Video / Tips and Solutions

Drones and the Law: The Sky's Not the Limit

149Share

This article should not be taken as legal advice. It merely reflects the views of its author. Please consult with an attorney to determine what, if any, legal requirements or restrictions apply to the use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in your area.

In response to booming popularity, many people have been seeking information about the legality of using unmanned remote-controlled aircraft. Drones—those carrying cameras as opposed to missile launchers—are legal. However, all but the tiniest will require registration. And commercial users, for the time being, still face some additional bureaucratic hurdles. In addition, there are a number of rules one needs to follow both to remain legally compliant and, more importantly, stay safe.

This article will focus on small unmanned aerial systems (sUAS), as they are known to the FAA. These fall within the weight range of 0.55 lb (250g) to 55 lb (25kg). Super-small RC aircraft are considered toys in the eyes of the FAA, not worthy of their attention. Before anyone gets offended, let me point out this is just a legal classification. With the miniaturization of electronics, it is quite conceivable a less than 0.55 lb drone will be a high-end piece of equipment, usable for professional video applications. If miniature drones do start getting used frequently in commercial applications, we may expect a change to the current weight-based approach to classification.

Larger-than-55 lb drones are unlikely to be used by consumers or freelance shooters. Most of these would be operated by companies. Though some hobbyist RC planes are nearly large enough to carry a human payload. But most multi-rotor drones (what the FAA really has its sights set on) weigh less than 55 lb, even with camera, batteries, and gimbal in place. 

How to register

If you have a drone on the way and just want to register, here’s what you need to know:

• You will need to be older than 13 years of age

• A citizen or legal permanent resident of the US

• Pay a nominal registration fee

For those younger than 13, you will need to have someone older than 13 register for you. For additional details and to register online, go to the FAA UAS landing page. For commercial users, see “Commercial Use,” below.

A brief history

As you are probably aware, legislation specifically targeting sUAS was only ratified in late 2015. Before that, we just had the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (sections 331-336) and a lot of confusion as to what power the FAA had over RC aircraft regulation. The FAA’s biggest sticking point was that flying UAS for commercial use was effectively prohibited with the exception of the Boeing Insitu ScanEagle and the Aerovironment Puma, and then only for deployment in the Arctic. 

By at least 2014 it was clear that laws were in dire need of updating. Why? Two factors:

• The explosion in popularly of UAS outside the previously niche RC community

• Inexpensive flight control systems that make consumer multi-rotor helicopters possible

Arguably, the two are interrelated. In the past, RC aircraft were more commonly fixed wing, meaning they required a sizable area to take off and land. And the VTOL systems (Vertical-Take-Off-and-Landing, i.e., helicopters) that did exist where very difficult to fly. Inexpensive, computerized flight controllers have made it comparatively easy to fly multi-rotor systems. Because they are VTOL-capable, and relatively compact, they can be deployed essentially anywhere, and in the hands of a skilled pilot, they can be maneuvered into all sorts of nooks and crannies.

Because today's UAS can be flown with varying degrees of autopilot assistance, from full autopilot modes based on “waypoints” (for craft with GPS) to full "agility" modes that disable virtually all safeties,  multi-rotors have attracted users with less practical flying experience. More people are using them, and more people are using them without applying common sense. Greater maneuverability means more small UAS in the air, with more being used in unexpected contexts. Because of this explosion, the government finally recognized the technology needed to be addressed formally, not to mention the growing desire on the part of businesses to put UAS to commercial use without going through a baroque-approval process.

How to fly legally

Just because drones are legal, it doesn’t mean you can use them however you please. What are the limitations?

Here are some general guidelines (source). But please remember, additional local restrictions may apply. Always consult with RC clubs or local authorities in the area you plan to fly if in any doubt.

• Keep your UAS less than 400' above ground level (AGL) and remain clear of surrounding obstacles.

• Keep your UAS within visual range. It may have a navigation system that enables it to fly on full autopilot. Nevertheless, you must be able to see your UAS at all times (an FPV video feed does not count as “visual contact”).

• Remain well clear of and do not interfere with manned aircraft operations.

• Keep out of FAA-controlled airspace. This includes a 5-mile radius around airports.

• Don't fly near people or stadiums.

• Don't be careless or reckless with your unmanned aircraft—you could be fined for endangering people or other aircraft.

What is FAA airspace?

