Featuring a constant bright maximum aperture and a convenient form factor, the Vario-Elmarit-SL 70-200mm f/2.8 ASPH. Lens from Leica delivers excellent performance for telephoto applications such as event, sports, portrait, and nature photography. Three aspherical elements within the lens reduce various optical aberrations and 3.5 stops of optical image stabilization allow for reliable, razor-sharp results across the entire frame.
- Full-Frame | f/2.8 to f/22
- Fast, Compact Telephoto Zoom
- Three Aspherical Elements
- 3.5-Stop Optical Image Stabilization
Business Financing Options
Leica 70-200mm f/2.8 SL Overview
Leica 70-200mm f/2.8 SL Specs
| Focal Length | |
| Aperture | |
| Lens Mount | |
| Lens Format Coverage | |
| Angle of View | |
| Minimum Focus Distance | |
| Magnification | |
| Optical Design | |
| Focus Type | |
| Image Stabilization | |
| Tripod Mounting | |
| Filter Size | |
| Dimensions | |
| Weight |
| Package Weight | |
| Box Dimensions (LxWxH) |
Leica 70-200mm f/2.8 SL Reviews
The lens I've been waiting for!
This review will appeal mostly to anyone considering this lens vs the Sigma Sport 70-200 2..8. I had the Sigma, which I was mostly happy with, but the Leica version is better. However, there is not a huge difference in optical performance. The Leica is built better, looks better, and has some subtle physical improvements over the Sigma. For one, the lens shad is MUCH better on the Leica. The shade screws in and doesn't cover any of the zoom ring like the shade does on the sigma. There are no additional knobs or settings to accidentally hit on the Leica. It is a very clean and sleek looking lens that is built like a tank! The Leica version is little heavier, but not by much. It's the same length as the Sigma, yet not as wide at the zoom ring. The tripod mount on the Leica screws off unlike the sigma, but it sits very close to the lens barrel, which can be an issue for your fingers getting jammed between the mount and the barrel if using manual focus. I found the color to be slightly more natural looking than the Sigma. Sharpness there is virtually no difference between the two as far as I can see. As far as the autofocus goes, the Leica version so far seems to be a little snappier than the Sigma, but I have not shot enough situations where I can really put that to the test so far. Overall, if you are a Leica snob like me you will like this lens better. But in all honestly, the difference is more apparent in the physical build than it is the image quality. But between the build and the slightly more natural colors, I went with the Leica.
Built Like A Tank - Shoots Sharp
There's nothing to improve other than the placement of the telephoto ring - I would have preferred it swapped with the focus ring but the fixed length makes this stand out from other 70-200 for L mounts. The images are sharp although it seems my Sony 200mm gets closer - could be the framing or SL body I'm using. It's SOLID and heavy - don't want to lug this thing around all day but the image quality outweighs the burden.
