REVIEW SNAPSHOT®

by PowerReviews
Sigma120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon
 
4.2

(based on 15 reviews)

Ratings Distribution

  • 5 Stars

     

    (7)

  • 4 Stars

     

    (6)

  • 3 Stars

     

    (1)

  • 2 Stars

     

    (0)

  • 1 Stars

     

    (1)

91%

of respondents would recommend this to a friend.

Pros

  • Fast / accurate auto-focus (9)
  • Durable (7)
  • Strong construction (7)
  • Rugged (5)
  • Nice bokeh (4)

Cons

  • Heavy (8)

Best Uses

  • Sports/action (11)
  • Wildlife photos (5)
    • Reviewer Profile:
    • Photo enthusiast (4), Pro photographer (4)
    • Was this a gift?:
    • No (12)

Most Liked Positive Review

 

Sigma hits a home run

I previously wrote a very positive review of the older OS version of this lens, which I ended up selling in order to purchase this new "Sport" version. Boy...Read complete review

I previously wrote a very positive review of the older OS version of this lens, which I ended up selling in order to purchase this new "Sport" version. Boy am I glad I did.To start with, the finish and feel of the lens is fantastic. The focus and zoom rings are smooth with just the right amount of resistance. The newly designed lens hood is of much higher quality than the older plastic one, and uses both a bayonet and locking screw mechanism to attach. It also has a very nice rubberized ring on the front of the hood to absorb minor bumps. The tripod collar turns relatively smoothly and is removable (I find a small amount of silicone spray on a cloth, then wiped on the inside of the collar helps make it turn smoother). One thing I miss though is that the older tripod collar had a beveled bottom that bolted directly onto any Arca Swiss style tripod head. Unfortunately this new one is cut square, and I will be enlisting a machinist friend of mine to bevel cut the new collar for me at some point so it works like the older one.I have read online that optically this new version is the same as its predecessor, but I find it to be better overall (perhaps newer coatings?). This is especially the case wide open, and with the Canon 1.4x and 2x model II converters. Comparing images made with the Canon 300 2.8 IS I can see more of an obvious difference with the older 120-300 over the new one. The Sport lens still is not as sharp as the Canon, but it's still REALLY sharp, all the way through the zoom range (I mentioned in my other review the Canon 300 2.8 IS is the sharpest lens I've ever used). Performance of the 120-300 Sport with the Canon 1.4x II is so good in fact, that unless I need the 2.8 aperture or 120 range the converter is pretty much permanently attached (so if you don't have the $$$$$ for the new Canon 200-400 this is a REALLY GOOD alternative in my book). You do lose some optical quality with the converters, but the performance is on par with the Canon lens + Canon converter in my opinion. Vignetting wide open is minimal, and pretty much gone by f5.6. Chromatic aberration and distortion are also almost nonexistent.This new version is said to have weather sealing for use in extreme environments. On the first day I used the new lens it actually rained, so I took the chance and left the rain cover off just to test it. It was not a soaking rain, but it did get pretty wet and so far so good.It took about three weeks after the lens became available for Sigma to release the USB dock. For the price it is worth every penny, and for one reason alone. The lens has two custom presets that you can program with different options like setting the range of the focus limiter, or the autofocus speed. The latter is what you want the dock for. Setting the lens for what the software calls "Motor's drive speed priority" actually makes the autofocus faster! So fast that it is hard to tell the difference between the Canon 300 2.8 IS and the Sigma. Not only is it fast but it is also incredibly accurate at that setting. It makes me wonder why Sigma would make the default setting slower in the first place. It also makes me wonder why, for the price of the lens, and the price of the dock, that the dock isn't included with the lens. The dock also lets you update the lens' firmware when a new version is released, and micro adjust the lens' focus (which I haven't played with since so far the adjustment control in the Canon bodies is sufficient enough).The lens ships with a standard black nylon case and straps similar to the old one, but I wish Sigma had updated the case and made it a little longer so you could fit a camera body attached inside. An outside pocket for holding teleconverters, the USB dock and other miscellaneous stuff would have been a nice touch too.One other thing I would mention is that, like the older version, at 300mm the Sigma doesn't magnify quite as much as the Canon 300 2.8 IS. If I had to guess it would be closer to 280mm than 300mm, but it's something I'm willing to put up with for the convenience of having the added zoom range.What else can I say other than this lens is definitely a keeper, and a truly first-class professional optic on par with others in Sigma's new "Global Vision" line. I'm not ready just yet to sell off the Canon 300 2.8 IS, but I can say that since getting the new Sigma the Canon lens has been living in its case.

