are there are adapters to fit your lenses to your new camera. Of course, you should always check compatibility before making any purchases.

While using older “legacy” lenses on a mirrorless camera is a great benefit, every pro has a con and, in most cases, the downside in this situation is that the adapters usually do not allow for autofocus capabilities, and sometimes do not transfer any electronic signals at all, so aperture must also be set manually. This can be a drawback for some photographers, but for videographers who normally change aperture and focus manually, this isn’t a drawback at all. 

Maybe you don’t have any lenses from other cameras, or you want to sell them all and forget about adapters. In that case, there is certainly no shortage of great lenses designed specifically for mirrorless cameras. Due to increasing attention to mirrorless systems, manufacturers have invested a great deal into providing a wide variety of lenses, from fast prime lenses to wide-to-tele zoom lenses. Whatever you are looking for in a lens, chances are you can find it in a mirrorless line.

Sensor Size

Different mirrorless cameras come with various-sized sensors, and this is where things can get a little confusing. To make things simple, think of a full-frame DSLR camera as having the largest sized sensor, and a point-and-shoot as the smallest sized sensor. Most mirrorless cameras fall somewhere in the middle, packing an APS-C sensor, which is common in consumer DSLR cameras, or a Micro Four Thirds sensor, which falls between an APS-C sensor and a point-and-shoot. While they are the minority, there are now a few cameras that do have a full-frame sensor, and there will probably be more to come in the future.

Micro Four Thirds cameras feature a 17.3 x 13mm sensor, and are most commonly made by Panasonic and Olympus. Both manufacturers use the same mount, as part of the Micro Four Thirds standard, so lenses are interchangeable between brands. Olympus usually utilizes in-camera stabilization, while Panasonic tends to have their stabilization in the lenses. However, Panasonic has recently begun to utilize in-body image stabilization in some models, as well.

A little bit smaller than the Micro Four Thirds sensors are the Nikon 1 (CX format) and Pentax Q series cameras, which use sensors closer to the size of point-and-shoot cameras—1" for the Nikon 1, 1/1.7" or 1/2.3" for Pentax Q—allowing these lines to be much more compact than other mirrorless cameras.  

A significant reason that some people like mirrorless cameras is that they are smaller and lighter than DSLRs, and a lot of that has to do with the smaller sensor size. While a smaller and lighter camera is great for some, it, too, has a drawback. Generally speaking, larger sensors perform better in lower light, and produce less image noise in photos taken with higher ISO sensitivities. If low-light photography is important to you, you might want to consider one of the full-frame mirrorless cameras, or at least one with an APS-C sized sensor. If you are more concerned with a smaller camera size, and don’t require the best in low-light performance, a Micro Four Thirds camera might be a good fit for you. This is not to say that cameras with smaller sensors are not suitable for low-light shooting, rather, it is one of the main benefits of a larger sensor size.

Sample shots were taken with a GH4 and SLR Magic HyperPrime CINE 25mm T0.95 lens.


Viewfinders are another thing to take into consideration, particularly if you’re switching from a DSLR or other type of camera that has an optical TTL (through-the-lens) viewfinder. A TTL viewfinder means that what you are seeing is exactly (or very close to) what the lens is seeing. Since, by design, there is no mirror to direct the view of the lens to the viewfinder, many mirrorless cameras utilize an electronic viewfinder, or EVF.

There are, of course, benefits and disadvantages to the EVF, just as there are for an optical viewfinder. One thing that can be distracting is that touch of lag time between the moment that something is actually moving and the time that you see it in the EVF. As technology improves, this lag time is becoming shorter and shorter and, in some cameras, is already imperceptible.

Another disadvantage is that an EVF eats away at your battery power, just as using your LCD screen would. This is minimal, and usually not a huge concern, but just another thing to take into consideration.

As for advantages, there are quite a few, the first of which is focus peaking, which has become a desirable asset when comparing cameras for video or manual-focus uses. Focus peaking is a real-time focusing aid that highlights edges of contrast within the frame with a colored line, which helps to avail a more objective system of determining critical sharpness when focusing manually.

Focus Peaking

The other main advantage an EVF has is its ability to give an accurate depiction of any exposure, color balance, or other camera-setting adjustments prior to shooting. Whereas an OVF simply displays the subject as it is, an EVF gives you a closer representation of the final image.