 

For Illustration only: FAA-designated airspace classes and their respective ranges

 

If these are FAA regulations, then what constitutes FAA airspace? If you're reading this article in the United States, or in its possessions or territories, you are within the FAA's airspace, or the NAS (National Air Space of the United States). There's a widely held belief that below a certain altitude, one is outside FAA jurisdiction—some say below 400 feet, others say below 700 feet. Either way, this is a canard. FAA jurisdiction starts at the ground and extends to the edge of space. Most likely, FAA jurisdiction is being confused with FAA-"controlled" airspace.

What is FAA-controlled airspace? Essentially, it is airspace in which manned aircraft operate. The controlled airspace around airports is divided into classes by the FAA, and how these are divided will vary depending on geographical and other factors. However, a good rule of thumb is to assume that all airspace within five miles of an airport, starting at sea level, is controlled, and that operating UAS without explicit FAA approval—approval you won’t get—is prohibited.  

Newark International Airport


Commercial Use

Commercial use is now sanctioned, with new rules set to take effect in late August. They include dropping the formal requirement for an air-worthiness certificate or Section 333 exemption and a slightly eased restriction on the use of FPV equipment. The pilot can now use FPV as long as a second person maintains direct visual contract. True BVR or autonomous flying is still not allowed, but this adjustment gives the pilot the freedom to opt for FPV rather than visual line-of-sight operation if they choose.

Below are some of the highlights of the new rules. This list is by no means comprehensive. Also, there may be exceptions for some rules if suitable waivers are obtained.

The FAA oversees and regulates airspace for thousands of aircraft simultaneously.


• The pilot must have a suitable pilot certificate and be 16 years of age or older. (Currently only FAA, not foreign-issued certificates, are accepted). A non-certified pilot can also fly if supervised by a certified pilot.

• The same 55-lb weight restriction applies as to hobby UAS.

• Visual contact by either the pilot or another visual observer must be maintained.

• The aircraft must remain close enough to the actual pilot that it is within effective visual range, even if the pilot is using FPV.

• Must only be operated in daylight.

• Must operate in a way that does not interfere with other aircraft.

• Must fly at not more than 100 mph.

• Most remain at or below 400' above ground level (AGL); or remain within 400' of a structure.

Why does commercial use matter? If a DJI Phantom 4 is used by a private individual to share existing videos on YouTube, normal registration is all one needs. But if one uses the same Phantom 4 to shoot a wedding video for client, suddenly the same Phantom 4 becomes a Civil Operations aircraft. Shouldn’t regulation be based on aircraft type rather than use?

Giving the FAA the benefit of the doubt, one could argue that a commercial user is more likely to fly in contexts that expose the public or manned aircraft to risks. Cynics might rejoin that commercial registration amounts to taxation. It’s hard to defend charging a hobbyist more than a nominal registration fee; but a commercial user presumably has income related to their drone the FAA can tap into. 

Non-UAS laws that may apply

Although the FAA is the main authority when it comes to operating vehicles above ground level, the nature of the way small drones are used opens up other legal risks, including:

• Reckless endangerment (a felony)

• Invasion of privacy (can easily be upgraded to a federal complaint)

• Obstruction of police/emergency services duties (a felony)

• Noise ordinance violation

• Littering

Of those, invasion of privacy and reckless endangerment, for obvious reasons, will likely serve as the most common basis for lawsuits and prosecution against UAS operators. However, one could envision an imaginative prosecutor coming up with less obvious grounds to build a case, such as fining an operator for littering, in a case where the UAS crashed in a public area and was abandoned by the pilot. Therefore, one shouldn't assume that just because UAS represent something of a new legal frontier that one will be immune from any form of legal action.

Privacy

Because more and more UAS have cameras built in or support the attachment of cameras, privacy and UAS use is becoming a hot topic. Apart from reckless endangerment, privacy could well become a major basis for prosecution or lawsuits against UAS operators. For now, normal privacy laws would seem to apply to image and audio capture from UAS that apply in general. That is to say, for the most part, one is allowed to record or photograph in contexts where there is no "reasonable" expectation of privacy. A major caveat, however, is that UAS's typically operate well above eye level, and there are cases where this is considered to violate reasonable expectations of privacy.