VS

Most Liked Negative Review

 

Beautiful lens, but just not sharp.

I really wanted to love this lens with its 2.8 aperture, beautiful finish and fantastic zoom range. I thought it would be perfect with the new Canon 7Dmll. But, it just isn't...Read complete review

I really wanted to love this lens with its 2.8 aperture, beautiful finish and fantastic zoom range. I thought it would be perfect with the new Canon 7Dmll. But, it just isn't sharp. I tried two different copies, updated the lens firmware with the USB dock, and tried using the camera's micro adjustments. I just couldn't get it to sharpen. The problem was the same on both my Canon 7D and 5Dmlll. The camera microadjustment (-18) helped somewhat but just couldn't get it as sharp as my 300 f/4 or 300 f/2.8.

Reviewed by 15 customers

Sort by

Displaying reviews 1-15

Back to top

(0 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

 
3.0

Beautiful lens, but just not sharp.

By Brent

from Landing, nJ

Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

I really wanted to love this lens with its 2.8 aperture, beautiful finish and fantastic zoom range. I thought it would be perfect with the new Canon 7Dmll. But, it just isn't sharp. I tried two different copies, updated the lens firmware with the USB dock, and tried using the camera's micro adjustments. I just couldn't get it to sharpen. The problem was the same on both my Canon 7D and 5Dmlll. The camera microadjustment (-18) helped somewhat but just couldn't get it as sharp as my 300 f/4 or 300 f/2.8.

Share this review

(0 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

 
5.0

120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon

By Mr. Harrison

from Woodward, OK

About Me Casual Photographer

Verified Buyer

Pros

  • Fast / accurate auto-focus

Cons

  • Heavy

Best Uses

  • Sports/Action

Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

Great lens for the price

  • Was this a gift?:
  • No

Share this review

 
5.0

Great lens for the money

By Ironman71270

from Dallas, Tx

About Me Pro Photographer

Verified Buyer

Pros

  • Durable
  • Fast / accurate auto-focus
  • Rugged
  • Strong Construction

Cons

    Best Uses

    • Sports/Action

    Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

    Just got this lens and I'm trilled. I love how it handles and the sharpness is great.

    • Was this a gift?:
    • No

    Share this review

     
    4.0

    It's heavy

    By Kalihari

    from Walla Walla, WA

    About Me Pro Photographer

    Verified Buyer

    Pros

    • Durable
    • Fast / accurate auto-focus

    Cons

      Best Uses

      • Sports/Action
      • Wildlife Photos

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      It's heavy but you'd expect it to be. My only complaint is that I wish the rotation of the tripod collar was a bit smoother. It feels a bit clunky to me. Other than that a great lens.

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

       
      4.0

      So far I am glad I purchased this lens

      By Randy C

      from Spokane, WA

      About Me Semi-pro Photographer

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

      • Consistent Output
      • Durable
      • Easily Interchangeable
      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Rugged
      • Strong Construction

      Cons

      • Heavy

      Best Uses

      • Sports/Action

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      Used this for a college football game in daylight.Sat in the end zone and used a monopod because this lens is heavy and so far I love it. Pictures from as far as 100 yards away were awesome. It's a fast lens, kept about 90 percent of the pictures taken.Still need to try a night football game and some indoor volleyball soon and will leave a review once that is done.

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (3 of 3 customers found this review helpful)

       
      5.0

      A More Affordable Sports Lens

      By Dave Imagequestphoto

      from Zeeland, MI

      About Me Pro Photographer

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

      • Consistent Output
      • Durable
      • Flexible
      • Lightweight
      • Rugged
      • Strong Construction

      Cons

      • Slow Focus

      Best Uses

      • Indoors/Low Light
      • Night Photography
      • Sports/Action
      • Weddings/Events

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      I needed a fast lens beyond 200mm for sports action at night and indoors and the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 Sport fit my requirements better than the much more expensive options. I had rented this lens and others before making my decision and I found that I loved its versatility and that I could live with some of the areas where it is not quite as strong as its competition.

