The OneLINK Bridge A/V Interface Receiver from Vaddio connects a non-USB camera and audio source, and bridges to a USB stream for easy connection to USB-based conferencing applications such as Skype for Business, Google Hangouts, and Zoom. This OneLINK Bridge simplifies installation by extending power, video, and control to your Vaddio HDBaseT camera over a single Cat5e cable up to 328'.
Ask Our Experts800.606.6969
Hello, Log InAccount & Orders
Video Chat with a Pro Video Expert - Live
Key Features
- Power, Control, Video, and Streaming
- Single Ethernet Cable Run
- Supports Cable Runs up to 328'
- Two Balanced Audio Inputs
The OneLINK Bridge A/V Interface Receiver from Vaddio connects a non-USB camera and audio source, and bridges to a USB stream for easy connection to USB-based conferencing applications such as Skype for Business, Google Hangouts, and Zoom. This OneLINK Bridge simplifies installation by extending power, video, and control to your Vaddio HDBaseT camera over a single Cat5e cable up to 328'.
More DetailsVaddio OneLINK Overview
Converts any conference room to a BYOD environment, delivering a USB stream for soft conferencing clients
Connects professional A/V equipment to PC applications via USB 3.0 media stream
Simultaneous uncompressed USB 3.0, HDMI 1.4b, and 3 Gb/s HD-SDI
Two balanced audio inputs and two balanced audio outputs
Control via web interface or Telnet
Status lights
UPC: 840077502287
Vaddio OneLINK Specs
General
Compatibility | |
Video Format |
Inputs/Outputs
USB I/O | |
Video I/O | |
Audio I/O | |
Other I/O | |
Cable Distance Supported | |
Power Input |
Power
Power Source | |
DC Input Power |
Physical
Certifications | |
Operating Conditions | |
Storage Conditions | |
Dimensions | |
Weight |
Packaging Info
Package Weight | |
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) |
Vaddio OneLINK Reviews
As promised - but overpriced
By Aaron
Rated 4 out of 5
Date: 2021-09-13
The box does exactly as it promises to do. There is a few more milliseconds delay for camera control, so not recommended if you have to do fast pans, but for camera control in meeting support it works great. I don't feel like it should cost 1/2 the cost of the camera thought. $2000 is a bit pricey for the luxury of not having to find power where the camera is. I'd likely look for an NDI solution in the future.
See any errors on this page?