The Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner utilizes high-luminance white LED lamps so it is ready to scan immediately, with no warm-up time needed. And of course it delivers spectacular results, with color resolution of 4800 x 9600 dpi, and built-in FARE Level 3 retouching technology helps correct for dust and scratches on your originals, revives faded images and even brightens faces and reduces graininess. Seven easy buttons automate the scanning process, so it's simple to scan copy and create e-mails and multi-page PDFs. Furthermore, to save time, you can batch-scan up to 12 negative frames or 4 slides, either 35mm or medium format. The unit comes with the productive and easy to use picture editing program Adobe Elements v 5.0 (v 4.0 for Mac).
| Scan Quality | |
|---|---|
| Scan Sensor | Linear CCD |
| Optical Resolution | 4800 dpi |
| Hardware Resolution | 4800 x 9600 dpi |
| Interpolated Resolution | 19,200 x 19,200 dpi |
| Color Depth | 48-Bit RGB Color, 48-Bit Grayscale |
| Dynamic Range | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Scan Area | |
|---|---|
| Reflective Scan Area | 8.5" x 11.7" |
| Transparency Scan Area | 10" x 3" |
| Film Formats | 35mm x 12 frames (negatives), 35mm x 4 frames (mounted slides), 22cm x 6cm film strip (120 roll film) |
| Performance | |
|---|---|
| Preview Speed | 2 seconds |
| Scan Speed | Not Specified by Manufacturer |
| Batch Scanning | 12 negative frames or 4 slides (35mm or medium format) |
| Automation | FARE (Film Automatic Retouching and Enhancement) Level 3 retouching technology |
| Connectivity | |
|---|---|
| Interface | USB 2.0 (Hi-Speed) |
| System & Software Requirements |
Windows System
Macintosh System
Note: The latest Mac OS X Leopard driver is available for download under the "Drivers & Downloads" tab on the Canon website. |
| Physical | |
|---|---|
| Light Source | White LED |
| Front Panel Controls | 7 Direct Function Buttons (Scan, Copy, E-Mail and expanded PDF functions) |
| Power Requirements | 120V AC, 60Hz |
| Dimensions (HxWxD) | 10.7" x 4.0" x 18.9" (272 x 102 x 481mm) |
| Weight | 9.2 lbs (4.2kg) |
REVIEW SNAPSHOT®
by PowerReviewsPros
Cons
Best Uses
Most Liked Positive Review
Simplicity + high quality in one scanner
I looked long and hard at the few flatbed scanners on the market and narrowed it down to the Epson Perfection V700 and this Canoscan 8800F. I think I was a minute away from buying...Read complete review
I looked long and hard at the few flatbed scanners on the market and narrowed it down to the Epson Perfection V700 and this Canoscan 8800F. I think I was a minute away from buying the Epson V700 until I used it. It works great and the results were quite beautiful, but honestly in scanning negs, prints and slides in numerous configurations, I could see NO differences between the scans of the Canonscan 8800F. I scanned many images up to 4800dpi and the colors and depth looked so much alike it was impossible to tell which scanner created it. The blacks were black and the definition as sharp as any flatbed scanner I have ever seen or used. I put a friend's Canoscan 8800F through its paces (as I did with the Epson V700) and it was a pleasure to use. If I were reviewing the V700 here, I would not give it 5-stars for other reasons, and compared to the Caonoscan 8800F it just was not as nice a piece of gear to operate. The Canon is significantly cheaper, does a phenomenal job in scanning, and its considerably faster in my opinion. It was a no-brainer.
VS
Most Liked Negative Review
A disappointment
I scan books for a living & had been using old old HP scanners from the mid 1990's. Which were worn out.
So, on the advice of an antiquaria...Read complete review
I scan books for a living & had been using old old HP scanners from the mid 1990's. Which were worn out.
So, on the advice of an antiquarian in Sweden, I got the Plustek, but after a day packed it up & sent it back. Plustek makes machines expressly for copying books, but the software so badly cripples it as to make it useless. Plus, it is only good for B&W. Color scans are hopelessly muddy.