      The biggest complaint that I've read on this lens is its focusing speed as compared to the Canon 300mm. It does not focus as quickly as that lens, it is true, but the only time I find it is an issue is if you are making major changes in focus distance. For example if you quickly switch from focusing on the QB to a receiver downfield, you will notice the speed difference, but for most plays, if you are in the same neighborhood, changing focus from the QB to the running back, the difference is not all that important, the Sigma is plenty snappy.

      I find myself using this lens indoors more than my new Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, the extra zoom range is a welcome addition. The Sigma plays well with the Canon 1.4x Extender, but I've found it a little finicky with the 2.0x Extender, having a good microadjustment for the extender-lens combination makes a big difference.

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (1 of 8 customers found this review helpful)

       
      4.0

      I really wanted to like this lens, but..

      By Yukihyo

      from Tokyo, Japan

      About Me Photo Enthusiast

      Verified Reviewer

      Pros

      • Durable
      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Strong Construction

      Cons

      • Badly Balanced
      • Heavy
      • Not sharp wide open
      • Poor bokeh

      Best Uses

      • Sports/Action
      • Wildlife Photos

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      Admittedly, there is nothing to match this lens with its constant f/2.8 throughout the range. People are going to get hooked just by this feature alone, as only prime lenses are available at 300mm. BUT, this is NOT a 300mm lens! Tests show that it reaches only 280mm, the same magnification as a 70-200mm f/2.8 + a 1.4x teleconverter (although admittedly, this is f/4). Not good for starters. It is not sharp wide open, and the addition of a t/c (be it Canon in this case, or Sigma) only enhances the problem. It is a handsome, strongly built lens, and definitely a step up cosmetically from the previous model. But having had both, I feel that the optics are basically the same, so where is that substantial increase in weight coming from? I didn't like the tripod shoe from the outset, as it is set too far back, and the whole contraption feels unbalanced. I guess it is a little unfair to compare it too my Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II when running them side by side, but the resulting differences when comparing final results are just too overwhelming to dismiss. The Canon.....superb; the Sigma......fair to middlin'. I can't live with these results, and it's going in as a trade on a new Canon 300mm f/2.8 this coming week.

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

       
      5.0

      This is one awesome lens!

      By Vladimir Naumoff

      from Montreal, Canada

      About Me Semi-pro Photographer

      Verified Reviewer

      Pros

      • Consistent Output
      • Durable
      • Easily Interchangeable
      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Nice Bokeh
      • Rugged
      • Strong Construction

      Cons

      • Heavy

      Best Uses

      • Portraits
      • Sports/Action
      • Wildlife Photos

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      I have that lens almost for a month now. My previous lens was Nikon 300 mm F2.8 G VRII. What can I say… May be not as sharp as my predecessor and as fast but taking the fact that this is such versatile glass with such high standard of a build quality and zoom capability made me very happy. It works well with converters and as is on it's own. It has focus management capability which I haven't had a chance to use yet. I would buy this lens again. Great glass, great travel companion, saves a lot on buying other lenses and it's a such pleasure to hold it in your hands.Thanks Sigma

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (0 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

       
      5.0

      Already have 70-200, Now another toy.

      By ThisAMDude

      from North Babylon, NY

      About Me Photo Enthusiast

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

      • Easily Interchangeable
      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Nice Bokeh

      Cons

      • Heavy

      Best Uses

      • Landscape/Scenery
      • Sports/Action

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      I already have the Canon 70-200mm 2.8, but wasn't getting me that real closeup, so I bought this this with my 5D mark III. So much more. Its a bit heavy especially with the Mark III. But it seems solid.

      Share this review

      (2 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

       
      5.0

      lens delivers as advertised

      By Ray

      from Santa Cruz, CA

      About Me Photo Enthusiast

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Nice Bokeh

      Cons

      • Heavy

      Best Uses

      • Sports/Action
      • Wildlife Photos

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      I've had this lens for 2 weeks, using it for bird photography. I use it on a Canon 5D Mark III. As reported by the DXOMark score, this lens produces very sharp images. I'm very happy with the IQ. I did have to use the 5DMIII microadjust on the telephoto end. The lens was back focusing on my camera. I intend to get a monopod with tilt head because this lens is very heavy to use for more than an hour hand held. Very happy with the performance.

