Archival Methods Lightweight Bleached Cotton Inspection Gloves (Large, 12-Pack)

Archival Methods Lightweight Bleached Cotton Inspection Gloves (Large, 12-Pack)

Archival Methods Lightweight Bleached Cotton Inspection Gloves (Large, 12-Pack)

B&H # ARLWCGL12 MFR # 61-120



Archival Methods Lightweight Bleached Cotton Inspection Gloves (Large, 12-Pack)

Show MoreLess


Now Viewing:

More on the Way
Expected availability: 7-14 business days

Product Highlights

  • For Handling of Photos, Film, Artwork
  • Prevents Oils from Contacting Documents
  • 100% Cotton, Machine Washable

Weight: Lightweight


Not available with current selections

Lightweight Medium-Weight

More on the Way

$0.00 Tax Collected Outside NY and NJ

You Pay: $6.95

Add to Wish List Item in Wish List
Other Buying Options
Used from $3.95

Archival Methods 61-120 overview

  • 1Description

Enabling the safe handling of photographs, negatives, prints, documents, artworks, and other items, this 12-pack of Cotton Inspection Gloves from Archival Methods helps to prevent naturally occurring finger oils from contacting, and potentially damaging, your delicate items. These size large gloves are made from lightweight bleached cotton. The gloves are machine washable and air drying is recommended to prevent shrinkage.

UPC: 813903025724
Table of Contents
  • 1Description

Archival Methods 61-120 specs

Packaging Info
Package Weight 0.15 lb
Box Dimensions (LxWxH) 8.9 x 3.8 x 2.0"

Archival Methods 61-120 reviews

Lightweight Bleached Cotton Inspection Gloves (Large, 12-Pack) is rated 3.9 out of 5 by 39.
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not lint free, not suitable for negative handling/scanning The quality of the fabric and fit of the product is good. However, the gloves are full of lint and anything you touch with these gloves will leave lint on the negatives or prints. If you just clap your hands while wearing these, you will see how much free lint is on the gloves that will be scattered all over. I primarily purchased this to handle negatives while scanning, however it ended up leaving leaving lint on the scanner surface and the negatives, and air blowing before and after handling did not help a lot. I do not recommend this for scanning or handling negatives, as you will have lint show up on your scans regardless of the effort to blow lint away.
Date published: 2017-08-22
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Not Worth the Consideration! I think that the manufacturer needs to qualify what is meant by 'large'. Because this title and photo could easily qualify as false advertising. I have what I think are large hands (4 across the knuckles), and these gloves in no way fit like the picture shows. They barely get to the middle of my palm, much less even to my wrist or below. And my fingers are not even fat, and they are struggling to fit over my fingers. A very stretched-out, tight fit. Also, these gloves have no cuffs like the picture shows. In conjunction with words like small or large, the manufacturer needs to add a range of fitment (like knuckle widths) that these gloves will accommodate. And they need to supply a product like they show in their picture. I will not send these back; not worth the effort. They are still usable, better than nothing, though mostly uncomfortable. Cannot recommend...
Date published: 2016-12-22
Rated 4 out of 5 by from They're gloves I needed gloves for handling prints and these are adequate. Next time I will buy a heavier weight, because these are really thin.
Date published: 2015-03-03
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Runs small If you have big hands, it will be a bit of a squeeze.
Date published: 2017-01-23
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Way too small I ordered large because the others reviews said these are small. I was still shocked at how small they really are.
Date published: 2016-08-08
Rated 2 out of 5 by from So thin they're almost transparent These gloves may or may not prevent overt finger prints on most media, however, after wearing them and handling a couple sensitive proofs, I personally wouldn't trust them to prevent skin oil transfer on an archival print I had to deliver to a paying client. When I tried them on, they did fit comfortably, however, they are visibly and literally closer to a loose mesh than an actual barrier.
Date published: 2015-05-14
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Adequate but flimsy and undersized I use this product to handle ink jet paper and prints. They are good for signing prints without getting fingerprints on the surface around the signature. The gloves are adequate for these purposes, but they are quite flimsy and are not likely to last very long. I purchased size large and not being a presidential candidate or a large person, do not have huge hands. Nevertheless the gloves are tight and do not look like the gloves in the picture. They have no sleeve or cuff and barely cover half an inch of my wrist.
Date published: 2017-05-08
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Versatile and handy to have aroiund Though small in appearance, these gloves easily and comfortably stretched over my ex-large hands. I used these years ago for handling film, negatives, and prints, and now I find them handy for handling collection items that need to be kept in archival condition, such as stamps, knives, and coins.
Date published: 2015-01-04
  • y_2018, m_9, d_17, h_14
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_2.0.8
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_39
  • loc_en_US, sid_918841, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_bhphotovideo
Be the first to review this item
Customer Photos

Archival Methods 61-120 Q&A

Archival Methods 61-120 accessories

See any errors on this page? Let us know.