One aspherical element is featured in the optical design, which limits distortion and contributes to a high degree of sharpness for accurate rendering. This unique lens also sports a close 5.1" minimum focusing distance for close-up shooting and the STM AF motor enables smooth and quiet focusing performance to suit both photo and video applications. The lightweight design and broad field of view also make this lens an enticing option for vlogging and content creation.
- RF-Mount Lens/Full-Frame Format
- Aperture Range: f/2.8 to f/22
- One Aspherical Element
- Super Spectra Coating
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Overview
One aspherical element is featured in the optical design, which limits distortion and contributes to a high degree of sharpness for accurate rendering. This unique lens also sports a close 5.1" minimum focusing distance for close-up shooting and the STM AF motor enables smooth and quiet focusing performance to suit both photo and video applications. The lightweight design and broad field of view also make this lens an enticing option for vlogging and content creation.
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Specs
Focal Length | |
Maximum Aperture | |
Lens Mount | |
Lens Format Coverage | |
Focus Type | |
Image Stabilization | |
Filter Size |
Maximum Aperture | |
Minimum Aperture | |
Lens Mount | |
Lens Format Coverage | |
Angle of View | |
Minimum Focus Distance | |
Maximum Magnification | |
Optical Design | |
Diaphragm Blades | |
Focus Type | |
Image Stabilization | |
Filter Size | |
Dimensions (ø x L) | |
Weight |
Package Weight | |
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) |
Canon RF 16mm f/2.8 STM Reviews
among the worst Canon lens I've owned
I really really REALLY wanted to like this lens. I love shooting wide, and a tiny fast ultrawide would let me have one on hand everywhere all the time. Unfortunately, the rendering of this lens is quite poor. To be sure, you can still get good results depending on how and what you shoot. If you give it good lighting, forgiving scene, lots of post work... sure, you can get it to produce decent images. But the lens is very finicky and fragile (not physically, but in image quality). There are plenty of other reviews about how distorted the image is before it's corrected computationally. I have many other lenses that do this, too, and I have no problems with this technique in general, but this lens seems to have to correct so much that it still ends up with a pretty poor distortion and sharpness falloff. The contrast on this lens is also frustratingly inconsistent, regularly leading to an almost HDR-like flatness when the light isn't bright sunlight. An f/2.8 lens is supposed to be usable in the shade and indoors, and yet this lens just doesn't look good. Even when the image is technically fine and at its best, it's aggressively lacking in that ineffable rendering quality of microcontrast or the [Zeiss/Leica] look or 3D pop that people argue over. I've looked at samples from other photographers to see if I had a bad copy, but I see the same thing there, too. If the samples generally look good to you, maybe this won't bother you, and you'll be happy with this lens. But I have to say this is one of the worst-rendering Canon lenses I've ever owned. It's really too bad, because it's so easy on the pocket and pocketbook. If you don't have to go so wide, the 28/2.8 pancake is a much better option.
Makes my R5 into a glorified Iphone
If I had lost it, I can't see it being worth the money to repurchase this lens. Sure, it's got some attractiveness in the price dept., But the picture itself just isn't worth it, it isn't special in any regard. Not to say that It isn't bad, its just slightly better than your iPhone will get you.
So far, so good
For the $200 sale price, this lens is fine. It's not L quality, but you can't expect that for a fraction of the L price. If you want a budget ultra wide angle lens, this is a good one.
Great service! Love the lens
I was able to get such a good deal on the rf 16mm lens. I couldn't believe it and bought instantly. My order shipped quicker than expected because I live in Hawaii and it usually takes weeks from other websites. I have been scouting for my next purchase on B&H because I know the quality and service is great. I will definitely be a return customer once I save up for my next lens!
Better than the kit zoom
I would really love the Sigma 14mm F/1.4 that I had for my M50 II for the R50. This was the closest subsitute I could get. I use it for YouTube videos at a desk, and it's better than the 15-45 kit zoom, and it's pretty inexpensive.
Perfect supper wide angle lens and light
I bought this lens to replace the EF16-35 L lens. This lens is much lighter, cheaper and I don't need the adopter for R6. I use it much more frequently then the EF16-35, because of its size and weight, also it produce about the same picture quality as of the EF L lens. The only negative is not able to zoom.
Great lens
This lens is so crisp. I love shooting with it. Incredibly wide and with software lens corrections, the distortion is non-existent.
Surprisingly good
At f2.8 it's very sharp in the center but definitely softer near the corners. Stopped to f5.6 it's just as sharp at the corners as the RF24-105 f4 which is a notoriously sharp lens. You must stop to f5.6 to get the full effect tough; f4 isn't any better than f2.8. With IBIS and electronic stabilization on my R6mkII you have enough stabilization for good looking hand-held walking-around video. Not GoPro stable but pretty stable. I would have preferred separate focus/control rings and L-series build, but the rear-most element APPEARS to be fixed so any dust/moisture that enters the lens may not get into the camera... I'm a mechanical engineer but I can't tell for sure. I am happy with my purchase.
YOUR RECENTLY VIEWED ITEMS