Basic Backyard Astrophotography, Part 1: Introduction


Astrophotography is awesome! But, is it difficult? No! Contrary to some opinions, you don’t have to own a ton of expensive gear, have perfectly dark skies, or have mad technical skills to pull it off. In this short four-part series, we will talk about how you can go out and shoot astrophotographs with basic photographic gear, and then digitally process the images with basic techniques. In the following stories, we’ll be talking stars, discussing gear, studying capture techniques, and learning some post-processing tips for optimizing your digital files.

The digital revolution has made astrophotography accessible to almost anyone with a camera. However, the genre remains one of the most intimidating segments of photography. It’s easy to find websites featuring spectacular astronomical photographs, but when you read the “fine print” or “how I got the shot” information you find things like this:

“I used a 21-inch refractor with a Yellow #12 filter and liquid-cooled homemade CCD in a camera modified for specific wavelengths of light. It was all mounted on a motorized German equatorial mount with the camera taking 120 images over an 8-hour period. I then stacked the images together on my computer using two different software systems (one that I wrote the code for myself) to get the final image after two days of work in Photoshop.”

Because of exaggerated examples like this, many of us think that, to successfully photograph deep sky objects, a photographer has to 1) have the right gear, and a lot of it, 2) know specialized capture methods, and 3) invent varsity post-processing techniques on the computer.

Although I immensely respect (and might be jealous of) the extraordinary effort, awe-inspiring gear, and dedication to the image employed by such photographers, complex capture isn’t exactly the best way to inspire a novice to embark into the world of astrophotography.

Photographs © Todd Vorenkamp

I have been photographing the moon for decades and the sun for years but, honestly, because of the intimidation factor I outlined above, I rarely dabbled in what I would call “true” astrophotography—photographing the planets, stars, Milky Way, and other celestial phenomena of the night sky. But guess what? With a digital camera and a tripod, both you and I can set up in our backyards or a nearby park and get some share-worthy images while enjoying the night sky!


Before we dive in, let’s manage some expectations, and set the mood.

We Are Not Professionals

If we mere mortals had the power to do big-time astrophotos from our home with simple gear, there would be no reason for building gigantic Earth-based observatories and launching expensive telescopes into orbit. If you spend your time looking at NASA imagery of distant galaxies, exploding stars, and cosmic dust, realize that those images were captured with very expensive and highly sophisticated instruments either from orbit or strategically placed on Earth for prime observing. So, even If you have the best equipment available to consumers, don’t expect to capture a Hubble Space Telescope-caliber image at home.

This image is from the Hubble Space Telescope, of galaxy NGC 3368, in the constellation Leo. No, you cannot get this shot from your backyard on Planet Earth, even with the most expensive gear. But, that doesn’t mean that you cannot make your own discoveries, resulting in beautiful images!

The Cosmos

The night sky is chock-full of wonders, and many of those spectacles can be admired through the naked eye, as well as with your camera. While your camera is doing its thing, don’t be afraid to grab a pair of astro binoculars, a spotting scope, or telescope and look toward the heavens. There are amazing sights to take in—much more than the moon, planets, and constellations! When I photographed the total solar eclipse, I can tell you that what I saw with my own solar-protected eyes and through filtered binoculars was way more impressive than any photograph can convey. Similarly, looking at the moon, Jupiter, Saturn, or other aspects of space, through binoculars, a spotting scope, or telescope is more of a feast for the eyes than just looking at a photograph of the same thing. The exception to this rule is deep sky stuff—more on that next.

Your Camera Sees What the Eye Cannot

This is may be the coolest part of astrophotography. Our eyes are very good at seeing in the dark, but when our vision shifts from cones to rods, one thing we don’t see well is color. Guess what? The camera has no such limitations. A nebula that looks like a barely-visible faint brown smear in the night sky through the world’s best astronomical binoculars looks like a vibrant stellar wonderland to your camera. Get ready to discover, with your camera’s eye, the wonders of the heavens! Where did I park my warp-capable starship? You’ll want to go for a ride, I promise you!

Here is a small portion the Milky Way looking toward the galactic core. Fujifilm X-T2; Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 lens at f/2; 13 seconds; ISO 3200.

