Video Chat with a Photography Expert - Live

Foma Fomabrom VC Fiber-Based/111 Paper, 42.5"x33' Roll (Glossy)

BH #FOF4233G • MFR #4244233
Print
Foma Fomabrom VC Fiber-Based/111 Paper, 42.5"x33' Roll  (Glossy)
Special Order
Expected availability: 6-10 Weeks
No Store Display
This item cannot be canceled or returned.
Free Standard Shipping
Ask an Expert
800-952-1815

Foma Fomabrom VC Glossy Overview

Fomabrom Variable Contrast Fiber-based Variant 111 Black and White Printing Paper is a variable contrast, neutral tone, black and white enlarging paper with a double-weight fiber base.

The use of yellow and magenta colored filters permits selection of the desired contrast from a range of grades similar to that of graded papers
Use with Ilford Multigrade, Kodak Polycontrast or with enlargers that utilize a variable contrast or dichro color head

Foma Fomabrom VC Glossy Specs

Item Type
1x Paper Roll
Size
42.5" x 33' / 108 cm x 10.1 m
Paper Type
Negative
Base Type
Fiber Base
Surface Finish
Glossy
Contrast
Multigrade
Tone
Neutral
ISO
R9001
Packaging Info
Package Weight
11 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)
45.25 x 5.75 x 5"

Foma Fomabrom VC Glossy Reviews

Don’t know what to think

By Tim
Rated 3 out of 5
Date: 2026-02-02

I bought this paper a while back and ended up using something else. I’m beginning a new project and thought I’d see how this paper looks. I did a comparison print with Foma MG from a decent 4x5 negative. I’ve been using the Foma MG and have an issue with what I feel is excessive dry down. Other than that, I believe MG to be really nice paper. I started with the Fomabrom and found it’s two stops faster than the MG. I also found it to be kind of flat. I thought maybe my paper was fogged because it seemed so fast and so gray so I put an unexposed strip in the developer and it was fine. I got what I thought was a decent print and switched to the MG. I really can’t express how shocked I was by the difference. The MG was beautiful. I’d say it was luminous. What was muddy with the Fomabrom transformed into beautiful lights and darks. I find it hard to believe there wasn’t something in what I was doing that worked with the MG but not the Fomabrom. It’s difficult for me to comment on this paper because I can’t believe there’s not a reason for it being muddy but I’ll stick with MG.

Poor Quality Control

By angus
Rated 2 out of 5
Date: 2022-08-05

I have a love/hate relationship with this paper. It comes from the factory exposed on the corner about 50% of the time. Some packs it is every sheet others not a one.The emulsion is also very soft and peels off. It is very noticeable on the black edges of contact sheets. I have notified Foma. IT IS A PAIN TO RETURN FOR A CREDIT not because of B&H but because it interupts my workflow.

See any errors on this page?
Whatever You Need, We've Got It