FLM 2D Bubble Level

FLM 2D Bubble Level

FLM 2D Bubble Level

B&H # FL2AXBLVL MFR # 12 02 901
FLM 2D Bubble Level

FLM 2D Bubble Level

Show MoreLess


Now Viewing:

More on the Way
Expected availability: 3-7 business days

Product Highlights

  • Shoe-Mount Foot
  • Mount to Hot Shoe
  • 2-Way Bubble Level
  • For Vertical and Lateral Tilting
$0 VA Sales Tax Collected on This Item

You Pay: $8.91

Add to Wish List Item in Wish List

FLM 12 02 901 overview

  • 1Description

The 2 Axis FLM 2D Bubble Level has two vials or tubes to measure forward, backward, and lateral tilt to align your camera vertically or horizontally. The level has a hot shoe foot to place the level on your camera.

In the Box
FLM 2D Bubble Level
  • Limited 10-Year Warranty
  • Table of Contents
    • 1Description

    FLM 12 02 901 specs

    Dimensions (L x W x H) 1.3 x 0.74 x 0.74" (33 x 19 x 19 mm)
    Weight 0.38 oz (11 g)
    Packaging Info
    Package Weight 0.04 lb
    Box Dimensions (LxWxH) 1.3 x 0.6 x 0.6"

    FLM 12 02 901 reviews

    2D Bubble Level is rated 4.0 out of 5 by 2.
    Rated 5 out of 5 by from great little addition I needed something I could see clearly and I could use with the monopod. The tripod has it built in but I am often shooting without it. This little wonder fits in the smallest of bags. It is now, along with my adjustable ND filter, a permanent part of m =y "grab-n-go" kit.
    Date published: 2018-06-16
    Rated 3 out of 5 by from A little off. Same as Vello and others? Checking it against the camera's own level guide as well as along a beam level, it's a little off. On the roll axis, the bubble has to be touching the right line, not sitting between the 2 lines. According to my phone's level app, it's off by a degree. Not the end of the world, but they can certainly do better. In the store I tried the Vello version for comparison. Looks exactly the same, and was also off in the exact same way. Seems like B&H sells half a dozen rebrands of the same thing. Also, I don't understand why the foot on the rectangular side is not square; it goes in the camera's shoe only one way. I also don't understand why the foot on the square end overreaches the level and overlaps the foot on the rectangular side, so that even if the foot on the rectangular side were square, you still wouldn't be able to mount it on the camera sideways. And a sideways mount would've be preferable. (This is probably hard to imagine, but get your hands on one, and these things will be obvious.) All in all, it could benefit from a couple design tweaks and tighter tolerances. If the other brands are indeed the same thing, it certainly doesn't pay to spend the extra money.
    Date published: 2018-06-28
    • y_2018, m_10, d_18, h_14
    • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
    • cp_1, bvpage1
    • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_2
    • loc_en_US, sid_1265741, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
    • clientName_bhphotovideo
    Be the first to review this item

    FLM 12 02 901 Q&A

    FLM 12 02 901 accessories

    See any errors on this page? Let us know.