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (3 of 5 customers found this review helpful)

       
      4.0

      Sigma 120-300 Zoom

      By calleng

      from South Georgia USA

      About Me Pro Photographer

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

      • Strong Construction
      • Zoom

      Cons

      • Heavy

      Best Uses

      • Daylight Sports
      • Sports/Action

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      Lens is outstanding when used one stop down from wide open. There is a tremendous increase in sharpness and contrast going one stop down.I have mixed feelings about the lens, but am satisfied, since I use it primarily for college football during daylight. It is not as fast focusing as the Canon 300 f2.8 I that I have. Not nearly as sharp wide open, but has the zoom range to make it very useful. I have used it with the Canon III 1.4 extender and have been amazed at the results. At f5.6 (one stop down) It is really sharp at 300mm. Note: The loss of sharpness and contrast is not nearly as much when using less than 300mm (120-200).

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (1 of 1 customers found this review helpful)

       
      4.0

      Excellent lens

      By candc

      from Wautoma, WI

      About Me Photo Enthusiast

      Pros

      • Durable
      • Fast / accurate auto-focus
      • Nice Bokeh
      • Rugged
      • Sharp Everywhere
      • Strong Construction

      Cons

      • Heavy
      • Need Dock For Best Result

      Best Uses

      • Indoors/Low Light
      • Sports/Action
      • Wildlife Photos

      Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

      i have been using the lens for a couple days now. if you are interested in this lens you have to get the dock and will need to spend some time tuning it and then it is really, really good it is super sharp everywhere on the 70d especially wide open at 300 where it counts. the lens is internally zooming and focusing, it suffers from heavy focus breathing. it is 300 at infinity focus but only 230-240 or so at minimum focus. that's why lens testers point out its 280 at the distance they are testing at.

      you can set custom af speed, focus limit and is behavior with the dock. i have c1 set to fast af, limited the focus from 10m to infinity and set moderate is. using it like this and ai servo it has no problem focusing and tracking low flying geese in the fog as they pass overhead.

      i haven't used it with converters and i am not sure i will. its a really useful range on an aps-c body and there is plenty of room to crop with the 70d if you need to. the 70d is too small for the lens, your fingers pinch between the grip and the lens. it feels good on the 40d so i think it would be really good on the 7d and presumably the 7d2.

      you have to be willing to spend some time tuning and fiddling with this lens but then it will give you excellent results. it is heavy, sigma tank construction on this one, there does not appear to be any consideration for weight saving, its around 8 lbs with the collar and hood

      would be 5 stars if it did not need tuning out of the box

      • Was this a gift?:
      • No

      Share this review

      (8 of 48 customers found this review helpful)

       
      1.0

      uncorrectable back focusing

      By Daniel

      from Atlanta, GA

      Pros

        Cons

        • Blurry Focus

        Best Uses

          Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

          From 10m to infinity, this lens have severe back focusing problem. Even using max focus adjustment setting with Sigma USB Dock of -20, 300mm near 30m still back focus.

          Share this review

          (10 of 12 customers found this review helpful)

           
          4.0

          No other lens like it...

          By SoCal

          from Los Angeles, CA

          Verified Buyer

          Pros

            Cons

              Best Uses

                Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

                This lens has no equal, though that's because there are no other zoom lenses in this focal range with a fixed f/2.8 aperture. And because of the f/2.8, it is a heavy lens. Shooting handheld is possible, though I wouldn't recommend doing so for prolonged periods of time.

                There is some amount of CA when shooting wide open, but with the post-editting softwares available today, that's not a huge issue at all.

                I must confess, I was trying to "cheat" my way to 600mm. I was hoping that this lens would play nice with my Canon 2x III. It may just be with my copy of the lens, but the TC and the lens did not play well together. AI Servo was quite slow, unbearably slow. I knew that AF speed would take a hit using the TC but I didn't expect such a dramatic change along with poor tracking performance yielding relatively low accuracy rate (around 25% hit rate) of focused photos. (This using a 1DX.) However, static subjects at 600mm was acceptably sharp.

                Even without the TC, I would say the focus acquisition/speed is still a little slower than that of my Canon zooms (100-400, 70-200/2.8ii). Understandably, there are bigger elements to move around so I'm sure that factored into the AF speed.

                On my copy of the lens, the OS would "twitch/jitter" every second or two. It would occur at a consistent frequency, which is something I did not expect to see. It's not very noticeable (if at all) without the 2x converter on. But when attached and at 600mm, the image in the VF would skip slightly whenever the twitch/jitter occurred.

                I've heard/read that this lens will accept Sigma/Kenko TC's better, but I didn't go out of my way to find out.