So, having thought about it, I went for the Canon. Canon's been in business 3/4ths of a century, they make all manner of imaging devices, starting with cameras, as well as printers & scanners & lots more. Canon's a bootstrap kind of company. They invent all their own stuff, they do things the hard way, they tend to overbuild. Sometimes the results are quirky, sometimes they're guilty of pandering to the public, but, in the main, they can be relied upon to do a fabulous job. There's good reasons why they're one of the top companies in this field.
And initially I was impressed with the Canon 8800F. It's well-designed, beautifully engineered, nicely thought-out. I am confident it will handle slides extremely well.
But so far as a replacement for the HP's, it's only marginally better than the Plustek. Canon, like Plustek, like all the third party scanner software that I could find, hasn't got a clue how to write basic scanner software. I've got this wonderful machine that simply won't work for what I want.
The Canon will do PDFs, it will do OCR (though the bundled ScanSoft OCR software is not that hot), it will do slides & chromes, 35mm & 120/6x6. And that's it. If that's what you want, then I'm in agreement with all the other reviewers. This is a fabulous machine.
But if you're looking for a scanner, if you scan - I dunno - THINGS at various sizes & various magnifications for various purposes, then you need real software for your machine & the only software I am aware of is the old HP stuff, which only works with the old HP machines, which, to my surprise, are highly prized by guys who do the kind of scanning that I do. There's an outfit in Los Angeles that repairs the things. I'm going to pack up my machines & get them fixed & then go on as before. (The very last thing I did was download the current HP scanner software: No better than the Canon. So no point in swapping the Canon for a new HP.)
The Canon I will reserve for chromes. I've got a few thousand, from a career 30 years ago as a photographer. I'm not interested in digitizing them, but I do need good material for covers for the books I print. My HP's don't have the transparency adapters, I've been stuck for cover materials. So I plan to use the nice new Canon once or twice a month.
REVIEWS
Reviewed by 120 customers
Sort by
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
Needed to copy slides in a hurry, without any photo editing did a more then serviceable job. looking forward to using and learning to digitize my slide and photo albums.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
- one touch scanning action
- multi-scan and crop
- software adjusts exposure on negatives
one con: if scanning sprockets on 35mm film, very time consuming to set exposure levels and then adjust the scan size manually.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
good software, great slide scans
easy to use
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I am using the scanner for color negatives and the results are fantastic. This reasonably priced scanner is a winner.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
For the price, this scanner provided very nice quality scans of color slides, 120 B&W Negatives, and 35MM B&W negatives.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I use it to scan news articles to distribute to several organizantions. I'm amazed at how fast it scans and how great everything comes out. I especially enjoy the email feature.
Just overjoyed at the way this scanner works as compared to my older model.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I bought the Canon CanoScan 8800F as a replacement for my trusty old HP scanner that served well for many years. I bought the Canon scanner because of its high ratings in many reviews and hoped it would live up to those ratings. IT DOES! Even though I have used it only a short period of time, I have tested every function. It's great! Fast warm up, logical process, broad functionality. By using the master menu instead of the machine buttons, I can make extremely sharp copies of documents (set on B&W). The slide copier works great, too. If this machine holds up as well as it has started, it will be a very wise investment.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
My wife uses it for the kids school work. It does an excellent job. Have not tried to scan photo's yet. Would defintely recommend this scanner!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I bought this product mainly for making photos from old film and definitely made a great choice! The colors are outstanding, even better than I had hoped. I only wish it did 110 film but it doesn't supposed too. [...]I will definitely buy from them again, probably a 110 film scanner!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
Have / had an HP scanner that would do negatives & Slides.. worked but was very interactive, having to scan several times and then zoom in ect...
The CanoScan knows how many negatives you loaded and the sharp image is great! Just talked to a person that does professional photos for a company and he only had good things to say too.
I wish I could load more that two strips and a faster scan. About 60 sec per neg.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
Spent years seeking out a great slide scanning alternative to the Coolscan and pro level scanners. This one is great for archiving family pictures and producing near-pro level scans for a flatbed machine.