DSLR cameras use what is called phase detection to focus on a subject, while mirrorless cameras use contrast detection. Phase detection takes advantage of the mirror in a DSLR camera to divide the incoming light into pairs of images, compares them, and then quickly focuses the lens on the subject.

Mirrorless cameras, on the other hand, use contrast detection to measure the contrast between pixels on the sensor until it detects enough contrast to find that the image is in focus. The downside of this focusing method is that it is slower, and more difficult to use in low light. It is also less effective when trying to focus on moving objects.

The good news for mirrorless shooters is that many newer cameras are now using a hybrid focusing method that combines phase- and contrast-detection methods. This is another consideration to weigh before choosing your camera. If fast autofocus, especially in low light, is important to you, you should consider a camera with a hybrid autofocus system.


Video recording is one area where mirrorless cameras and DSLR cameras are pretty much neck and neck, when it comes to quality. Of course, mirrorless cameras are going to offer video shooters more flexibility with lenses than DSLR cameras, but both systems offer cameras that can shoot full HD, and some cameras can also now shoot 4K.

Get the most out of 4K video recording by connecting your mirrorless camera to a 4K recorder/monitor.

"If you’re making the move up from point-and-shoot cameras to a mirrorless, then the video quality is going to be leaps and bounds better than what you’re used to."

What mirrorless cameras improve upon, compared to many DSLRs, is the way they shoot, not necessarily what they can shoot. Because mirrorless cameras focus with continuous contrast-detection, you can more easily focus, and maintain focus, on moving subjects in your frame. DSLRs also utilize contrast-detection focusing when recording movies, or when working in live view, but since it is the inherent technology within a mirrorless camera, it is often more refined and responsive.

If you’re making the move up from point-and-shoot cameras to a mirrorless, then the video quality is going to be leaps and bounds better than what you’re used to. For one thing, you will be able to control the depth of field via the aperture, and also manually focus your shot. This gives you greater creative control, not to mention much higher-quality files.

The smaller size of mirrorless cameras means that the camera’s light weight allows for longer shooting with less fatigue than shooting video handheld with a DSLR camera.

If you are a serious videographer and want professional video capabilities, you might consider a mirrorless camera that records video in a high-quality format, such as AVCHD or XAVC S, and one with which you can use external microphones, headphones, video monitors, and recorders.

Wireless Functionality

The wireless capabilities that have been included in many of the mirrorless cameras on the market are truly incredible. Most cameras with Wi-Fi also have a partner app for either iOS or Android that allow you to control the camera from a smartphone or tablet.

NFC allows cameras to “bump” each other, or another smart device, to share photos.

These apps range from basic live view and shutter control, to full control over shutter speed, aperture, ISO, and other settings that you would normally need to adjust on the camera.

Some cameras enable you to transfer images directly to a smart device from your camera, or even right to your favorite social media sites. Another great Wi-Fi function is Near Field Communication, or NFC, which allows cameras to tap-to-connect with one another or a smart device, to share photos. This is especially helpful when you’re with friends and you want to share photos without having to remember to email them later.

Choosing Your Mirrorless Camera

By now you should be able to make an informed decision about buying your next camera. Keep in mind the main points we discussed. If image size and quality, especially in low light, is important to you, choose a camera with either an APS-C or full-frame sensor. However, if you’re looking for a compact camera that offers more control and options than a point-and-shoot, choose one of the cameras with a smaller sensor.

Most mirrorless cameras will fall into one of three categories: consumer, prosumer, and professional. This doesn’t mean that a professional camera will guarantee professional-looking photos, rather, that it is built with the capabilities that professionals need and want.


Entry-level consumer mirrorless cameras are a great starting point for someone looking to make a move from point-and-shoot cameras to something with a little more flexibility and control. Often, entry-level mirrorless cameras are a replacement for consumers who are using an entry-level DSLR and like the interchangeable-lens feature, but want something that is lighter and smaller. These cameras usually offer an LCD to compose your photos instead of an electronic viewfinder. Consumer-level mirrorless cameras typically have a smaller sensor, allowing for a smaller and lighter body size, while sacrificing a little bit of image quality.


In between consumer and pro cameras are “prosumer” cameras. In the world of mirrorless cameras, prosumer-level cameras will probably be most comfortable for photographers making the move from a DSLR to a mirrorless model. Prosumer cameras have a slightly smaller body size than professional-level cameras, while offering more control and better image quality than consumer cameras.