In a park, or on a city street, for example, there is no "reasonable" expectation of privacy, nor is there generally a legal basis to make an invasion of privacy claim, since one is in what is understood to be a public place. The same may even apply to parts of private property "normally" visible from public space, such as a front yard visible from the street. On the other hand, recording the interior of a home or private building is illegal, even if the camera is placed outside. Additionally, exterior spaces on private property, possibly a backyard not normally visible from the street, are quite often, like the interior of a home, considered spaces where one has a reasonable expectation of privacy under the law. What this means for UVA operators is that flying over, say, someone's backyard and recording video or photos stands a good chance of qualifying as an invasion of privacy and should be avoided. This is true even where there is no direct over-flight; in other words, where there is no question of trespassing, but the camera is still able to capture images from parts of the property where reasonable expectation of privacy holds.

Will laws change in this regard? My guess is, as legislation evolves, privacy laws will become stricter as they relate to UAS than they are in general. For now, most users seem to be innocent, shooting video for the sheer enjoyment. However, it's only a matter of time before we start seeing the technology used by private investigators and others as surveillance tools. Although currently restricted, it's also likely we will see their increased use by law enforcement, as well as private security, and again it will be interesting to learn how the privacy debate pans out.

Air Rights over Private Property

The question of air rights as it relates to UAS is relatively novel since manned aircraft operate thousands of feet above populated areas, far too high to be considered trespassing. Air rights in the sense of, say, hoisting a boom over a neighbor's property are well-defined, and such an action, it's safe to assume, would indeed constitute trespassing. Some may be tempted to assume that since UAS operate in a sort of middle ground, below the elevations at which manned aircraft normally operate, yet potentially above the reach of ground-based apparatuses such as a cherry pickers, they are somehow exempt. While this may, to some extent, be arguable for larger, commercial-grade UAS that come closer to manned aircraft in capability (if they ever get legalized), it hardly seems like a good thing to risk in the case of a quadcopter or other consumer UAS. Consumer UAS don't have the range and are too unreliable—many, if they lose signal, will automatically land wherever they are, or will fly at a fixed, low elevation back to a home point. But even if consumer craft were more capable, the requirement that they have to be kept within visual range (see below) effectively limits how high they can be flown.

In other words, one would still be extremely foolish to operate over someone else's private property without permission. In a small town in Colorado, it's now legal to shoot down UAS that are flying over private property.

Beyond Visual Range (BVR)

BVR flying is currently forbidden by the FAA, and also goes against AMA (Academy of Model Aeronautics) and other guidelines. In other words, you are required to maintain visual contact with your aircraft at all times. It is now permissible for the pilot to use FPV equipment, as long as there is a secondary observer who is within line-of-sight. Since the size of the aircraft and local visibility can vary, there currently isn't a set distance as to how far away a UAS can be from the pilot/observer. However, there must also be a minimum weather visibility of 3 miles from the control station—in other words, Don’t fly in a blizzard!

Since BVR systems no longer require the Pentagon's budget to purchase, I would expect to see a lot of pressure to change this law, or otherwise nullify the FAA’s assertion. My guess is BVR will get approval for commercial applications, perhaps including Amazon's proposed drone-delivery scheme. This will be contingent on FAA certification of the aircraft model being used, as well as some sort of licensing requirement on the part of the operator. I am not as optimistic that we will see the FAA's blessing for consumer use of BVR, even though many UAS makers are already promoting BVR systems.


Who Enforces FAA Laws?

Normally, the FAA uses its own agents, and has its own enforcement mechanism. At least in theory, normal police can arrest you or otherwise enforce FAA legislation. With the widespread public use of UAS, I would expect this to change. Along with new provisions for consumer UAS will come provisions granting local law enforcement justification over non-FAA controlled airspace. Either that or we can expect to see complementary state or local laws that grant local law enforcement authority over the relevant portion of the airspace on top of any FAA legislation. For FAA-controlled airspace, I would expect things to stay more or less as they are. Unless civilian BVR flying is legalized, I would expect UAS to remain largely excluded from operating in these zones.

RC Clubs

The best piece of advice I can give for anyone who’s concerned about legalities is to consult a local RC club in your area. In the US, the best place to look is the Academy of Model Aeronautics, or AMA. Not only can they point you toward RC clubs in your area, they provide a wealth of resources for RC pilots and also offer liability insurance that will cover you for up to two million dollars in damages, provided you operate within the safety guidelines they set.

It's not just for legal issues. RC clubs provide beginners with an invaluable community of support. Members have the experience to tell you where it's safe to fly, what pitfalls you may encounter, and they can even provide training, as well as troubleshooting assistance.

Summary

What follows are some common sense guidelines to help keep you from running afoul of the law while flying safely. They should not be regarded as a summary of the law nor absolutely comprehensive, but a mixture of the law plus RC flying best practices, as applicable to the most users. As always, there are many exceptions. Contact RC clubs or other experts in your area if you are unsure or think one of these bullet points may not apply in your case.