Software Interface is somewhat awkward on a Mac, but it works once you play around with it.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
This scanner is very fast and detailed, but it picks up every little thing on the paper, not ideal for scanning art, which can give it a dirty, grainy look.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
THIS PRODUCT IS GREAT FOR SCANNING. B&H ALSO OFFERED THE CHEAPEST PRICE [...]. I WILL DEFINITELY RECOMMEND B&H TO YOU AS WELL AS THIS SCANNER.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
Easy to set up. Easy to use. The interface can be set the way you want. The ArcSoft PhotoStudio does not like Windows 7, but everything else works fine. I would recommend this scanner.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
This Cannon would be a 5 star except that the on-board buttons do not work with my Mac. The included scanning software does work great.
I've yet to try it with film negatives. I have thousands that I need to digitize.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
The Canoscan 8800F is not the only product of its kind, but it must be the best. This is my second Canoscan. My 8400F wore out and I knew what to replace it with. [...] Great prices [...]
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I am using this scanner to archive family and travel photographs. It scans quickly and the quality of the scans is excellent. I haven't tried scanning negatives yet. So far, none of the buttons on the scanner do anything either, besides the on and off switch. I don't know if this is because I'm using a Mac instead of a Windows based system.
There seems to be no independent application other than Image Capture with which to activate the scanner- the one shortcoming I can find so far.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I'v had 2 other brand scanners over the yrs. Never could get them to wk. This is simple and one of the easiest piece of equipment I'V EVER had.Haven't used it for everything yet.For what I have it's Great !!!
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
Easy to use. Software is friendly. A little difficult holding the slides in place but once you get the hang of it they come out great - no problem with print quality scans from film or prints.
Pros
Cons
Best Uses
Comments about Canon CanoScan 8800F Flatbed Scanner:
I scan books for a living & had been using old old HP scanners from the mid 1990's. Which were worn out.
So, on the advice of an antiquarian in Sweden, I got the Plustek, but after a day packed it up & sent it back. Plustek makes machines expressly for copying books, but the software so badly cripples it as to make it useless. Plus, it is only good for B&W. Color scans are hopelessly muddy.
So, having thought about it, I went for the Canon. Canon's been in business 3/4ths of a century, they make all manner of imaging devices, starting with cameras, as well as printers & scanners & lots more. Canon's a bootstrap kind of company. They invent all their own stuff, they do things the hard way, they tend to overbuild. Sometimes the results are quirky, sometimes they're guilty of pandering to the public, but, in the main, they can be relied upon to do a fabulous job. There's good reasons why they're one of the top companies in this field.
And initially I was impressed with the Canon 8800F. It's well-designed, beautifully engineered, nicely thought-out. I am confident it will handle slides extremely well.
But so far as a replacement for the HP's, it's only marginally better than the Plustek. Canon, like Plustek, like all the third party scanner software that I could find, hasn't got a clue how to write basic scanner software. I've got this wonderful machine that simply won't work for what I want.
The Canon will do PDFs, it will do OCR (though the bundled ScanSoft OCR software is not that hot), it will do slides & chromes, 35mm & 120/6x6. And that's it. If that's what you want, then I'm in agreement with all the other reviewers. This is a fabulous machine.
But if you're looking for a scanner, if you scan - I dunno - THINGS at various sizes & various magnifications for various purposes, then you need real software for your machine & the only software I am aware of is the old HP stuff, which only works with the old HP machines, which, to my surprise, are highly prized by guys who do the kind of scanning that I do. There's an outfit in Los Angeles that repairs the things. I'm going to pack up my machines & get them fixed & then go on as before. (The very last thing I did was download the current HP scanner software: No better than the Canon. So no point in swapping the Canon for a new HP.)
The Canon I will reserve for chromes. I've got a few thousand, from a career 30 years ago as a photographer. I'm not interested in digitizing them, but I do need good material for covers for the books I print. My HP's don't have the transparency adapters, I've been stuck for cover materials. So I plan to use the nice new Canon once or twice a month.
Displaying reviews 1-20
Previous | Next »