Another thing that makes prosumer mirrorless cameras appealing is that many of them have an electronic viewfinder, as well as the LCD screen on the back of the camera. This makes the transition to mirrorless much easier if you are accustomed to looking through an optical viewfinder. With both an EVF and an LCD screen, problems with viewing your composition in bright light are minimized.

Professional-Level Cameras

If the highest-quality video and imagery is what you seek from a mirrorless camera, a professional-level camera will deliver what you need. These cameras straddle all formats, including Micro Four Thirds, APS-C, and full-frame and also tend to feature larger, more durable bodies that are often weather sealed. Additionally, they are characterized by faster processors, which aid autofocus performance and buffering when shooting large files or burst sequences. These cameras are also ideal for shooting professional videos, thanks to their support for external monitors, headphones, and microphones, as well as external video recorders.

These are the cameras that you will want to consider if you are an advanced hobbyist or professional who is used to the feel and performance of a professional DSLR camera. They offer the most creative control through their inclusion of fully manual adjustment capabilities and support for interface customization. Additionally, professional-grade cameras are usually the preferred choice when working in adverse situations, such as extreme low lighting or fast-action situations, due to their expanded imaging capabilities, sensitivity, and refined focusing performance.

After you choose your preferred sensor size or system type, think about what kind of lenses you might already own, or what types of lenses exist for the various cameras you are considering. Some manufacturers have a wider line of lenses for their mirrorless cameras than others, and this might be important to you if you like options.

Key Features to Consider:

Sensor size
Form factor
Lens mount
Video capabilities
Hot shoe
Battery grip

Once you have narrowed down the larger, important aspects of choosing your camera, take a look at what features are important to you. Do you need HD or 4K video? Maybe you are a social-media guru and really like the ability to share photos online directly from your camera.

Another consideration is the accessories that are available for the various cameras. If you use an external flash, you’re going to want to make sure compatible flashes are available, and that the camera has a hot shoe to which one can be attached. Other accessories that might be important are battery grips, cases, remote controls, and apps―just to name a few.

You should now be prepared to choose the mirrorless camera that best suits your needs. Of course, if you have any questions, feel free to stop by the B&H SuperStore in New York, speak with a sales professional on the telephone at 1-800-606-6969 or contact us online for a Live Chat.

Items discussed in article

Discussion 46

Add new comment

Add comment Cancel

Not a bad article in general, and reasonably tailored to the target audience.  With one exception, I would not take issue with your specifics, but your mention that contrast-detect AF in mirrorless cameras is "slower" and less easy to use in low light is misleading for those less familiar.  Have you used an up-to-date mirrorless camera lately?  They are not slow, far from it, they are often described as "lightning-fast", and whilst in extremis low light might show some fallibility, the other side of the coin is that an EVF will "gain up" in low light - often to the benefit of the inexperienced user who can see what is not possible with an optical finder.   The sad fact is that we are always comparing mirrorless with the SLR - whose technology is years out of date - because the SLR is the incumbent dominant species.  Mirrorless technology is actually the purer: if electronics had come first, no-one in their right mind would think of putting a mechanical mirror box in the way of the optics.  Given another few years, we shall see less and less of the SLR because its essential technology can go no further, whereas electronics is taking photography (and other things!) forward.

Do you have a mirrorless camera that you recommend? I keep getting pulled in different directions between articles claiming Sony (A7II or A5100 or A6000) is the best with articles favoring Samsung (such as the NX1) and articles favoring FujiFilm (like the X-T1 or X-T10). I don't know which one to go with! Any guidance would be greatly appreciated!

Can you advise me how to detach the ring on the Leica D-Lux 6 lens housing in order to mount an adapter for, e.g. use of a circular polarizer?


Leica does not support using a filter on the camera. I've read many posts on line where users were able to remove the ring and use a generic adapter made for Panasonic LX7 while others found ring not removeable. If unattaching is possible, the ring around the base of the lens should easily unscrew. Leica may have done something to prevent removal of the ring but I have no way to confirm one way or the other.

As an old hobby photographer I found this article very enlightening and has helped me make up my mind to change to a small mirror less camera. I think I will stick with Olympus though as my 50 year Olympus OM1 still takes very good chemical pictures.

Great article for my grand daughter to consider.thanks.