• First and foremost, go to the FAA website and register the drone we know you’re dying to fly.

• Don’t fly above 400'.

• Don’t fly at any elevation within five miles of an airport.

• Don't fly around areas where VTOLs (helicopters) or any small commuter aircraft operate.

• Keep your aircraft within visual range and under full control.

• Don’t fly over populated areas.

• Don't record video or take photos in contexts where there is an "expectation of privacy."

• Treat the air over private property as private property.

• Follow the safely guidelines set forth by the AMA, even those that are not legally enforced.

• Commercial use has its own set of rules and requires an FAA pilot certificate.

Note: This list is not comprehensive, and in some cases the FAA may grant exceptions.

For the most part, using your drone legally means using your drone safely—which just boils down to following common sense. The laws are really there to decide what to do in cases where people willfully or negligently choose not to follow common sense. Safe flying!

To read more about the full line of drones available at B&H, click here.

Discussion 149

Add new comment

Add comment Cancel

if i bought a drone before the laws are set, do i still need to have a license to be able to fly it?

Interesting discussion but the latest ruling is this.

https://arstechnica.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/faaruling.pdf

The FAA has authority over all aircraft, which is above the United States territory at any altitude below "outter-space".  This authority is premised upon the Commerce Clause, it is not based on "property" or "airspace", but rather the flying machine which is considered 'commerce'.  Becuase non-commerce aircraft could interfere with the space occupied by commercial aircraft, the FAA has control over those flying gizmo, which even includes kites.

 However, this authority over 'aircraft' does not include "authorizing" use over property below navigable airspace.  Congress, and the US Supreme Court defines navigable airspace as being above 500ft, or above public property. The lowest possible altitude where flying does not interfere with the private property below is 365ft according to the US Supreme Court, below which an aircraft is interfereing with the landowner's domain and is therefore due compensation.  The FAA can authorize aircraft anywhere, but if they authorize use of the space above non-public property, they must pay just compensating to the property owner for taking their property.  This is called an avigational easment and is by statute paid to land owners for allowing aircraft flying over their property at below 365ft, or possibly higher if the landowner can "prove" they are a nuisance.  

Does the same rule of 5 miles from an active airport apply if the ground near the airport is lower then the airport itself? Our airport is at 3136 msl but alot of the city is around 2800 msl. So can we still fly up to the airport elevation within the 5 mile radius without contacting the tower and not be in violation of the law? We are land surveyors and most of Boise, Idaho falls within the 5 mile radius.

Regarding any local exceptions, your best bet is to consult with experienced flyiers in your area.

Cape at cape.com is setting up a beta stating: "Fly one of our Cape Drone through your computer or smartphone." Will this be legal and how would that pass through the Part 107 rules? Any thoughts from anyone?

John

A follow up on the above question about Cape, they are stating you can be at home and fly their drone by sitting at your computer and not anywhere near the drone.

Currently there is no way to operate within Part 107 parameters as you describe. The remote pilot in command must maintain a visual sightline at all times during operation. 

I'm not able to find verified information regarding flying over railroad tracks but have seen videos of drones flying over tracks. Are there any regulations or laws that prohibit this?

Hi -

There might be depending upon the height of the catenary (freely-hanging electric power cables (especially those used on electrified railways).  I would reserve this question to our friends at the FAA:

 FAA UAS landing page

I don't understand two things...

1. What does registering your drone mean?

and

2. Do you need to be licensed to fly your drone in the city/town?

Could someone help me please and thank you.

Hi Dave - 

Yes - you need to be registered.

 Go to the FAA website and register the drone:  https://www.faa.gov/uas/getting_started/

Why do I need to register my UAS?
Federal law requires that all aircraft (which includes UAS and radio/remote controlled aircraft) flown outdoors must be registered with the FAA and marked with a registration number. UAS weighing more than 0.55 pounds and less than 55 pounds may register online at https://registermyuas.faa.gov/ or by using the legacy paper based registration process. The weight limit includes everything that is on board or otherwise attached to the aircraft at the time of takeoff.

