Inkpress Media Metallic Gloss (8.5x11" - 5 Sheets)

Inkpress Media Metallic Gloss (8.5x11" - 5 Sheets)

Inkpress Media Metallic Gloss (8.5x11" - 5 Sheets)

B&H # INMP85115 MFR # MP85115
In Stock
Order in the next 0:00:00 to ship today

Product Highlights

  • 255 GSM Paper
  • Ideal For Portraits, Commercial Displays
  • Metallic Surface
  • Compatible With Most Printer Brands
  • Instant Dry
  • Water, Light, Scratch-Resistant
Show moreShow less
$0.00 Tax Collected Outside NY and NJ

You Pay: $7.50

Add to Wish List Item in Wish List
  • 1Description

Inkpress Metallic Gloss (8.5x11") provides a darkroom-like look to your photos and prints. The paper's high gloss surface is ideal for portraits and commercial displays. Its quick drying time, water-, light-, and scratch-resistance make it an ideal choice for high volume printing.

Metallic high gloss surface
Works with dye, UltraChrome, DURABrite, & HDR ink
Compatible with Epson, Canon, HP, and other major brand printers
Water-resistant, instant dry, light-fast, and highly scratch-resistant
Adds a rich, distinctive look to fine photographs, portraits, and commercial displays
UPC: 879155006683
Table of Contents
  • 1Description
Coating Resin
Basis Weight 255 gsm
Thickness 10 mil / 0.25 mm
Single/Double-Sided Single
Surface Finish Glossy
Quantity 5 Sheets
Sheet Size (W x L) 8.5 x 11" / 21.6 x 27.9 cm
Packaging Infotfaeudyr
Package Weight 0.3 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) 12.2 x 9.0 x 0.5"
Metallic Gloss (8.5x11" - 5 Sheets) is rated 5.0 out of 5 by 4.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Wow! For the right image, this paper is spectacular! I wouldn't recommend it for portraits*, my specialty, but I've used it for flowers and it's stunning. On the down side, it's expensive. *For portraits, I find Inkpress Luster gives the best results.
Date published: 2013-02-26
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Amazing Gloss paper I printed out an underwater photo and there was detail visible that I did not see on the screen. Colors are wildly vibrant and it's well worth the price.
Date published: 2013-01-02
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Great Product and fast Delivery This is exactly what I was looking for. Metallic paper gives great look for black and white photo
Date published: 2012-11-19
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A Find! I have done a project to compare 5 papers for an inkjet look-alike to Ilfochrome. I printed them on an HP Photosmart 8750 using HP Vivera original inks and let the printer manage colors, (which it did fine). My image was color and had a wide gamut from black to white and everything in-between. I compared the prints for gamut, depth of color (subjective), white base, and ease of handling and cost. Pictorico Hi-Gloss White Film, Ilford Prestige Galerie Hi-Gloss Smooth, Moab Metallic Silver 300, Kodak Professional Metallic and Inkpress Metallic Gloss were the five. The results were the following: For gloss: Pictorico and Ilford 5 (best), Moab 3 and Kodak and Inkpress 4. For white base: Pictorico and Ilford 5, Inkpress and Kodak 4 and Moab 3. For color depth: Inkpress 5, Kodak 4, Ilford 3, Pictorico and Moab 2. The choice for me as the best match for Ilfochrome was between Kodak and Inkpress, because I prefer the depth of color shown by the metallic substrate paper. The inkpress looked almost 3 dimensional. Based on the image itself, I woiuld probably favor the Kodak as a general rule, but Inkpress is my first choice for images that can really benefit from the look of the Inkpress Metallic Gloss printing. Just how to describe that is difficult, but you know it when you see it. Unfortunately, providing an image here is not helpful, since the monitor will not duplicate the actual look of the paper. Cost is what drives me to the Kodak Pro Metallic, but maybe others don't find that a major factor.
Date published: 2014-07-18
  • y_2018, m_2, d_17, h_20
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.7
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_4
  • loc_en_US, sid_839261, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_bhphotovideo
Be the first to review this item
Customer Photos
See any errors on this page? Let us know.
tfaeudyr