As an old user of LEICA film cameras (M3 and on), I am surprised that no mention is done to the more important fact in casual portrait and journalism kind of photos, and that is speed of response.

On single lens reflect cameras (mirror), I used to miss shots because of the delay. Unless response speed has improved that much and I am not aware. 

Now that there seem to be good mirrorless cameras, I will most certainly get one.

Alain Rosenberg

As an old user of LEICA film cameras (M3 and on), I am surprised that no mention is done to the more important fact in casual portrait and journalism kind of photos, and that is speed of response.

On single lens reflect cameras (mirror), I used to miss shots because of the delay. Unless response speed has improved that much and I am not aware. 

Now that there seem to be good mirrorless cameras, I will most certainly get one.

Alain Rosenberg

I'm in the process of buying a mirrorless camera. I could use a little guidance and will be making the eventual purchase through your site. Background & criteria: I currently own a Nikon D5000. I am not well versed or skilled with it. I do not know much about photography, however I both want and need to learn. I do not have a lot of investment in Nikon lenses, however, my father-in-law does. In other words, it does not have to be a Nikon, but I have been looking at them. The reason for the purchase is that I am a motorcycle rider, traveler, writer. My D5000 is too large to pack in my gear. I will be taking a lot of outdoor photos. Possibly action photos. I have been given the opportunity to write for a magazine and they are going to need photos to accompany the travel/bike stories. I have read many reviews from many sources, but I just don't know enough about cameras to make a wise choice.I would like to spend about $1,000 or so for the camera and at least one lens. I would like to have a viewfinder as well, which narrows the choice. I don't like usuing the screen nearly as much, unless I have my helmet on. I have been looking at the Nikon 1 V2 that you have paired with 2 lenses, but will consider any brand. Any guidance will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

My apologies: I was half asleep when I posted this and did not realize I was posting in a feedback forum to the article. Disregard.

Hello Jamie,

No need to appologize, we more then happy to help anyway we can.

The Nikon V2 is a very good camera offering 4.2MP 13.2 x 8.8mm CMOS CX Image Sensor, Electronic Viewfinder, Wi-Fi Capability and advanced phase detection autofocus. The down side is the cameras imaging sensor is significantly smaller than your D5000’s and the Nikon 1 lens mount is not interchange with your existing Nikon “F” mount lenses. For size consideration, using the FT1 Mount Adapter will give you a package similar in size and bulk to your current DSLR. 

The Sony A6000 has an imaging sensor similar in size to your Nikon but is the size of the V2. The A6000 features: 24.3MP APS-C-sized Exmor APS HD CMOS sensor & BIONZ X image processor, detailed electronic viewfinder, built-in Wi-Fi connectivity and Fast Hybrid AF system utilizes both a 179-point phase-detection system and 25-point contrast-detection system to achieve precise focus in as little as 0.06 sec.

The included 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Retractable Zoom Lens provides a 35mm-equivalent focal length range of 24-75mm, features Optical SteadyShot image stabilization to help minimize the appearance of camera shake, 1 extra-low dispersion element and four aspherical elements are integrated into the optical construction to help reduce chromatic aberrations as well as increase clarity, sharpness & contrast plus the Power Zoom electronically-driven zoom mechanism brings greater efficiency to controlling the zoom position of the lens. When in the off position, the lens collapses to a tiny 1.2" (30mm) which can fit easily into a small pouch or large pocket.

A question about the a6000 which looks like a great camera. Would it also be great for filming video? My main focus will be short and feature length videos and documentaries. I have watched an enormous amount of reviews but the still camera portion is usually the main focus. I had to return my 6D because of the moire issue. I basically want filmic look, not digital mish mash. 

Yes it would be.  The camera packs quite a powerful punch considering its size and cost.  It has proven to be a very popular camera for those wanting to have a compact/portable video camera option as well as those starting off in the video world.  Its relatively easy to learn and has great image quality.  If you're still on the fence about purchasing, you could always consider renting a unit for a weekend to give it a test drive.  We don't offer rentals ourselves but there are many good rental houses featured online. 

I am looking for a guide book for operating the Sony Apha 7R which I recently purchased. I use the 7R with an adaptor for various Leica m lens: 21mm, 35mm & 90mm. It was the 21mm which made me go from 4/3 to a full frame becausewith the 4/3, my 21mm was essentially a 32mm, which cannot do justice to exteriors of building shoots so that utility wires, & poles do not mess up the pix.