You Cannot See Everything

Years ago, the Hubble Space Telescope was pointed at a blank (black) area of the cosmos near the Big Dipper’s handle—about 1/30 the width of the full moon—for 100 hours. It took 342 pictures of what looked a black void to ground-based telescopes. After the images were combined and analyzed, 3,000 never-before-seen galaxies appeared. There are approximately 50 billion galaxies out there, but you can only see one with the naked eye—Andromeda. My point is that there is a lot out there, but we can only see and photograph a tiny sliver of a sliver of what makes up the universe as we know it. Knowing we are ground-based observers shooting through an atmosphere that protects us from harm, yet screws up astrophotos, might help you to understand that you won’t be able to see everything the big telescopes and space telescopes can, but…

You Can Make Discoveries

Over the generations, many of the world’s important celestial discoveries were made by amateur astronomers with basic equipment. Since the pros don’t have enough eyes or observatories to cover the entire cosmos all the time, it’s not farfetched to say that you could discover something new in the night sky. You might spot a new comet, an exploding star, or an asteroid passing close to Earth. Regardless, even if it is not a new discovery, seeing something for the first time with your own eyes is a fantastic experience. And, even if it isn’t the most epic photo ever, the first time you photograph a nebula or the Andromeda Galaxy, you’ll be able to show your friends and say, “I took that photo!”

The Milky Way core sets toward the southern horizon in this shot taken with the Fujifilm X-T2; Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 lens at f/2; 15 seconds; ISO 3200.

Let’s KISS (Keep it Simple, Stargazers)

As I wrote earlier, if you’ve considered astrophotography before, you might have been turned off by all the Internet banter about expensive telescopes, abundant filters, complex tracking mounts and rigs, how to deal with star trails, and post-processing stuff like stacking, layer masks, noise reduction, and so on. All that stuff is awesome, and great for astrophotography, and I respect the technical aspects, but it is not good if it deters you from trying to get your own shots. My goal is to tell you how to do this in the simplest way possible. If you find it as awesome as I do, then by all means get more gear! But, for now, let’s shoot with what you already own and process the images quickly!

OK. Are you ready to go explore the night sky with your camera? Click here for Part II of this series.


Ive always wanted to do astro photography but it never works out its just one bright mass in the centere of the screen any tips?

Hey Barry,

Thanks for the question.

There are a few possibilities:

1) Too much light pollution. You will need to reduce your exposure time.

2) Incorrect exposure settings. You are over-exposing the sky, which, if you read the article, isn't a horrible thing to do because you can bring the exposure back in post processing. You might have inadvertently done an ETTR exposure that has the needed information to create a compelling photo after processing.

Where is your location and can you give me an example of your exposure settings?

Thanks for reading!



Hey, todd I sent you the photo of my camera?

Hi Barry,

Good morning! Yes, I got the photo.

Based on your photo...if that is how you set up your camera for night shooting, the problem is that you are using the camera's landscape mode. That mode is probably fine for everyday outdoor landscape photography, but for night/astro stuff, you need to switch to the M or Manual mode and adjust your aperture, shutter speed, and ISO manually.

Let me know if you have questions on specific settings and we can troubleshoot further!



Hi Todd,

I was a professional photographer in another life...I have dabbled in astrophotography a bit. I appreciate your realistic approach to the subject of astrophotography. I cheated and read ahead before posting this comment. It is refreshing to see an article that encourages people to take a spin at hobby instead of pointing to images that require specialized and expensive gear (which I have) but most folks do not. I am glad you have not forgotten the awe of seeing celestial object with you own eyes or the joy of capturing an image yourself and being able to share that image with others.

Clear skies and shoot on...

Hi Joe,

Thank you so much for the kind words! I very much appreciate it.

Most folks will be amazed with what they can get with a basic digital camera and, if they bug bites, they are more than welcome to get more gear...from B&H! :)

Happy New Year!



"Hubble Space Telescope, of galaxy NGC 3368No, you cannot get this shot from your backyard on Planet Earth, even with the most expensive gear."

Although, most anyone can produce a beautiful astrophoto w/ an inexpensive camera and few accessories, I disagree w/ the statement above in regards to images of galaxies.  Here below is a link of  many images produced from the Minnesota backyard of Terry Hancock, w/ his expensive telescope, CCD camera and processing software by Adobe and comparable competitors :) 

Furthermore, I believe it is possible to capture similar images w/ a DSLR Rebel attached to a telescope w/ equatorial mount tripod, an intraferometer (for timelapse) and Adobe Lightroom photo software.


Hey Stephen,

Those are some amazing shots that Mr. Hancock has captured! However, I stand by my statement as there are definite advantages (and challenges) to placing your telescope on the far side of atmosphere!

You can get great shots from Planet Earth, but space is the place if you want to get the best...until someone makes adaptive optics accessible to everyone!

Thanks for reading and sharing the link!