Essa lente Di é atualmente a mais compacta e leve na história das lentes de zoom rápido. Sua forma compacta faz com que ela pareça uma lente zoom padrão, mas fornece a versatilidade oferecida por uma abertura máxima constante, e definitivamente irá reformular os horizontes da fotografia.
Recursos como elementos de vidro LD e Focagem Interna colocam essa lente na mesma categoria das lentes profissionais que as lentes muito maiores e mais caras da Tamron.
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Focal Length | 28 - 75 mm |
| Aperture |
Maximum: f/2.8 Minimum: f/32 |
| Camera Mount Type | Canon EF |
| Format Compatibility |
35mm Film / Full-Frame Digital Sensor Canon (APS-C) |
| Angle of View | 75° - 32° |
| Minimum Focus Distance | 1.08' (33 cm) |
| Magnification | 0.256x |
| Maximum Reproduction Ratio | 1:3.9 |
| Groups/Elements | 14/16 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 |
| Features | |
|---|---|
| Image Stabilization | No |
| Autofocus | Yes |
| Tripod Collar | No |
| Physical | |
|---|---|
| Filter Thread | 67 mm |
| Dimensions (DxL) | Approx. 2.87 x 3.62" (7.29 x 9.19 cm) |
| Weight | 1.12 lb (508 g) |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Wonderful Lens
I spent about 3 months researching the lens I wanted to replace my kit lens for my Canon Xti. I had used my friends Canon 24-70 f2.8 and was thoroughly impressed with it&r...Read complete review
I spent about 3 months researching the lens I wanted to replace my kit lens for my Canon Xti. I had used my friends Canon 24-70 f2.8 and was thoroughly impressed with it’s quality, build, focal range, and constant 2.8 throughout. However, that lens was wayyyy out of my budget since I am only a hobbyist/enthusiast . So I searched the web over and over and narrowed my selection down to the Sigma 24-70 f2.8 and this Tamron. The reviews seemed neck to neck for a majority of them, however the most detailed reviews I found put the Tamron ahead in terms of image quality. Some of the reviews dating back to the year 2003 had some build and lens quality complaints, however, the more recent reviews point to Tamron having fixed those problems since then. The Sigma was also just too big for my taste and would not have fit well for my liking on my Xti (I handled it at a local retailer). And at a cheaper price and a few mms longer the Tamron got my vote. The only pitfall I have with the lens is the external rotation of the lens when focusing (please note that the lens end itself does not rotate when focusing, only the external ring). But that is easily overcome by not grabbing that part of the lens when shooting. It is a great add-on to the kit lens I have and the first 100 shots have come out exactly to my liking and expectations. It’s fast, quiet enough for me (not as quiet as the Canon USM lens), moderately sized, and excellent.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
good quality for the price
I bought this lens because of the price and focal range. I am shooting with a Canon EOS 5D. I only have experience with EF mount lenses so this review may not be helpful ...Read complete review
I bought this lens because of the price and focal range. I am shooting with a Canon EOS 5D. I only have experience with EF mount lenses so this review may not be helpful for nikon users.
I would have preferred to buy the Canon 24-70 f/2.8L lens, but the Tamron is less than half the cost.
Most reviews say this lens has good center sharpness but is a bit softer in the corners. I found this to be true. Other reviews called this lens soft on the wide end, and I have also found this to be true as well. The above problems are balanced out, however, by very good sharpness at 40mm and above. The lens handles colors very well, with little or no chromatic aberration and no there is no significant barrel distortion to speak of.
In short, this is a good general use lens. It is not as nice as the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L lens, but it is good for the price. If you are looking for a good wide angle lens for shooting high quality landscapes, I would probably invest in the Canon 16-35mm L lens. However, for general all around use this is a good lens for the price.
Reviewed by 250 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I received this lens in a short amount of time. It works great! The picture quality is amazing!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I use this lens for general photography and wildlife. It is light weight, compact and operates smoothly and clearly. Construction seems very solid. Motor is responsive for the AF.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
Geat lense for the price!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I use this lense primarily for portraiture, but I plan on also using it for landscape shots periodically. This is a great lense, and is unbeatable for the price.
I am particularly impressed with its sharpness, which rivals my fixed 50mm lense. Good job Tamron!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
Needed a reasonably priced fixed fstop lense to use with the canon t2i for video. this is a great buy for the money. maybe not for stills, but for video is perfect.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
My 3 girls are very active in sports,dance,and school activities. I take pictures at all functions. The clarity of this lens is awesome. Very accomodating to the 7d. The pictures are very clear, sharp and bright. Even awesome pics in low light...Nothing to write bad about it...