The only negatives are that the 7R (1) has a loud shutter, which I have not been able to silence, or at least quiet down, and (2) I cannot figure how to do the electronic magnification when doing critical focusing. Other than that, it is really powerful, and has a quite fast button to shutter response time.

This is only my 2nd digital camera-my 1st was the NikonP7100 which I enjoyed because it had a rotating view screen and an electric viewfinder which did coordinate with the lens changing focal length. but, its color renditions were not to my liking and i wanted a little bit more resolution for enlargements. My film camera is a Leica m-3.

Is there a guidebook similar to the one written for the NEX7, which a friend of mine has?

Thank you!

Dave Tarditi

Currently we have only one guidebook on the A7/A7r cameras to offer you.  See the link below for details:

thanks very much, going to purchase Fujifilm X-T1 soon.

suffered great confusion, now i know what questions to ask.

Send info on 4/3rds digital cameras

DSLR FOREVER !   I, for one, am NOT going to show up at a wedding with a pukey little camera (image quality notwithstanding) that is harder to hold and needs dedicated lenses !  To me, the "cons" are far greater than the "pros" of a mirrorless.  Canon only offers a token consumer-level mirrorless and, with their continuing refinement of DSLRs, that's good enough for me.  Even Nikon doesn't offer anything of significance in that arena.  Ask yourself:  what do they know that nobody else does ?

Jim,  No one cares what you don't like...

Very helpful article, thank you. I have only ever owned point and shoot cameras, but recently barrowed a Nikon D90 and really like the photograph quality and the results I get with the manual focus, but the weight is just unbearable.

This article would be even better if for each category it mentions it had a link to the cameras that fall under it. For example the filters in the store do not have the consumer, prosumer and professional categories or the focus type. 

I am looking for a mirrorless camer that will let me shoot both great travel photos, and also great product shots of my ceramic art. it needs to have a good zoom and also macro lens. I can get these separately if that makes sense. A friend has recommended the Olympus OMD EM 5 with 12mm - 50mm lens. She says it has built in macro capability. Would that work?

The Olympus OM-D E-M5 camera with the 12-50mm lens is a great camera choice for your work, and the lens would be suitable for the majority of your shots.  While the lens is not a macro lens, it still has a nice close minimum focus  distance and depending on the size of your ceramics may do the trick on its own.  For smaller pieces of art, I would recommend their 60mm macro lens which will give you great reproduction value of small details and small items.  See the two links below for the camera packaged with the 12-50mm lens, and the 60mm macro for you to consider also:

Thanks for the article. I'm new to all of this and it's helpful and well presented. Question: I have really liked what I've seen about the A6000, but then I discovered it doesn't have a mic jack. One of the many things I want to be able to do with my camera is record good quality videos using an external mic and/or my Zoom H5. I am trying to avoid having to sync in post as much as possible. You mentioned looking for cameras with an external mic for people interested in video. Do you have a few recommendations I can go research? So bummed that the A6000 doesn't have one. Hoping to find something else I can get excited about around that price range. Thanks!

A6000 has a microphone

Which model do you feel would work best in an underwater setting?  I have a strobe that I would use with it. 

Not every strobe is compatible with every camera.  If you would like to use your strobe that you have, we would need to know which specific make and model it is.  Please send us an email to our Underwater specialsts at and indicate the model of your strobe, and they can reply back with any recommended model of mirrorless cameras which could be used with it.  Thank you in advance.

Great and very helpful article. I am in the process of buying my first real camera and will shoot a feature with it - crazy I know! I have been researching cameras online and actually bought one. I spent a couple grand and tested it for a week and realized: 1. I was so green I didn't really know what I was doing, although I studied it hard, and 2. that to get what I needed on the 6D I must use a software hack which would void the warranty. What!? So I took it back and am glad that I did. So now more research - this is quite helpful. I think I have watched every tutorial on youtube - also helpful, but I am starting to agree with John Hopkinson (first comment) that the SLR technology, though wonderful, may be out of date. But I will peruse all the other comments as well. Thanks, BH!

