Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 Reviews
Portability
By James
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2023-07-19
I've long wanted a light weight, macro setup, with the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens on my Zfc, I have a hand-holdable, carry around macro. I have a few F-mount 105's, a 60mm F-mount macro (AF unfortunately) and even the 70-180mm Micro lens, but those all require serious planning, but with my Zfc & the MC 50mm, I can shoot excellent but casual macro shots.
A Great, Lightweight Macro Lens
By Kevin
Rated 4 out of 5
Date: 2022-10-19
I had a Nikon Z5 mirrorless camera for a while, but didn't really use it until I purchased the 50mm macro lens. Now I use the camera almost every day - I love how lightweight and easy to use this combo is.
Amazing lens!
By John
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-07-19
I got this lens for doing some up close flower photography but also for digitizing negatives. It works extremely well
Great lens for the money
By Jake
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-07-10
Great lens given the price, sharp, which is a given for this focal length , focus hunts a little at close distances when doing macro shots.
Great compact prime that happens to have macro capability
By Chris
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-06-07
This is a great little lens, for the right use cases. As many others have pointed out, if macro capability is your top (or only) priority, you owe it to yourself to save a little bit longer and spring for the 105mm. With this lens, you have to get really close to get 1:1 magnification, and at close focus, effective aperture decreases. The lens is plenty sharp, but those things CAN create headaches. Plus, if you got your Z camera with a 24-70, the 105mm obviously extends your range a bit (whereas the 50 does not).
Where this lens shines is as a compact, lightweight walkaround lens with some weather resistence. On paper, it's not as bright as the 40mm pancake (muffin?), but IMO, it outperforms the 40mm even when you stop the latter down.
For me (Z5 owner who shoots mostly static subjects and who spends a lot of time walking & hiking around), the 28mm and 50mm f/2.8s make for a more appealing combo than 28 f/2.8 and 40 f/2.
If I wanted to pick just one compact prime to carry, hands-down it would be the 50mm f/2.8. It costs more, but delivers more. Plus, as good as the Z 50mm f/1.8 lens is, I think the difference is bigger on the higher-res cameras. With a 24MP Z5, I just didn't think the difference was big enough (for what I do) to justify losing macro capability and adding size & weight. If this all sounds reasonable, you'll probably like this lens a lot. If you can't wrap your head around passing up the superior optics of the 50mm 1.8, or if macro photography is your bread and butter, you won't be as thrilled with this lens.
Nice lens for the price !
By Sam
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-05-25
I bought this to replace an old Nikon 60mm 2,8 D Macro lens that i've used for a lot of years. So farm I'm happy with it , much better quality than the old D lens i was using. A+
One of the worst z lens
By Xfan
Rated 3 out of 5
Date: 2023-06-27
This lens is not responsive in manual focus mode, and softer than my old NIKKOR 55 3.5 micro lens
Lens
By Angeline
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2023-02-05
A great lens, sharp