Video Chat with a B&H Expert & Get Photography Advice Live!

Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens

BH #CA2470RF • MFR #3680C002
Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens
Key Features
  • RF-Mount Lens/Full-Frame Format
  • Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22
  • Three Aspherical Elements
  • Three Ultra-Low Dispersion Elements
Poised to be the new workhorse zoom, the Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM is a versatile wide-angle to portrait-length lens characterized by its bright, advanced, and intuitive design. The constant f/2.8 maximum aperture suits working in difficult lighting conditions and also enables greater control over depth of field. The optical design incorporates a series of aspherical and Ultra-Low Dispersion elements, which greatly reduce a variety of aberrations throughout the zoom range in order to produce sharp and clear imagery. An Air Sphere Coating has also been applied to suppress flare and ghosting when working in strong lighting conditions.
Temporarily Out of Stock
Expected availability: 2-4 weeks
$200/mo. suggested payments for 12 Mos.
with the credit card.§ 
or Save the Tax with the credit card. 
Protect your Gear
Add a protection plan from $94.99
Trade in your gear for cash: Learn more

True Know-How

Ask Our Experts

See any errors on this page? Let us know


Does this lens have the same zoom adapter that ...

Does this lens have the same zoom adapter that the Canon EOS 18-135mm USM lens has for video?
Asked by: Jared
No. The PZ-E12 zoom adapter is unique and only works with the EF 85-135 lens you mentioned.
Answered by: dennis
Date published: 2019-09-25

I purchased this lens for videos wondering if I ...

I purchased this lens for videos wondering if I could go with out the IS and get the 28-70 F2 Instead?
Asked by: Gary
I don't do a lot of video (mostly still photos with my R). But IS is going to make your videos much less shaky if you are hand holding. If you are using a tripod or gymbal, than that is another story of course. Aside from that, I picked the 24-70 since the 28-70 F2 is much larger and heavier, and uses a larger and less common filter thread size; with the only advantage being the larger max aperture. And the 28-70 F2 is more expensive too, of course. The F2 would be nice to have, but I didn't personally think it justified the extra size, weight, cost, and expense.
Answered by: dennis
Date published: 2021-02-11

When used in manual focus mode, is this ...

When used in manual focus mode, is this considered parfocal?
Asked by: Jacy
No, only high end cine lens are parfocal.
Answered by: Rob
Date published: 2021-10-03

I have canon R6 and a 24-105mm RF lens f/4. I am ...

I have canon R6 and a 24-105mm RF lens f/4. I am wanting to learn studio lighting concentrating on newborns and children. Is my lens ok for this or would the 24-70mm 2.8 work better for me because of the lower aperture? Thanks for any help and recommendations.
Asked by: Melinda
The RF 24-70mm f/2.8 has the advantage of the extra stop, however your current RF 24-105mm f/4 gives you the longer telephoto range. As far as which is the better lens, that would depend on whether you need the extra stop or the longer telephoto range.
Answered by: Kirk
Date published: 2021-01-07

I have three following questions: - I noticed RF ...

I have three following questions: - I noticed RF lenses have no distance scale, and I don't know why?. - Can you manually override the focus like the EF 24-70 2.8L II lens ("Full time manual focus override")? - Is this RF 24-70 Strong Weather Sealed like the EF 24-70 2.8L II? Thank you very much!
Asked by: PABLO
Absence of focus distance scale is presumably for aesthetic reasons, and possibly to make room for the control ring (which IMO is extremely useful, and much more so than the focus distance scale). You can certainly have full time manual focus override. Although I had to go into settings to enable it. In the default settings, turning the focus ring (when lens is switched to AF) does nothing. But easy enough to change that setting. This lens is weather sealed, presumably to the level of other Canon "L" lenses. Although I haven't seen a teardown or direct comparison. But the build quality is excellent, and I expect the level of weather sealing is the same.
Answered by: dennis
Date published: 2020-05-14

There's a slight click when zooming in and out, ...

There's a slight click when zooming in and out, is this normal?
Asked by: Ignacio
The only sound you get when you completely zoom out or zoom in Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Lens is the sound of the lens barrel taps its maximum point. If you hear a click throughout the zoom it may be due to a manufacturing defect or accidental damage.
Answered by: llinelva
Date published: 2022-03-02

Can someone who has used the RF 24 - 105 lens ...

Can someone who has used the RF 24 - 105 lens give some quick comparison’s please.
Asked by: jonathan
We agree that the RF 24-70mm f/2.8 offers faster focusing, is better in low light and a bit sharper. The right choice really comes down to what your needs are.
Answered by: Kirk
Date published: 2022-04-17

This looks like great glass, but if money is an ...

This looks like great glass, but if money is an issue is it really worth the extra money over the EF mark ii? Main use would be weddings, quinceaneras and events with on camera flash.
Asked by: Jake
Agree with the previous answer to the extent that only you can judge whether the cost is worth it or not. It depends on how much you value that money versus how much you will value the added benefits. Everyone has a different budget. And how you use your gear matters as well. If you are a pro, then the cost of the RF lens might be made up in a gig or two. And the investment is justifiable, for gear used to make a living. Much less so, if you are an amateur enthusiast. Plus, you haven't clarified whether the EF version is something you already own, or considering purchasing, which makes a big difference. If you own the EF 24-70 f2.8, than the cost of purchasing the RF version is tough to justify. The image quality while slightly sharper on the RF, is probably not going to be noticed by most in everyday usage. You are really only gaining image stabilization. Although there is something unquantifiaby nice about using a native RF lens, and not having to mess with adapters. Even in this case, where the RF version doesn't actually have an advantage in length/weight versus the adapted EF version (comparison is almost identical, even including the additional length/weight of the adapter). Plus, the RF design is much more updated and modern in feel and appearance. This is just an aesthetic quality of course. But one I certainly appreciate, personally. But again, others might not care about this. Now, if you are talking about BUYING one versus the other (don't currently own the EF version) than the answer is a little different. Obviously, the cost comparison is this case is much less, as you are just considering the price difference, and can more reasonably be justified. Personally, I'd go for the RF. Paying the additional cost for IS and a native RF mount is almost a no brainer in this case. Not a lot of money, to upgrade from an EF lens that is long in the tooth at this point, and long overdue for an (Mk III) update that will most likely never come.
Answered by: dennis
Date published: 2019-11-26
  • y_2022, m_6, d_29, h_21CST
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_3.0.32
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_29
  • loc_en_US, sid_1502500, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HAS_STAFF_ANSWERS, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_bhphotovideo