Hi, I have a Canon EOS Digital Rebel which I bought about 15 years ago. I have several lenses including a pretty lightweight 50mm lens. I'm looking to see if I should get a new camera or lenses at this time. I'm very happy with the photos I get but I am looking for something lighter weight that doesn't compromise on photo quality. I don't necessarily need all the bells and whistles in my Rebel, but I do appreciate good photos and am willing to take some effort... I find I usually end up taking pix with my iPhone because I don't want to lug my camera with me. Would you recommend the newer Rebel body for me which I can use with my existing lenses? Or a mirror less like the Sony alpha 6000? Or the canon power shot g7x? Would love some advice. 

In this instance I would recommend the Canon EOS Rebel Sl1 camera, which is Canon’s smallest/lightest weight DSLR, and it happens to be pretty powerful.  It would definitely be an upgrade to an older Rebel such as you have and would still be compatible with the lenses you have. 

The Sony A6000 is also a great camera, but if you’re more looking to depart from the issue of “not wanting to lug a camera around with you” I would recommend something more along the lines of the G7x or other similar models.  The Fuji X30 is a great model, as is the Panasonic LX100.  Of the 3 models the G7x is the most compact.  See the links below for details on the two other recommended models as well as the Canon EOS Rebel SL1 camera.

Hi, I'm looking to buy a mirrorless camera. I currently own a Nikon D90 with an 18-250mm Tamron lens. I have narrowed it down to the A6000 and the Lumix DX7 and was wondering about your opinion of the two cameras? I like the M4/3 nature of the DX7 as it makes it a lot more compatible with lenses, unlike the E-mount A6000, however I also like the fast-focusing claims of the A6000. I am currently leaning towards the GX7 and wondered what you thought of it?

Both cameras have great image quality and overall performance in most categories.  I personally would go for the A6000 as it does have remarkably fast autofocus, and it’s accurate and consistent and does very well with moving subject matter also.  If lens options for the A6000 are a concern, it’s worth noting there are a great amount of lenses available for the Sony E mount, (both the APS-C and full-frame options), plus if you take into account the amount of adapters offered for the system, you can adapt many other types of lenses (with some limitations in many cases) to the camera.  I would recommend mapping out what type of lens options you would want to explore with the purchase of a new camera, and see if the Sony system does not have the types you’re looking for.  If you have questions about a particular lens type, feel free to ask us and we can confirm if an option exists for it.  But between the two models in this instance, the A6000 would be my choice.

I'm in the process of purchasing a mirrorless camera for documenting my artwork and for traveling.
Ideally, I want it to be lightweight, under $1,000, large enough sensor to capture artwork details and colors (small to largescale paintings and drawings), 50-55 mm lens available/included, something I can continue to use for years to come and with a nice design that's not too complicated to use.
Do you have any suggestions on what's available now or coming out soon, that will work for me?
Thank you so much!

Below are links to three recommended mirrorless cameras which meet your criteria and your budget.


Great article!! And great comments!!

I'm looking into the Sony Alpha NEX-6/7 cameras. I find that they answer my requirements, and provide good bang for $$$.
Which other similar (in specs, price, form factor, etc...) cameras can you suggest that I can compare these with?

Thanks in advance,


So does this mean if I have a Sigma wide angle lens for my Pentax DSLR I can use my current lens with most mirrorless cameras? What mirrorless camera would you suggest for a price under $1,100.?

Pentax K-mount lenses can be adapted to the majority of mirrorless camera mounts available today.  The main/most popular mounts including Micro 4/3rds, Fuji X, Sony A (Alpha mount), Sony E (both APS-C and Full-frame versions) to name a few.  The prices of the adapters can however vary depending on the brand make of the adapter, and the specific camera system you’re trying to adapt the lens to. In some cases the cost of the adapter may cost as much as a new lens or close there to.  Below is a link to a list of all the current adapters to mount Pentax K-mount lenses to the various camera options for you to regard on our site.  Following that will be links to a few recommended mirrorless camera options for you to regard also.  If you would like further assistance with camera selection or mount selection, we ask that you contact us via email at, and our agents there can further assist you.

Very informative article. Thank you!  I am looking at the Sony A6000, but am hesitant for two reasons. First, it doesn't have the external microphone capability, which is necessary if making videos and having quality sound in them. Second, there seems to be a limit on the lens lengths. I suppose I am used to the 300mm telephoto lens' with the old SLR's. Capturing wildlife in the forest canopy as well as from afar in full daylight is a must and as of now, I don't feel confident that the lenses available will be up to par. I would like to know if there is more information on this that would change my perception?

Great article, it helped me so much in deciding between DSLR and Mirrorless. 