Unfortunately the author of the article perpetuated several myths about regulations on drones. There is so much wrong I won't dive in too deep but just hit the highlights. Foremost regulation regarding UAS has been around a lot longer than 2012 and no, there was no legislation ratified in late 2015 for UAS. Next, it puts forward a 400' AGL rule that does not exist. You will not find 400' anywhere in Part 101 regulations. Even the AMA safety code under 2(c) allows for flights to exceed 400' and the FAA has recognized that set of safety guidelines for better than 2 decades. Then comes the keep out of a 5-mile radius of airports. And simple fact is that there is nothing prohibiting such and in fact the FAA gives specific guidance that you can indeed fly in that space regardless of the class of airspace by notifying the airport and the air traffic control. In fact that had been a suggestion by the FAA since 1983 with advisory circular AC 91-57 that only recently was updated to require such. The new circular is AC 91-57a. Next come the near people or stadiums. The stadium portion of this comes from a specific Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) notice to airmen (NOTAM) bulletin. The TFR is ONLY in place for very specific events during narrow windows of time. Otherwise fly at will around them. And "near people" should be changed to "over people" and even then defaults to the safety guidelines of a nationwide community based organization (CBO) as required in Part 101. No where in Part 101 will you find restrictions about near people or even over people. I won't take the time to go over its assertions on airspace over private property - there is just too much wrong to correct and it isn't worth the effort.

Just to be clear, much of what I lay down is best practices based on AMA advice and other sources, not necessarily “the letter of the law”. Wording in the article will be amended to hopefully clarify this.

A drone flown over me and me dog out walking about in the woods.  It hovered over US, so I gave it my finger......how violated!!!! can't even take your dog for a walk ey???  Crazy

.....The pilot was probably looking around for nearby aircraft, looking at flight modes, checking out battery levels, consulting the flight map, grabbing a sip of water or allowing the drone to simply hover in place on GPS so that he or she could remove a jacket that had become too warm,  or any number of other boring things that may cause a hover while flying. Now if the thing had actually TRACKED you and your dog through the woods and followed you that's one thing, but too often it seems when people see a drone in the air they automatically assume (on sight) that they are somehow personally its target and Offended by its presence.

I totally understand where your coming from here, but it's possible that the pilot wasn't doing anything malicious or even aware that you were trying to "communicate" with them at all depending on the altitude of the drone and visibility through the trees.

I have some news about all the FAA regulations concerning drones.

If your drone is tethered they have no rules to prevent you from flying and or doing whatever for it is considered a KITE. Attached to the operator. FAA does not regulate KITES.  SO, if you fly a drone you can litterally hook a fishing line to it and fly. I use a small fishing lead wieght positioned and attached in a V formation under attached to body. 

I have had a ranger come to me and saw my tether and walked away. My insurance company uses me for damage claims and so does Real Estate firms rent the Fotokite from me cause an idiot can fly these. Since it is tethered there is no proabition from use of your video or photography. Leash comes in 2 sizes. One 27 ft the other 100ft. Smart leash is way to go though. 

Fly reasponsibly all.

I’m pretty pleased to find this site. I really appreciate your efforts and I am waiting for your further posts. Thanks!

Quite a creative story - what you missed, though, is that fishing line attached to a drone would get caught up in the props on the first flight.

This does not sound right, or safe at all. These aircraft are not meant to be tethered. So many scenarios where that line could get caught and twisted up, potentially damaging nearby property or poeple if the proper precautions aren't taken.

If you are really going through that much trouble to try and outsmart the FAA and find loopholes around safety egulations, then you have no business flying these aircraft. I hope you reconsider. It's decisions like these that give the rest of us responsible fliers a bad name. Quite ironic that you mention to "fly responsibly" in your post. 

My kids want to fly some under 0.55lb helicopters in our yard.  Does this require us calling the 5 heliports within 5 miles of our back yard before they fly the models around the yard?

Hi jimmy,

This article is meant to provide general tips and best practices. Of course there are always exceptions. For this reason, I would not be able to speak to any local restrictions/exemptions that might apply in a particular area.

The website looks fantastic !! Great job

Anything under .55 lbs is not considered a licensable unit. Their affectioanely called toys. The do not fall under FAA regs.

VTOL's are used for emergency transportation from accident scenario or natural disaster to hospitals. How air restrictions can be handled when drones for commercial use (media news, or rescue matters by a private security company)? Including the use of drones for situational assessment after a natural (or hand made) disaster....

So how about the airspace INSIDE of a building? Does the FAA have jurisdiction over that airspace? Even for commercial applications? 

Nope, the FAA does not have jurisdiction inside a structure. Fly your drone (and paper airplanes) as much as you want, inside...as long as the owner of the space permits it.

