Video Chat with a Photography Expert - Live

Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask

BH #LOFT35 • MFR #Z360N
Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask
Key Features
  • For Flatbed Scanners with Backlight
  • Holds 35mm Negatives Flat & in Place
  • Allows Scanning of Sprocket Holes
  • Works with Non-Standard Frames
The Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask holds your 35mm negatives flat and in place so you can properly scan them with a standard flatbed scanner with a backlight/transparency unit.

Unlike other scanning masks, the DigitaLIZA accommodates the digitization of experimental analog photographs by scanning the whole negative strip, including the sprockets, without defining the frames individually. This lets you scan overlapping exposures, doubles, triples, and panoramas.

In Stock
$44.90
Ask Our Experts
800.606.6969

Lomography Z360N Overview

The Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask holds your 35mm negatives flat and in place so you can properly scan them with a standard flatbed scanner with a backlight/transparency unit.

Unlike other scanning masks, the DigitaLIZA accommodates the digitization of experimental analog photographs by scanning the whole negative strip, including the sprockets, without defining the frames individually. This lets you scan overlapping exposures, doubles, triples, and panoramas.

Scanning area is 9.1 x 1.3" (230 x 33mm)
Distance between film and the scanning plate is 0.05" (1.2mm)
UPC: 839228003988

Lomography Z360N Specs

Film/Print Format35mm
Maximum Scan Area9.1 x 1.3" / 230 x 33 mm
Packaging Info
Package Weight0.5 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH)11.1 x 3.7 x 1.15"

Lomography Z360N Reviews

Useless. Cannot get a grip on the negatives.

By Conrad Saya
Rated 1 out of 5
Date: 2022-08-11

Completely useless. The gap is too wide. I contacted the manufacturer and explained the problem but was asked to supply photographs. This could have been a great tool---like their 120mm film holder---but for this design flaw. It exposes the perforations for scanning but sacrifices being able to grip the negatives.

It is ok

By Ricardo
Rated 3 out of 5
Date: 2022-04-04

For some reason my film does not want to stay in the mask.

Poor design, won't hold filmstrip

By Edward
Rated 1 out of 5
Date: 2022-02-18

Why did the designer of this holder pick a window of 33.5mm instead of the 25mm film exposure width, leaving the 35mm sprocket holes to be exposed to the scanner? The 33.5mm opening doesn't leave enough of the film edge to reliably hold the film, especially if there is ANY curvature in the film strip. Extremely poor design, don't waste your money.

Not Quite what I expected.

By Gerald
Rated 2 out of 5
Date: 2022-02-15

It's so precise , that it is a problem. It's made to include the number on the edge of the film strip, but that makes the grip edge very precise. If the negs aren't VERY flat to start , you will get curvature in the neg strip. Plus there is a bunch of screwing around to get the grip just right. If you have the time , fine, It would have been better to clamp the neg very close to the frame (forget the frame numbers) and this would help flatten the neg considerably. Make two versions! To me , the numbers might reference a test print , but since you are changing formats , it's a bit moot. Make some reference notes . I prefer a neg holder from a Dust enlarger ( or any enlarger) which clamps the strip as flat as possible ( it's from an enlarger after all made for printing negs and there is still screwing around , but at least my neg is flat.) . I can also crop . The 120 version is better , but the 35mm needs some kind of edge spacer to center the negs and get max clamping . ( just like an enlarger) . If you want the frame #'s, have at it , but when scanning I prefer flatter negs, and somewhat less time screwing around. BTW, I'm scanning the negs , in a strip, on a light board using 35mm full frame macro 1:1 Two Cdn cents worth!

Best Mask in substation for the Epson Scanner Masks!

By Jamie
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-02-10

I have only owned this for about 2 weeks now but my scanning have been an easier process now. very minimal to no chances of getting newton rings.

total fail

By Thomas
Rated 1 out of 5
Date: 2021-12-27

this product is a total fail, it can not hold 35mm film properly, even a perfectly flat film, the gap is simply too wide. what a disappointment, for such a price, this thing can not fulfill this simple task at all. wondering if the product designers were testing this product, I guess not. I recommend you to look for another solution.

Cannot establish a firm hold on the negative strip.

By Conrad Saya
Rated 1 out of 5
Date: 2022-07-15

The opening is too wide. It cannot hold the negatives well and cannot keep them flat. I wrote to them about the problem but was asked to submit photos of the problem for some reason.

Works Great

By George
Rated 5 out of 5
Date: 2022-07-03

After having used this product I have found that it works great at holding the film to be able to scan the images. On the Epson V600 scanner, I had to cut a piece of chipboard and use it as a spacer, on the side, to have the film sit under the scanning light correctly. Once cut you can put this product in the same spot each time. Very easy to use and the focus is right on. I highly recommend this product and it is superior to the 35mm holder that came with the scanner.

See any errors on this page? Let us know

YOUR RECENTLY VIEWED ITEMS

Will it hold full uncut rolls?

Will it hold full uncut rolls?
Asked by: Joseph
Yes, the following item allows scanning the whole negative strip.
Answered by: hectorm
Date published: 2021-08-17

question

Will this work with an Epson v370 photo scanner?
Asked by: michelle a.
Yes, the Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask would be compatible for use with the Epson Perfection V370 Scanner.
Answered by: Manzell L.
Date published: 2018-08-28

The film boarder will show up with this?

The film boarder will show up with this?
Asked by: Safwan
Yes the Lomography DigitaLIZA 35mm Scanning Mask allows you to scan the border of 35mm film, even the sprocket holes. Of course you can set the crop marks smaller in the scanning software in case you do not want to see the border or sprocket holes.
Answered by: Dan
Date published: 2021-08-24

question

Can this be used on an Epson Expressions 11000XL scanner?
Asked by: Anonymous
Yes it can be used on the Epson Expression 1100XL.
Answered by: Steven C.
Date published: 2018-08-28

question

Can I use the 35mm Film Scanning mask to hold film on a light table while I do a camera scan?
Asked by: Dale
Yes, that should work.
Answered by: Andrea O.
Date published: 2021-11-19

will this work with a canoscan 9000f?

will this work with a canoscan 9000f?
Asked by: Patrick
The requirement by Lomography is that the scanner have a backlight. the Canon Scan 9000f has a backlight so we say you are good to scan.
Answered by: Dennis A
Date published: 2020-07-03

Does it work with Epson L3150?

Does it work with Epson L3150?
Asked by: Sergio
No this will not work with the Epson L3150. This scanning mask can only be used with scanners that have a backlight/transparency unit. Most all in one printers like the L3150 do not have light in the lid to allow for this.
Answered by: Jessica G
Date published: 2021-08-27

t within a scanning aWhat are the exact outer ...

t within a scanning aWhat are the exact outer dimensions of this holder? I want to see if it will ficcessory that I had fabricated. Thanks.
Asked by: Samuel
The Lomography 35mm Film Scanning Mask measures 10 1/8 x 2 7/8 x 3/8".
Answered by: Jeremy
Date published: 2021-12-31
  • y_2022, m_12, d_6, h_21CST
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_3.0.34
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_12
  • loc_en_US, sid_747853, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HAS_STAFF_ANSWERS, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_bhphotovideo