In the end I opted for Mirrorless, just seems so much more sensible for travel and to get away from the Canon Nikon designs and market stranglehold.

Final choice was a Fuji X-E2. Reasons being; the sensor, lens quality, build quality and the image quality.



I've been looking to upgrade to a new camera with interchangeable lens for years.  I'm not really interested the Bulky & Big DSLR's.  I do a lot of hiking and backpacking and I currently use the Cannon SX series due to the unimaginable optical zoom as well as a few other features like 20mp.  The downside to the SX, is that I find myself going through a camera a year due to lens failure issues and I want more control over my pictures.  More the latter.  Can I get a few Recomendations that I can do some research on...?  Money is not an issue and I do want to blow up my pictures for more poster sized prints.  I'm at that point where my lens failed on my older SX on a recent trip to Yellowstone and I'm looking hard for my old baby's replacement.  Best...!   Will

I"m currently using the Cannon SX410.  I like how quickly the camera turns on to complete the picture.  This is a very important feature for me and I want to retain this when upgrading to an interchangeable lens camera.

The first thing I would point out in upgrading from a super-zoom bridge camera to an interchangeable lens camera is that in getting a larger format camera, you’re going to have to sacrifice the unimaginable zoom range but I have a feeling you’re likely aware of that.  My recommendations will include lenses with as much zoom as possible without the cameras being huge like a DSLR would be.

See the following recommendations below that should suit your criteria:

And this is a broad tele-zoom option for it:

And also this camera:

with this broad tele-zoom option:

Nice article! Well, I'm considering exchanging all my Canon system to a mirrorless one, prior to my back aches in my trips. I bought two years ago in B&H a Canon 6D w/ 24-105mm L and 50mm 1.4 lenses. As I started research about the fuji X100t as a complementary camera, I discovered the mirrorless world. Maintaining the canon gear it's impossible, I would use it to fund the exchage. 

The benefits of a FF camera are really nice, so I have these models in sight:

- Sony Alpha A7 ii

- Fuji X-T1 

- Olympus OMD EM-5 Mark ii

In the video area how do they compare with the Canon?

I'm an advanced hobbyist and maybe you can help me to choose whether to maintain the Canon gear PLUS the X100T or exchange everything to one of these models. 

I appreciate!


Netto Pavezi

Of the three brands and models you’ve selected, I would say the Sony A7ii is the best when it comes to video.  All the brands have options for lens adapters to use lenses from other Cameras, however Sony has the most currently. 

For stills however the Fuji is my favorite. I abandoned my DSLR kit several years ago and I personally shoot with the original X100, and I love the camera. Traveling with it is a pleasure. Fuji’s colors and monochrome options are awesome (I used to shoot Fujifilm a lot and they have the color schemes for many of their films programmed into the camera as an option to work with).  The lens is sharp and has wonderful contrast and depth of field.  The X-T1 has the same type of quality and has some really wonderful native lens options available for it.  Fuji has a true charm about them, and many who shoot with the X100 were previous Leica M shooters and love the similar feel. 

In situations like this, I commonly recommend considering renting the camera/cameras prior to purchasing just to make sure you like not only the image results but the interface of the camera and how it handles. 

Hi guys.  Great article for a relative newbie such as myself.  I'm researching what to buy to use for video, (with all the usual bells and whistles - WiFi, full HD video and 4K.)  The Sony A6000 looks good on paper, but my worry is more to do with audio.  I'm surprised that it doesn't have a mic port.  With all the good things going for it, surely Sony would have this. Is the video recording format compatible with Final Cut Pro X? As you can see, I'm at that "vertical learning curve" stage of asking heaps of questions and trying to decypher all the tech talkback I get.  Fun, but please go easy.  My brain fills up pretty quickly!!

The lack of a mic-input port on the Sony A6000 is one of the few disadvantages of the camera. In situations where you want to use a special type of mic or any external mic for that matter, would require an external audio recording device and sync it with the video later in post.  In general this type of capture would be better than an on-board mic as you would be able to better isolate your subject’s audio and not run the risk of getting any camera noise captured at the same time. 

The camera records video in MP4, MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 formats which are compatible with Final Cut Pro X software.   

Great article for first time buyers--a lot of good information packed into a concise article. The only thing I noticed is that the crop factors of 1/2.3" and 1/1.7" are reversed.