The 3.5" to 5.25" Front Bay Bracket Adapter from StarTech is a plastic, drive adapter bracket that lets you install a 3.5" drive in a 5.25" bay. It lets you position a 3.5" drive in a computer case as needed (without being confined to the 3.5" bay determined by the case layout). The drive adapter bracket features an open-faced black bezel that provides a snug, secured fit for installed drives.
Ask Our Experts800.606.6969
Hello, Log InAccount & Orders
Key Features
- 3.5" Front Bay Cut Out
- Open-Faced Plastic Bezel
The 3.5" to 5.25" Front Bay Bracket Adapter from StarTech is a plastic, drive adapter bracket that lets you install a 3.5" drive in a 5.25" bay. It lets you position a 3.5" drive in a computer case as needed (without being confined to the 3.5" bay determined by the case layout). The drive adapter bracket features an open-faced black bezel that provides a snug, secured fit for installed drives.
More DetailsStarTech BRACKETFD Overview
Fits in any 5.25" front bay
3.5" front bay cut out
Black plastic bezel
Includes mounting screws
Applications
Mount a front bay 3.5" drive into a computer case where only a 5.25" bay is available
Mount a 3.5" front bay connector panel like the StarTech (35BAYPANELBK) Black Multi Port Panel into a computer case where only a 5.25" bay is available
UPC: 065030820790
StarTech BRACKETFD Specs
Key Specs
Drive Size | |
System Bay Size |
System Bay Size | |
Certifications | |
Dimensions |
Packaging Info
Package Weight | |
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) |
StarTech BRACKETFD Reviews
Perfect Fit
By Bushmaster78FS
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2024-01-18
Great fit for my Corsair Carbide 200R midtower case where I used this BRACKETFDBK to mount a Graugear Multi Front Panel with USB 3.2 Gen 2 HUB. Needs a little wiggling due to plastic nature of the bracket but great value for what it is.
By lazlong
Rated 4 out of 5
Date: 2015-08-18
Product works fine. The front plate has two tabs that hold it into the body of the reader, and one tab broke when I was removing the front panel of my case, making an adjustment during assembly. It should have held up a bit better.
See any errors on this page?