I just bought my first drone and was wondering about the new law for having a pilots license. I just plan to use it for my private use. I know I have to register it but doI also have to get a license to fly it? 

The drone definitely needs to be registered.  To the best of my knowledge on current regulations, at this time you simply need a license if you will be using the drone for professional applications.  Enthusiasts would only need to have the drone registered: they would not need a pilot license to operate their drone.  Keep in mind that these regulations can change.

The 400 feet continues to be vague .  It should be 400 feet above "ground," not from the starting point.  If you are flying up a hill or mountain the altitude will change.   And the FAA is not clear about altitude restrictions near airport or not near airports.

Hi Phil,

As a former Naval Aviator and commercial licensed pilot, I can assure you that the FAA is very very clear about altitude restrictions in the airspace system. Attitudes are either listed as MSL or AGL. MSL is Mean Sea Level—altitude above sea level. AGL is Above Ground Level—self explanatory.

If you are operating a UAV in the airspace system, definitely refer to aeronautical charts to be certain you are staying out of controlled airspace.

Thanks for reading!

The FAA is clear about use near airports.  You aren't allowed to fly them AT ALL near an airport without authorization, typically a flight plan submission, and airport communication during flight, then you still have the same 400' limit.

However the 400' was never vague.  Nobody ever stated it was above starting point so you are alone in your confusion, perhaps also making excuses to break the law?  Obviously the 400' is to prevent other aircraft from having potential collsion so it would always be 400' above the hill or mountain where one exists, not that you would have to crash into the side ofa mountain if it's over 400' high, which would be utterly ridiculous.

davey, very nicely explained.  

Regulations clearly state 400' AGL. Or, if you are inspecting a structure that is 500' tall, you are permitted to fly up to 900' within a 100' radius around the structure. 

As far as airports, consult the B4U fly app and contact ATC if you are within bounds and unsure. 

Am I the first phantom 3 stocking victim?

That depends. Did the Phantom 3 put you back on the shelf?

It is indeed legal to fly within 5 miles of an airport. You must notify the operator and tower before doing so.

Hello, 

Thank you for the insights and article ! Very informative !

Would you know if registration is required when renting a drone ? ( I've seen several websites offering a daily/weekly drone rent)

Thanks. 

I just purchased a phantom 4 and am eager to fly it over inland waterways in NYC like the Gowanus Canal and Newtown Creek. would I be breaking any laws by doing this if they are outside no-fly zones? 

Hey Christopher,

Definitely do your research before flying in those areas. Airspace restrictions change often and we cannot give you a definitive answer based on current regulations.

Thanks, good luck, and fly safe!

I took this pic at 1032 ft I didn't have no clues until some one in Central Park asked me if it legal to fly that high since he has a parrot bebop which lead me to this web site

Use your best judgement and you really should get an aviation sectional chart of the region you intend to fly your drone in. They are available on line. . When in doubt contact your local FAA Flight standards district office and ask. Actually this is whom your questions should be directed towards. Never rely on the Arm chair experts on forums like this. CYA.

I've been flying RC helocopters for over 20 years and have recently entered the quadcopter (drone) side of the hobby. Just wanted to say thanks for the great article and overall, people really need to lighten up when it comes to these 'evil' drones we fly. If the only difference between a 'drone' and an RC airplane is if it has a camera on it or not, people need to remember that we are allowed to photograph whatever we want as long as we aren't filming you peeing at 2am. And who would want to see that anyway.

A person was operating a drone to take a video during a recent fireworks display at a municipal park.  The drone obstructed the view of the fireworks and at times flew over spectators.  It was both annoying and potentially dangerous.  It seems there should be restrictions put in place to prohibit the encroachment on others' enjoyment!

There are already restrictions about flying near people.  Jam the signal and follow it back to the owner.

Does "Jamming" the signal mean interfering with the control of the UAS?  

If so, then I could not agree with you whatsoever!  That is nearly as reckless, and even more stupid than flying over people in the first place.  What happens if the "jamming" leads to a crash among the people?

Following it back to the owner/operator, but interfering with the operation sounds just as risky.

Hoppy

Please tell me how to jam the signal

Thanks

Jamming any RF (Radio Frequency) signal is the US is illegal. 

Is their anything i can do legally to someone for downing my drone while flying it back to my boat on a public lake?

This would be considered destruction of property.  You could file a claim with the local police, though you will likely need to have the name of the person that damaged your equipment.

Show older comments

Close

Close

Close