                This is a good lens, overall, if you use it for its intended purposes. It's lack-luster performance with my Canon 2x iii is why I'm not giving it 5 stars, and why I no longer have the lens.

                Again, I attribute that to my own fault. As I noted earlier, I was hoping/thinking this would be the least expensive way for me to squeeze 600mm (and even possibly even 840mm/8 if I stacked another 1.4 on it). I was overly optimistic. I can't fault the lens for not doing what it wasn't designed specifically for.

                Share this review

                (28 of 32 customers found this review helpful)

                 
                5.0

                Sigma hits a home run

                By Jerseyshooter

                from Central NJ

                Pros

                • Only Lens In Its Class

                Cons

                • Heavy For A 300 28

                Best Uses

                • Sports Wildlife

                Comments about Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Lens for Canon:

                I previously wrote a very positive review of the older OS version of this lens, which I ended up selling in order to purchase this new "Sport" version. Boy am I glad I did.To start with, the finish and feel of the lens is fantastic. The focus and zoom rings are smooth with just the right amount of resistance. The newly designed lens hood is of much higher quality than the older plastic one, and uses both a bayonet and locking screw mechanism to attach. It also has a very nice rubberized ring on the front of the hood to absorb minor bumps. The tripod collar turns relatively smoothly and is removable (I find a small amount of silicone spray on a cloth, then wiped on the inside of the collar helps make it turn smoother). One thing I miss though is that the older tripod collar had a beveled bottom that bolted directly onto any Arca Swiss style tripod head. Unfortunately this new one is cut square, and I will be enlisting a machinist friend of mine to bevel cut the new collar for me at some point so it works like the older one.I have read online that optically this new version is the same as its predecessor, but I find it to be better overall (perhaps newer coatings?). This is especially the case wide open, and with the Canon 1.4x and 2x model II converters. Comparing images made with the Canon 300 2.8 IS I can see more of an obvious difference with the older 120-300 over the new one. The Sport lens still is not as sharp as the Canon, but it's still REALLY sharp, all the way through the zoom range (I mentioned in my other review the Canon 300 2.8 IS is the sharpest lens I've ever used). Performance of the 120-300 Sport with the Canon 1.4x II is so good in fact, that unless I need the 2.8 aperture or 120 range the converter is pretty much permanently attached (so if you don't have the $$$$$ for the new Canon 200-400 this is a REALLY GOOD alternative in my book). You do lose some optical quality with the converters, but the performance is on par with the Canon lens + Canon converter in my opinion. Vignetting wide open is minimal, and pretty much gone by f5.6. Chromatic aberration and distortion are also almost nonexistent.This new version is said to have weather sealing for use in extreme environments. On the first day I used the new lens it actually rained, so I took the chance and left the rain cover off just to test it. It was not a soaking rain, but it did get pretty wet and so far so good.It took about three weeks after the lens became available for Sigma to release the USB dock. For the price it is worth every penny, and for one reason alone. The lens has two custom presets that you can program with different options like setting the range of the focus limiter, or the autofocus speed. The latter is what you want the dock for. Setting the lens for what the software calls "Motor's drive speed priority" actually makes the autofocus faster! So fast that it is hard to tell the difference between the Canon 300 2.8 IS and the Sigma. Not only is it fast but it is also incredibly accurate at that setting. It makes me wonder why Sigma would make the default setting slower in the first place. It also makes me wonder why, for the price of the lens, and the price of the dock, that the dock isn't included with the lens. The dock also lets you update the lens' firmware when a new version is released, and micro adjust the lens' focus (which I haven't played with since so far the adjustment control in the Canon bodies is sufficient enough).The lens ships with a standard black nylon case and straps similar to the old one, but I wish Sigma had updated the case and made it a little longer so you could fit a camera body attached inside. An outside pocket for holding teleconverters, the USB dock and other miscellaneous stuff would have been a nice touch too.One other thing I would mention is that, like the older version, at 300mm the Sigma doesn't magnify quite as much as the Canon 300 2.8 IS. If I had to guess it would be closer to 280mm than 300mm, but it's something I'm willing to put up with for the convenience of having the added zoom range.What else can I say other than this lens is definitely a keeper, and a truly first-class professional optic on par with others in Sigma's new "Global Vision" line. I'm not ready just yet to sell off the Canon 300 2.8 IS, but I can say that since getting the new Sigma the Canon lens has been living in its case.

                • Was this a gift?:
                • No

                Share this review