Switching from DSLR or Mirrorless to a Leica M Rangefinder

2Share

Describing the elegant simplicity of the Leica M digital rangefinder camera system to the uninitiated can be tricky. The words of praise that I hear come out of my own mouth often come off as comically paradoxical. “Nope, it doesn’t have autofocus or image stabilization, and oh, the minimum focus distance is probably double that of your DSLR or mirrorless lenses, which is all part of what makes shooting with it such a special experience.” Statements like these are usually met by laughter, or blank, confused stares, unless of course, I’m in the company of someone who’s had the pleasure of spending time with a Leica rangefinder.

When I first got my hands on the Leica M10-P earlier in the year, it was my first time visiting this strange alternate universe that strictly prohibits autofocus, and culture shock set in immediately. Sure, I was used to flipping on manual focus at times when using my Sony mirrorless system for shooting a landscape or a skyline, just to make sure it was the sharpest of sharp, but never without a tripod. To be honest, I’d never even dreamed of trying to stick to manual focus when shooting anything that moves. All of a sudden, manual focus was the only option, and I was kind of at a loss.

My daughter works on a bit of “remote study” from my home office. Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.
My daughter works on a bit of “remote study” from my home office. Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.

Despite having patented autofocus technologies as early as 1960, no Leica M rangefinder has ever had autofocus. Rumor has it that back in the day, the company decided that all its customers knew how to focus manually, and they wouldn’t want to rely on the camera to do it for them. Whether the rumor is true or not (Leica has since incorporated autofocus into the Leica Q, Leica S, Leica SL, and Leica CL/TL camera systems), if you’re switching from your DSLR or mirrorless system to the Leica rangefinder, and you’re as reliant on autofocus as I was, you’re probably going to be a bit uncomfortable at first. But thankfully, there is an extremely handy technique known as zone focusing that really helped me get my bearings with the rangefinder, and it’s surprisingly easy to learn. As I became more comfortable with zone focusing, which helps you understand what your zone of focus is depending on your aperture, using the system slowly started to become more second nature, and my “sharp photo percentage” started to increase.

So why is it worth the trouble? Why not just use a camera with autofocus? For me, the answer is twofold. First, the experience of “getting one” is far more rewarding for me when achieved using the rangefinder. I really feel like I work harder for the picture, and when I do get a great, sharp shot, it’s even sweeter than it would be with a DSLR or mirrorless that has autofocus. Second, the Leica M image quality is just amazing.

Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.
Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.

Authentic, yet saturated colors, razor-sharp focus that falls off naturally and beautifully into bokeh, natural skin tones, and high contrast are words I would use to describe the quality of the images produced by Leica M digital cameras. I find that in general, I don’t feel the need to do much to them at all in post, even when shooting RAW. And that’s coming from someone who, in fact, enjoys working in Photoshop and Lightroom.

Apart from the all-manual focusing system and lack of image stabilization, the Leica M digital rangefinder system does employ some of the exposure-related functionality to which you’re probably accustomed. When you’re learning how to zone focus using the rangefinder, you’ll be pleased to find familiar modes such as aperture priority and auto ISO.

My wife does an aerial about-face as a dear friend whom she hasn’t seen due to the pandemic shows up at their monthly Zoom meeting. Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.
My wife does an aerial about-face as a dear friend whom she hasn’t seen due to the pandemic shows up at their monthly Zoom meeting. Leica M10-R with Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens.

Although still technically manual focus, the system also features focus peaking, which comes in especially handy in low-light situations where using the rangefinder can be difficult. Recently, I had the opportunity to shoot with the high-resolution Leica M10-R with a Summicron-M 28mm f/2 ASPH. Lens that was fitted with the Visoflex (Typ 020) Electronic Viewfinder. The Visoflex (Typ 020) EVF slides easily into the camera's hot shoe, and, I have to say, it makes a world of difference when it’s too dark to see well through the rangefinder.

Leica 10-P and Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. Lens.
Leica 10-P and Leica Summilux-M 35mm f/1.4 ASPH. Lens.

For instance, when my friend Neil asked me to help document his classic guitar collection, the Visoflex (Typ 020) EVF really saved the day. While you wouldn’t think a shoot like this would be so hard to do using manual focus, Neil wanted me to get creative with the lighting, and we ended up using some colored gels to get kind of a moody, dark feel. He insisted that the brand names on the headstocks of the guitars be sharp and readable, and I was having trouble seeing the letters clearly through the rangefinder in light that low, especially with the heavy cast from the gel light. But, through the EVF it was a cinch to achieve precision and tack-sharp focus manually, even in those low-light conditions.

Any way you cut it, if you’re coming from a DSLR or mirrorless camera system and you don’t have any experience whatsoever with an all-manual focus system, there will be a learning curve switching to the rangefinder. But the more comfortable with the rangefinder you become, the more you start to appreciate the visceral, hyper-attentive experience of shooting with one. Have you moved from DSLR or mirrorless to a rangefinder? Either exclusively, or maybe you oscillate back and forth between systems? What has your experience been like? Let us know in the Comments section, below!

2 Comments

Bought a new Leica M 11 on 9/07/22.  My first 35mm rangefinder camera was a gift to me from my dad when I was 14 years old.  My grandfather spent lots of time showing me how to focus, set ISO, aperture, etc.  There was a light meter visible in the view finder.  There were some tricks to loading film also, to get a couple more frames from a roll.  I had that camera until I was in my 30s.  Upon setting up the new  Leica camera all the lessons came back to me.  It really is more fun to shoot with the Leica M 11 than my Canon R 6.  Both are great cameras.  When I use the Leica I feel like I have more control over what I'm doing.  I use the view finder and not the live screen on Leica.  I also like that I can feel the camera mechanically unlike the electronic R 6 in which there is no feedback.  Shooting with the Leica is like driving a stick-shift auto. There's good feedback.  The Leica has a Summicron 35mm f 2.0 lens.  I may get a 50mm or 75mm later.  This is great fun! 

I came from the manual focus world in the late 60s. I can tell you it was kind of like moving from film cameras to digital cameras. With film you took more care with each shot because you were limited by how many shots you had on a roll. With digital, "Katie bar the door". You just kept shooting image after image but lost a little respect for each shot along the way. The thinking was "Why worry?" I'll get it the next time.....  and besides, the shots are "free". The flip side, of course, is about all the shots you would never have gotten with a manual focus system because you weren't fast enough. 

Manual focus isn't difficult once you get used to it. You're forced to pay complete attention each time you press the shutter button.

So which is better?  For me after 50+ years, I'm going back to a rangefinder. I'm not in a hurry so much anymore.