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I primarily use for video. The combination of the fixed aperture and decent zoom make for an optimal lens for shooting indoors and getting creative shots on the go. No CA whatsoever. Autofocus is slow but if it wasn't then it would just be more expensive. At this price range this lens is fast, fun and versatile.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I use this lens for weddings, event candids and even for sports under the basket at a basketball game,it is sharp and has very good color saturation. I would buy this lens again. It is not fair to compare this to the Canon 24-70mm but I think it does an excellent job.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
It is wonderful. I just want to say.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I start my portrait photos with 28-75 mm is amazing the results i have with this I like a lot I like the range for portraits Is really lite weight easy to adjust and it is cheaper then canno good lences for instance.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I bought this les specifecly for portrait. It is super sharp. Monted on canon 7D.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I needed a lens that allows me to take available light shots. The 2.8 across the range and the zoom range is great.?
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
This lens is was a mega upgrade from the two (kit) lenses that I had for my Canon T2i, (18-55 EFS and 55-250 EFS). Provided you close the glory hole down to a minimum of f/4.0, you'll find yourself not using sharpening tools as much in post. That said, this lens wide open creates such a shallow depth of field at f/2.8 that I have yet to take a picture of my dachshund puppy in which his eyes and nose are both in focus regardless of focal length. The image quality is quite superb and is head and shoulders better than the kit lenses. Considering that this lens is only useful at f/4.0 and smaller, one might consider a cheaper alternative with a greater zoom range. That's my $0.02. Your mileage may vary.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
This lens is my all the time lens. I don't even say it's in my bag because it is always on one camera body or the other. For my general purpose shooting I use a Canon Rebel. In all honesty I've at one time or another photographed with most of the Canon lenses. When shooting portraits I would take this lens over all others. First I never photograph at the longest focal length. First thing I learned in Art School was to never push a lens to its max because you will get blur and/or haze. I do notice when messing around with the lens on its longest focal length there is haze. However besides $1,000 plus lenses I don't know many lenses that won't do this. I've published pictures with this lens and won photo contests as well. Some people have told me they get lens creep with this lens. I have never had that problem. I've been photographing with this lens for four years now and have yet to have a problem. I'd recommend this lens to any beginner or pro. I do hate the lens caps. However you get used to it. It can be tricky to get on the lens well.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
very easy to use.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
Needed a lens for a PIT shoot for a band and this lens was what I determined I needed and it fit the bill perfectly was very quick with the 2.8 aperture was perfect the stage wasn't too dark and the shots came out perfect The auto focus went easy and zoomed in for a single artist and zoomed out for a band shot any thing I wanted it to do it did with fine results.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
Got single person shots got the whole band in shots. Sharp quick and clear. No flashing on the lens from the lights. Zoomed out and zoomed in it works and holds great. Some said the lens focus was slow but I found it to be fine. B&H sent it quick and complete so the rebate was no problem the price was good with no rebate but great with one. Would buy it again if needed Would send a friend to B&H if they needed this lens.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I have had this lens for 7 years and it lives on one of my bodies at all times. There is no higher compliment. I keep itching to upgrade to all L glass but when I look at the output from this lens, I just cant justify spending more money on less reach.
One major warning; I shoot 1.3 and 1.6 crop bodies, on a full sensor the softness and CA on the edges are just too severe to accept, but if you are shooting a crop sensor, this lens is near the top of the line. When you add in it's value for the price, it is head and shoulders above the crowd.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I am a professional photographer and videographer. When looking for a midrange zoom, I compared this lens to its Canon and Sigma counterparts. Surprisingly there is very little difference between them in terms of optical quality, and in some cases, the Tamron and Sigma perform better than the Canon L lens.
For nearly 1/3 of the cost of the Canon 24-70, this is a no-brainer. At f/2.8 both at 28 and 75mm the image is just barely soft, but no more than is expected from a wide-open lens. Stopping down 1/3 stop to f/3.2 the softness is gone and by f/4 the image is razor sharp.
The AF is a bit slow and does make some noise compared to the USM and SWM of Canon and Nikon, however I don't notice it enough for it to be an issue other than with sports photography.
my only complaint is that the lens has a plastic body so I feel the need to coddle it a bit more than my higher-end canon lenses, but it does have a solid feel.
Bottom line: If shopping for a fast mid-range zoom, look no further. the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di is the best value you will find.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Tamron Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Autofocus Lens for Canon EOS:
I really have nothing bad to say about this lens. I use it for portraits. I have to be careful not to have too much movement, even at fairly high shutter speeds to make sure everything is crisp. I have read that at f/2.8 it can be soft, but I have found that to be more due to camera shake. If I concentrate on not moving I produce crisp images with great color and contrast. I did get a B+W expensive filter to put on it [...] and I am glad I did. It is a great lens for the price. I have never used a Canon L series, but if I continue to get great results with this glass I don't see why I would. People also sometimes say the autofocus is noisy. This must be compared to the L-series because compared to my other lenses that is not the case!
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »