Details
freeShipBannerCart
Shipping Location
Enter new zip code to refresh estimated delivery time.
Update
Unrecognized Zip Code
General Brand Lintless Cotton White Gloves (12 Pairs)
General Brand Lintless Cotton White Gloves (12 Pairs)
B&H # GBGC
12
Pieces
Show MoreLess
Close
Now Viewing:
$0.00 Tax Collected Outside NY and NJ
You Pay: $6.95
- 1Description
These Lightweight Cotton Gloves are worn when handling negatives and transparencies. To prevent getting fingerprints and smudges on the film.
The gloves are sold in packs of 12 pairs and are sized to fit most hand sizes.
UPC: 793770328282
Table of Contents
- 1Description
| Packaging Info | |
|---|---|
| Package Weight | 0.26 lb |
| Box Dimensions (LxWxH) | 9.0 x 3.0 x 1.0" |
Lintless Cotton White Gloves (12 Pairs) is rated
out of
5 by
34.
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Self-portrait Girl from
Definitely not lintless.
I bought these gloves specifically to use for handling negatives, and I was very disappointed. They are not even remotely lintless. I tried washing a pair, twice even, and they're still covered in lint. Not to mention, I'm a woman and have slender hands, so these gloves really don't even fit my hands that well, either. If you're thinking about buying these, don't.
Date published: 2010-07-09
Rated 3 out of
5
by
Anonymous from
OK gloves
I got these mainly for the reasonable price and the quantity you get. However, they don't fit your hand extremely well. Almost feel irregular. Anyway, they do the trick. They keep my fingers off the prints as I cut. So overall they do they job...I just have to readjust them on my hand at times.
Date published: 2008-11-25
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Anonymous from
i cant use those
bought those to work with acrylic with goal to avoid fingerprint on glossy surface. Size was medium but what we got had at least XL for the length of fingers. So slim but super long finger design so i have to roll those fingers at the tip as result it very had to work with, very uncomfortable and grabbing something is next to impossible. I could not possibly thing that gloves can be such poorly designed. I been through number of gloves and never had such bad experience, some are perfects some are ok.... this once are so bad that they went strait to garbage. Additionally slave is too short, as result you have exposed skin which in my case i can accidentally touch surface and leave oil imprint.
Date published: 2016-06-08
Rated 1 out of
5
by
fastrunner from
only for very small hands
These gloves are too small for my large women's hands and the fabric is very cheap, not so easy to hold a print with these, not recommended.
Date published: 2009-12-27
Rated 5 out of
5
by
A. L. from
An Essential Scanning Accessory...
These gloves are an essential accessory to have when scanning and handling your priceless negatives and slides. They truly do keep dust and skin oils down and help you get a better scan. Digital dust removal is only so effective, so it is always a good idea to keep the film as clean as possible. That way, you spend less time removing dust in your editing program and more time creatively editing your images. Ideally, use these gloves with an antistatic cloth.
Date published: 2013-12-30
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Anonymous from
Seems to work
Bought the pack for a photo class Im taking, need to handle the negatives with care, need it for other photo classes as well. Ive used it a few times now and I havent had any problems with it. I have very tiny hands like a little kid but there seems to be plenty of room for larger hands. No problems with them so far.
Date published: 2013-02-14
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Dale Diver from
Lintless Cotton White Gloves
These gloves were made in India for hands the size of children and not suitable for regular adult sized hands in America. I could barely put them on. It would cost more in postage to return them than what I paid for them so I ate the bullet.
Date published: 2011-01-02
Rated 2 out of
5
by
mscherlacher@ from
ok
These are a bit small, they will stretch onto my fingers but only about 3/4 of the way down my hand. I don't have large hands. They were cheap and I can still use them for the intended pupose (handling and matting large prints).
Date published: 2012-09-11
Be the first to review this item
See any errors on this page?
Let us know.
