Kodak GC/UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures)

Kodak GC/UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures)

Kodak GC/UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures)

B&H # KOGC36 MFR # 6034060
In Stock
Order in the next 0:00:00 to ship today

Product Highlights

  • Daylight-Balanced Color Negative Film
  • ISO 400/27° in C-41 Process
  • Rich Saturation, Optimized Skin Tones
  • Fine Grain, Wide Exposure Latitude
  • Ideal for Scanning and Enlarging
Show moreShow less
$0.00 Tax Collected Outside NY and NJ

You Pay: $4.49

Add to Wish List Item in Wish List

Kodak Gold 400 overview

  • 1Description

Kodak's GC/UltraMax 400 is a high-speed daylight-balanced color negative film offering a wide exposure latitude for greater versatility, as well as a fine grain structure with consistent and accurate colors. Optimized skin tone reproduction makes this film suitable for portraiture while a vibrant overall color palette benefits general and outdoor photography. It has a nominal sensitivity of ISO 400/27° and is well-suited to both scanning and enlarging applications.

This item is one 36-exposure roll of 35mm film.

UPC: 041771403263
Table of Contents
  • 1Description

Kodak Gold 400 specs

Film Format 35mm
Number of Exposures 36
Film Type Color Negative
Film Speed ISO 400
Color Balance Daylight
Film Processing C-41
Number of Rolls 1
Packaging Info
Package Weight 0.1 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) 2.3 x 1.5 x 1.5"

Kodak Gold 400 reviews

GC/UltraMax 400 Color Negative Film (35mm Roll Film, 36 Exposures) is rated 4.6 out of 5 by 191.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Pleasantly surprised I tried this as a less costly alternative (for play) to Portra and Ektar. After getting the negatives back, I was delighted with the results. I shoot this (as with most film) at a default +1EV. Highlight detail recovery isn't as easy as Portra, as expected. Certain landscape shots where the sun is low angle to my back, revealed a decent amount of grain in the blue sky. Other lighting angles; into sun, side light, grain seems to be consistent and tolerable. I'm even pleased with image quality closeup / macro. So for play and experiment you can't beat the quality at this price. Support Film!
Date published: 2016-04-12
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Really great film! I used to use this film regularly before I switched to Ektar 100, and I have to say, for what it costs, it's incredible value. I've taken some night landscape shots with this film, and they came out practically looking like paintings. I've gotten very nice colors with this film in all situations. And despite it being 400 ISO film, it still has almost no grain at all! I enlarged a picture I took with it up to 16x20 inches, and the grain was still very small. I'd recommend this to any photographer on a budget who is devoted to film.
Date published: 2011-03-27
Rated 5 out of 5 by from My favorite cheap film! I tried a roll just because I was out of Ektar and Portra. The end result surprised me to the point that I bought 10 more rolls and started taking multiple portraits outdoors. The color is beautiful, the leaves, grass, flowers, and skin tones come out beautifully, and the grain is pretty small despite the film being ISO400. I am ordering more.
Date published: 2016-03-31
Rated 4 out of 5 by from My Preferred Inexpensive Film I am relatively new to film but I've shot about 40 rolls in the last 2 months and experimented with at least three major cheap color films: 1. Fuji Superia 400 2. Lomo 400 3. Kodak Max 400 I shoot street style stuff and this is my daylight film. I switch to B&W at night. The short synopsis is Fuji = very saturated color with a slightly cool base. Lomo = Magenta cast to everything, not particularly sharp or contrasty. Kodak = warmish, sharp and contrasty enough for me. I like the response in lower light better than either the Fuji or Lomo. Lomo, especially seems to do worse for me in lower light. While on this learning curve, I think I'm going to stick with the Kodak. As my eye develops I might upgrade to the pro grade films but for cheap color film, the Kodak is good enough and the best of these three.
Date published: 2013-12-10
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great film for a great price I was apprehensive at first to try this film since it was the most basic and general film I could find. But after a while I did try it and I was pleasantly surprised. Everything looks really nice on this film. Indoors look okay, but outdoors look pretty exceptional
Date published: 2014-07-31
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Vibrant, perhaps too much so Somewhat disappointed with this Kodak color film, that I recently used in conjuction with Kodak Ektar 100, a much more pleasing film. Colors are vibrant and not particularly natural looking, but certainly give a distinctive look. I found this film easy to overexpose and lacking in latitude. Grain is average for 400 speed film. If you are looking for a relatively highly saturated and rich look, you will find this film to your taste but it is not to mine. It does, however, lend itself to artistic use of strong color.
Date published: 2014-10-21
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Great Film for the Price! I shoot and develop my own C-41 films at home. I have tried many different brands of film (Fuji, Kodak, Agfa, Ferrania, etc.) and Kodak 400 is one of my favorites. PROS: For a 'cheap' film, Kodak 400 is surprisingly fine-grained and has good color balance. It has a wide tolerance for over/under-exposure. Kodak 400 also is good for scanning. It always produces reliable negatives that scan well in a hybrid analog/digital workflow. CONS: The colors are not as 'rich' as Portra or Ektar. Kodak 400 produces muted and neutral colors, so the images lack some of the 'wow' factor of Kodak's premium color films. Anyway, for the price Kodak 400 is a great film. It's one of my favorite daily walkaround films.
Date published: 2015-06-12
Rated 4 out of 5 by from good quality considering the price I originally bought this film from a local store after inheriting a Pentax P30. I bought this film to test the cameras working grade and was not disappointed. The film has a limited colour range although it does work well with blues and green hues. The grain of the film is very low and I was overall surprised by the quality after seeing past reviews of this film before purchase. I will buy again simply for the low price and above average quality.
Date published: 2018-01-21
  • y_2018, m_9, d_17, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_191
  • loc_en_US, sid_27719, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_bhphotovideo
Be the first to review this item
Customer Photos

Kodak Gold 400 Q&A

Kodak Gold 400 accessories

See any errors on this page? Let us know.