FUJIFILM 400 Color Negative is a high-speed, daylight-balanced, 35mm color negative film offering a wide exposure latitude for greater versatility as well as a fine grain structure with consistent and accurate colors. With a nominal sensitivity of 400 ISO, this versatile stock can serve a multitude of applications under a wide range of lighting conditions. From sun-drenched vacation snaps to a flash-lit night scene, this color film is designed to produce quality prints.
- Consistent and Accurate Colors
- ISO 400/27° in C-41 process
- Rich Saturation, Optimized Skin Tones
- Fine Grain, Wide Exposure Latitude
FUJIFILM 400 Color Negative Film Overview
FUJIFILM 400 Color Negative Film Specs
Film Format | |
Number of Exposures | |
Film Type | |
ISO/ASA Film Speed | |
Color Balance | |
Film Processing | |
Number of Rolls |
Package Weight | |
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) |
FUJIFILM 400 Color Negative Film Reviews
Oversaturated, low sharpness, messy grain
I knew going in that this was just a rebranded Kodak film. Speculation on the internet pointed to UltraMax and I do get strong UltraMax vibes from this film but comparing the spectral sensitivity curves for both would suggest otherwise. Either way, I'm just not a fan of this film. Like Ultramax, Fuji 400 has over saturated and unrealistic colors, low sharpness, and an ugly, intrusive, and messy grain structure. I took a slew of shots of my black eyed susans and the gold color turned out somewhat greenish that I wasn't able to correct it in post. Conversely, the greens came out somewhat yellowish. The shot of the ivy in particular is a good example of this. the lighter green leaves at the bottom are a bit yellow-green and overall too saturated. The ivy was not that green in real life. Viewed here, the photos don't look bad as far as grain is concerned but viewed full screen it shows a messy grain that has lots of color noise. It would also be apparent just how unsharp this film is as well. If you're lucky you can nail a few shots and they come out looking decent but the large majority of my roll was a waste. I'm likely done shooting color negative film for now. Kodak's more affordable offerings, with the exception of Gold 200, are poor quality and they're just too expensive to be this bad. I have two more rolls of this stuff and I don't even want to shoot it. I'm not wasting $20 anymore on film and development for five decent shots. I'll stick to B&W where there are many better choices for film at more affordable prices and with more reliable and predictable results.
YOUR RECENTLY VIEWED ITEMS